英国现有建筑中木材元素的回收和再利用策略

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Martha Godina , Penny Gowler , Colin M. Rose , Eduardo Wiegand , Harry F. Mills , Antiopi Koronaki , Michael H. Ramage , Darshil U. Shah
{"title":"英国现有建筑中木材元素的回收和再利用策略","authors":"Martha Godina ,&nbsp;Penny Gowler ,&nbsp;Colin M. Rose ,&nbsp;Eduardo Wiegand ,&nbsp;Harry F. Mills ,&nbsp;Antiopi Koronaki ,&nbsp;Michael H. Ramage ,&nbsp;Darshil U. Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The reuse of construction materials and the elimination of construction and demolition waste is at the core of the circular economy in the construction sector. Timber is one of the most promising sustainable construction materials; however, there is no regulation, guidance or route within current business models to promote its circularity or certify that the recovered wood material is fit for a new life. This research investigates strategies for salvaging and repurposing timber elements from existing buildings, by reusing or upcycling timber into engineered wood products — referred to as mass secondary timber (MST). Through systematic interviews of key stakeholders of the timber construction supply chain in the UK, including contractors for construction and demolition, this research identifies barriers and opportunities for salvaging structural timber and for repurposing reclaimed timber. The findings show that whilst deconstruction requires a different skillset from that of demolition, there are virtually no technical barriers for salvaging wood. The challenges are related to the time and logistics needed for careful deconstruction, the reconditioning of the reclaimed wood and the lack of an established supply chain that enables its reuse. Strategies for reclamation and repurposing are proposed in view of the processes that could be implemented now to pave the way for the development of a circular value chain for timber construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"489 ","pages":"Article 144629"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for salvaging and repurposing timber elements from existing buildings in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Martha Godina ,&nbsp;Penny Gowler ,&nbsp;Colin M. Rose ,&nbsp;Eduardo Wiegand ,&nbsp;Harry F. Mills ,&nbsp;Antiopi Koronaki ,&nbsp;Michael H. Ramage ,&nbsp;Darshil U. Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The reuse of construction materials and the elimination of construction and demolition waste is at the core of the circular economy in the construction sector. Timber is one of the most promising sustainable construction materials; however, there is no regulation, guidance or route within current business models to promote its circularity or certify that the recovered wood material is fit for a new life. This research investigates strategies for salvaging and repurposing timber elements from existing buildings, by reusing or upcycling timber into engineered wood products — referred to as mass secondary timber (MST). Through systematic interviews of key stakeholders of the timber construction supply chain in the UK, including contractors for construction and demolition, this research identifies barriers and opportunities for salvaging structural timber and for repurposing reclaimed timber. The findings show that whilst deconstruction requires a different skillset from that of demolition, there are virtually no technical barriers for salvaging wood. The challenges are related to the time and logistics needed for careful deconstruction, the reconditioning of the reclaimed wood and the lack of an established supply chain that enables its reuse. Strategies for reclamation and repurposing are proposed in view of the processes that could be implemented now to pave the way for the development of a circular value chain for timber construction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"489 \",\"pages\":\"Article 144629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624040782\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624040782","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑材料的再利用和建筑拆除垃圾的消除是建筑行业循环经济的核心。木材是最有前途的可持续建筑材料之一;然而,在目前的商业模式中,没有任何法规、指导或路线来促进其循环性或证明回收的木材材料适合新生活。本研究调查了从现有建筑中回收和再利用木材元素的策略,通过再利用或升级木材制成工程木制品-被称为大规模二次木材(MST)。通过对英国木结构供应链的主要利益相关者(包括建筑和拆除承包商)的系统访谈,本研究确定了回收结构木材和再利用再生木材的障碍和机会。调查结果表明,虽然解构需要的技能与拆除不同,但打捞木材实际上没有技术障碍。这些挑战涉及到仔细解构所需的时间和物流,回收木材的修复以及缺乏成熟的供应链,使其能够重复使用。鉴于现在可以实施的过程,提出了回收和重新利用的战略,为木结构循环价值链的发展铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for salvaging and repurposing timber elements from existing buildings in the UK
The reuse of construction materials and the elimination of construction and demolition waste is at the core of the circular economy in the construction sector. Timber is one of the most promising sustainable construction materials; however, there is no regulation, guidance or route within current business models to promote its circularity or certify that the recovered wood material is fit for a new life. This research investigates strategies for salvaging and repurposing timber elements from existing buildings, by reusing or upcycling timber into engineered wood products — referred to as mass secondary timber (MST). Through systematic interviews of key stakeholders of the timber construction supply chain in the UK, including contractors for construction and demolition, this research identifies barriers and opportunities for salvaging structural timber and for repurposing reclaimed timber. The findings show that whilst deconstruction requires a different skillset from that of demolition, there are virtually no technical barriers for salvaging wood. The challenges are related to the time and logistics needed for careful deconstruction, the reconditioning of the reclaimed wood and the lack of an established supply chain that enables its reuse. Strategies for reclamation and repurposing are proposed in view of the processes that could be implemented now to pave the way for the development of a circular value chain for timber construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信