美国SARS-CoV-2检测规模的扩大:对一段时间内生产和使用的检测数量及其对COVID-19大流行的模拟影响的分析

IF 25.4 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Steven Santos, Matthew Humbard, Anastasia S Lambrou, Gary Lin, Yamil Padilla, Jasmine Chaitram, Muktha S Natrajan, Hannah L Kirking, Sean Courtney, Kim Del Guercio, Seth Roberts, Fraser Gaspar, Michael F Iademarco, Joseph Hamel, Reynolds M Salerno
{"title":"美国SARS-CoV-2检测规模的扩大:对一段时间内生产和使用的检测数量及其对COVID-19大流行的模拟影响的分析","authors":"Steven Santos, Matthew Humbard, Anastasia S Lambrou, Gary Lin, Yamil Padilla, Jasmine Chaitram, Muktha S Natrajan, Hannah L Kirking, Sean Courtney, Kim Del Guercio, Seth Roberts, Fraser Gaspar, Michael F Iademarco, Joseph Hamel, Reynolds M Salerno","doi":"10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00279-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Rapid, accessible, and accurate testing was paramount to an effective US COVID-19 response. Federal partners supported SARS-CoV-2 testing scale-up through an interagency-coordinated approach that focused on expanding supply chains, research and development, validation, and improving patient access. We aimed to provide an overview of the federal efforts to scale up the testing response and study the impact of scale-up.<h3>Methods</h3>In this descriptive analysis, we mapped federal partner activities and milestones using the US Government Testing and Diagnostics Working Group (TDWG) and participating agency and department data from Jan 1, 2020, to Dec 31, 2022. Tests produced (TDWG), reported test positivity (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]'s COVID-19 Electronic Laboratory Reporting system and the Federal Direct Report testing data), reported COVID-19 case counts (CDC), hospitalisations (Department of Health and Human Services Unified Hospital Data Surveillance System and the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network), and deaths (CDC) were analysed over time. We then developed an agent-based model to evaluate the impact testing had on COVID-19 outcomes using different scenarios. The scenarios were (1) if efforts led to substantially fewer tests produced, (2) if scale-up was delayed, affecting test access, and (3) if efforts led to substantially more tests produced.<h3>Findings</h3>Approximately 6·7 billion SARS-CoV-2 tests, including over 1·5 billion laboratory-based, 1·9 billion point-of-care (POC), and 3·2 billion over-the-counter (OTC) tests, were produced, and approximately 2·7 billion tests were performed between Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2022. Testing capacity exhibited various expansion phases, with laboratory-based capacity growing from approximately 6 million tests per month in March, 2020 to approximately 34 million tests per month in July, 2020; POC increased to approximately 126 million tests per month by December, 2020, and OTC increased to approximately 986 million tests per month by February, 2022. Comparison between the baseline (actual) and delay-in-testing scenario suggests the increased testing capacity potentially saved upwards of 1·4 million lives and averted 7 million hospitalisations.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Our study suggests that early development, manufacturing, and distribution of tests had a great impact on reducing severe COVID-19 outcomes. These results highlight the importance of robust and rapid test development, production, and distribution when addressing future public health threats.<h3>Funding</h3>US Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.","PeriodicalId":56027,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Public Health","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The SARS-CoV-2 test scale-up in the USA: an analysis of the number of tests produced and used over time and their modelled impact on the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Steven Santos, Matthew Humbard, Anastasia S Lambrou, Gary Lin, Yamil Padilla, Jasmine Chaitram, Muktha S Natrajan, Hannah L Kirking, Sean Courtney, Kim Del Guercio, Seth Roberts, Fraser Gaspar, Michael F Iademarco, Joseph Hamel, Reynolds M Salerno\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00279-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>Rapid, accessible, and accurate testing was paramount to an effective US COVID-19 response. Federal partners supported SARS-CoV-2 testing scale-up through an interagency-coordinated approach that focused on expanding supply chains, research and development, validation, and improving patient access. We aimed to provide an overview of the federal efforts to scale up the testing response and study the impact of scale-up.<h3>Methods</h3>In this descriptive analysis, we mapped federal partner activities and milestones using the US Government Testing and Diagnostics Working Group (TDWG) and participating agency and department data from Jan 1, 2020, to Dec 31, 2022. Tests produced (TDWG), reported test positivity (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]'s COVID-19 Electronic Laboratory Reporting system and the Federal Direct Report testing data), reported COVID-19 case counts (CDC), hospitalisations (Department of Health and Human Services Unified Hospital Data Surveillance System and the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network), and deaths (CDC) were analysed over time. We then developed an agent-based model to evaluate the impact testing had on COVID-19 outcomes using different scenarios. The scenarios were (1) if efforts led to substantially fewer tests produced, (2) if scale-up was delayed, affecting test access, and (3) if efforts led to substantially more tests produced.<h3>Findings</h3>Approximately 6·7 billion SARS-CoV-2 tests, including over 1·5 billion laboratory-based, 1·9 billion point-of-care (POC), and 3·2 billion over-the-counter (OTC) tests, were produced, and approximately 2·7 billion tests were performed between Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2022. Testing capacity exhibited various expansion phases, with laboratory-based capacity growing from approximately 6 million tests per month in March, 2020 to approximately 34 million tests per month in July, 2020; POC increased to approximately 126 million tests per month by December, 2020, and OTC increased to approximately 986 million tests per month by February, 2022. Comparison between the baseline (actual) and delay-in-testing scenario suggests the increased testing capacity potentially saved upwards of 1·4 million lives and averted 7 million hospitalisations.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Our study suggests that early development, manufacturing, and distribution of tests had a great impact on reducing severe COVID-19 outcomes. These results highlight the importance of robust and rapid test development, production, and distribution when addressing future public health threats.<h3>Funding</h3>US Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Public Health\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":25.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00279-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00279-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速、方便和准确的检测对于美国有效应对COVID-19至关重要。联邦合作伙伴支持通过机构间协调的方法扩大SARS-CoV-2检测,重点是扩大供应链、研发、验证和改善患者可及性。我们的目的是概述联邦政府为扩大检测响应规模所做的努力,并研究扩大规模的影响。在这一描述性分析中,我们使用美国政府检测和诊断工作组(TDWG)和参与机构和部门的数据,绘制了2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日的联邦合作伙伴活动和里程碑。随着时间的推移,分析了产生的测试(TDWG)、报告的测试阳性(美国疾病控制和预防中心[CDC]的COVID-19电子实验室报告系统和联邦直接报告测试数据)、报告的COVID-19病例数(CDC)、住院(卫生和人类服务部统一医院数据监测系统和CDC的国家医疗保健安全网络)和死亡(CDC)。然后,我们开发了一个基于代理的模型,以评估不同场景下测试对COVID-19结果的影响。这些场景是(1)如果努力导致生成的测试数量大幅减少,(2)如果扩展被延迟,影响测试访问,以及(3)如果努力导致生成的测试数量大幅增加。研究结果:在2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间,生产了大约67亿次SARS-CoV-2检测,包括超过15亿次实验室检测、19亿次护理点(POC)检测和32亿次非处方(OTC)检测,并进行了大约27亿次检测。测试能力经历了不同的扩展阶段,实验室能力从2020年3月的每月约600万次测试增加到2020年7月的每月约3400万次测试;到2020年12月,POC增加到每月约1.26亿次测试,到2022年2月,OTC增加到每月约9.86亿次测试。基线(实际)和延迟检测情景之间的比较表明,检测能力的提高可能挽救140多万人的生命,避免700万人住院。我们的研究表明,早期开发、制造和分发测试对减少COVID-19严重后果有很大影响。这些结果突出了在应对未来公共卫生威胁时,强有力和快速的测试开发、生产和分发的重要性。资助美国战略准备和反应管理局以及美国疾病控制和预防中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The SARS-CoV-2 test scale-up in the USA: an analysis of the number of tests produced and used over time and their modelled impact on the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Rapid, accessible, and accurate testing was paramount to an effective US COVID-19 response. Federal partners supported SARS-CoV-2 testing scale-up through an interagency-coordinated approach that focused on expanding supply chains, research and development, validation, and improving patient access. We aimed to provide an overview of the federal efforts to scale up the testing response and study the impact of scale-up.

