关于这一非凡分支的假纲成员,没有任何“伪”的东西再次出现在《解剖学记录》的页面上。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Jeffrey T. Laitman, Heather F. Smith
{"title":"关于这一非凡分支的假纲成员,没有任何“伪”的东西再次出现在《解剖学记录》的页面上。","authors":"Jeffrey T. Laitman,&nbsp;Heather F. Smith","doi":"10.1002/ar.25615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some animal groups have the right to ask the press for a do-over: “killer” whales, while clearly not vegans, are family-oriented giants who show caring and compassion; guinea “pigs,” while a bit pudgy in appearance, are rodents and in no evolutionary way cousins of pigs; likewise, prairie “dogs” are not related to a human's best friend and are rather cousins of New York City's formidable sewer rats; and the only flying “foxes” are probably the poor critters that were scared to death being hunted by hordes of English nobles, with such animals actually being fruit bats of the order Chiroptera. And, Pseudosuchia is also disrespectfully named, damning a host of varied reptiles to be labeled as some sort of “less than” or “false” relatives of crocodiles when they are not.</p><p>First off, a disclaimer: the authors of this editorial were weaned in the study of primates, that is, humans and our kin, monkeys, apes, and all historical relatives. Studying their history is, truthfully, not that difficult. Basically, everything revolves around us and who is most like us. Direct human-like relatives started to come about likely during the Miocene epoch, some 8–10 mya, and all of our primate-like relatives came creeping out from under tree stumps when the non-avian dinosaurs died out and mammals took over around 65 mya in the late Cretaceous. Easy stuff, really.</p><p>Now, when it gets to who's who in the world of reptiles and their relatives—that is another story, and one you really have to be “in-the-know” to really know. Reptiles and the varied cousins began their path sometime in the remarkable Triassic period of the Mesozoic era that started some 251 million years ago (mya) at the end of the Permian Period of the Paleozoic Era (for a glimpse into the extraordinary diversity of life forms in the Triassic see the recent <i>Anatomical Record</i> Special Issue, “The Dawn of an Era: New Contributions on Comparative and Functional Anatomy of Triassic Tetrapods,” Pinheiro, Pretto, Kerber, <span>2024</span>; Laitman &amp; Smith, <span>2024</span>). The term “Pseudosuchia” was created by German paleontologist Karl Alfred von Zittel in 1887–1890 (see Von Zittel, <span>1901</span>) and used to identify a grouping of somewhat, or superficially, “crocodile-like” (<i>pseudos</i> meaning false, <i>souchos</i> meaning crocodile in ancient Greek) prehistoric Triassic reptiles of the clade Archosauria. The term Pseudosuchia was used to differentiate these superficially “crocodile-like” archosaurs from the more “bird-like” archosaurs often referred to as Avemetatarsalia. Over the years since the clade was anointed, numerous changes have occurred in fossil reptilian taxonomy and phylogeny. Groups have crept in and swam out; indeed, today, true crocodilians are frequently defined as a subset of Pseudosuchia (for a detailed dining experience on all things crocodilian, see the recent <i>Anatomical Record</i> Special Issue, The Age of Crocodilians and their kin: Their Anatomy, Physiology and Evolution, Holliday &amp; Schachner, <span>2022</span>; Laitman &amp; Smith, <span>2022</span>). So, there you have it: groups that were originally thought to be “false” crocodiles were originally the reason for creating the Pseudosuchia, but now true crocodiles are put <i>within</i> Pseudosuchia. Got it; never-mind. Those who know can argue about it at their toothy, reptile meetings, yet seem to agree (more or less) on which fossil bones go into which museum drawers.</p><p>Misnomers to the side, pseudosuchians—whomever gets placed in them—have been around a long, long while and contain an extraordinary diversity of taxa past and present. This cornucopia of all things pseudosuchian is beautifully on display in this month's special issue of <i>The Anatomical Record</i>, “Recent Advances in Pseudosuchia Paleobiology and Systematics.” The issue has been Guest edited by a trio of pseudosuchia-philes who have long had a love for piecing together the past of these extraordinary animals: Mariana Valéria de Araújo Sena and Jorge Cubo, both from the Centre de recherche en paléontologie, Sorbonne Université, in the incomparable city of Paris; and Holly Noelle Woodward from the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences at the also fascinating all-American city of Tulsa, Oklahoma (Sena et al., <span>2025</span>) (Figure 1). These investigators represent the modern multifaceted species of scientists who blend their research on comparative biology, bone histology, and physiology (often published in our journal; see, e.g., de Margerie et al., <span>2004</span>; Rainwater