Methods

In this descriptive analysis, we mapped federal partner activities and milestones using the US Government Testing and Diagnostics Working Group (TDWG) and participating agency and department data from Jan 1, 2020, to Dec 31, 2022. Tests produced (TDWG), reported test positivity (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]'s COVID-19 Electronic Laboratory Reporting system and the Federal Direct Report testing data), reported COVID-19 case counts (CDC), hospitalisations (Department of Health and Human Services Unified Hospital Data Surveillance System and the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network), and deaths (CDC) were analysed over time. We then developed an agent-based model to evaluate the impact testing had on COVID-19 outcomes using different scenarios. The scenarios were (1) if efforts led to substantially fewer tests produced, (2) if scale-up was delayed, affecting test access, and (3) if efforts led to substantially more tests produced.

Findings

Approximately 6·7 billion SARS-CoV-2 tests, including over 1·5 billion laboratory-based, 1·9 billion point-of-care (POC), and 3·2 billion over-the-counter (OTC) tests, were produced, and approximately 2·7 billion tests were performed between Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2022. Testing capacity exhibited various expansion phases, with laboratory-based capacity growing from approximately 6 million tests per month in March, 2020 to approximately 34 million tests per month in July, 2020; POC increased to approximately 126 million tests per month by December, 2020, and OTC increased to approximately 986 million tests per month by February, 2022. Comparison between the baseline (actual) and delay-in-testing scenario suggests the increased testing capacity potentially saved upwards of 1·4 million lives and averted 7 million hospitalisations.

Interpretation

Our study suggests that early development, manufacturing, and distribution of tests had a great impact on reducing severe COVID-19 outcomes. These results highlight the importance of robust and rapid test development, production, and distribution when addressing future public health threats.

Funding

US Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Public Health
Lancet Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
55.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Public Health is committed to tackling the most pressing issues across all aspects of public health. We have a strong commitment to using science to improve health equity and social justice. In line with the values and vision of The Lancet, we take a broad and inclusive approach to public health and are interested in interdisciplinary research. We publish a range of content types that can advance public health policies and outcomes. These include Articles, Review, Comment, and Correspondence. Learn more about the types of papers we publish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信