et al., <span>2022</span>; Cubo et al., <span>2025</span>; Heck &amp; Woodward, <span>2025</span>; Woodward, Aubier, de Sena, &amp; Cubo, <span>2025</span>) with their intense examination of fossil remains to reconstruct species and their pathways. The papers in this issue came from a core of presentations at a July 2023 symposium organized by the trio entitled “Paleohistological Inferences of Paleobiological Traits in Pseudosuchia” held at the International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology in Cairns, Australia. Co-author of this editorial, Heather Smith, pulled herself away from shrimps on the barbie, enthralled by the pseudosuchia tales, and opened the door to directing their science towards our journal. Co-author, Jeff Laitman, sealed the deal with Professors Cubo and Sena at their Paris dwellings at the legendary Sorbonne, using his ancestral Gallic charm to convince them that their beloved pseudosuchians would be most at home within the fossil friendly pages of <i>The Anatomical Record</i>.</p><p>From who they were, to how they moved, to how their bodies morphed and changed during ontogeny and throughout their evolutionary history, to their thermo-physiology, to, of course, their phylogenetic relationships, this novel Special Issue drills down into the world of the pseudosuchians. So, even if you are not up on all the intricacies of reptilian and archosaurian classification, paleobiology, and systematics you will enjoy and learn from this novel special issue. And, you will emerge wanting to rename the “pseudo-suchians” the “axio-suchians,” that is, the “worthy” suchians. All of the “killer” whales, “flying” foxes, guinea “pigs,” and other disrespected vertebrates are already cheering!</p><p><b>Jeffrey T. Laitman:</b> Writing – original draft; conceptualization; investigation; project administration. <b>Heather F. Smith:</b> Writing – review and editing; conceptualization; project administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50965,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","volume":"308 2","pages":"235-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.25615","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nothing “pseudo” about the Pseudosuchia—members of this extraordinary clade thunder again into the pages of The Anatomical Record\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey T. Laitman,&nbsp;Heather F. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ar.25615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Some animal groups have the right to ask the press for a do-over: “killer” whales, while clearly not vegans, are family-oriented giants who show caring and compassion; guinea “pigs,” while a bit pudgy in appearance, are rodents and in no evolutionary way cousins of pigs; likewise, prairie “dogs” are not related to a human's best friend and are rather cousins of New York City's formidable sewer rats; and the only flying “foxes” are probably the poor critters that were scared to death being hunted by hordes of English nobles, with such animals actually being fruit bats of the order Chiroptera. And, Pseudosuchia is also disrespectfully named, damning a host of varied reptiles to be labeled as some sort of “less than” or “false” relatives of crocodiles when they are not.</p><p>First off, a disclaimer: the authors of this editorial were weaned in the study of primates, that is, humans and our kin, monkeys, apes, and all historical relatives. Studying their history is, truthfully, not that difficult. Basically, everything revolves around us and who is most like us. Direct human-like relatives started to come about likely during the Miocene epoch, some 8–10 mya, and all of our primate-like relatives came creeping out from under tree stumps when the non-avian dinosaurs died out and mammals took over around 65 mya in the late Cretaceous. Easy stuff, really.</p><p>Now, when it gets to who's who in the world of reptiles and their relatives—that is another story, and one you really have to be “in-the-know” to really know. Reptiles and the varied cousins began their path sometime in the remarkable Triassic period of the Mesozoic era that started some 251 million years ago (mya) at the end of the Permian Period of the Paleozoic Era (for a glimpse into the extraordinary diversity of life forms in the Triassic see the recent <i>Anatomical Record</i> Special Issue, “The Dawn of an Era: New Contributions on Comparative and Functional Anatomy of Triassic Tetrapods,” Pinheiro, Pretto, Kerber, <span>2024</span>; Laitman &amp; Smith, <span>2024</span>). The term “Pseudosuchia” was created by German paleontologist Karl Alfred von Zittel in 1887–1890 (see Von Zittel, <span>1901</span>) and used to identify a grouping of somewhat, or superficially, “crocodile-like” (<i>pseudos</i> meaning false, <i>souchos</i> meaning crocodile in ancient Greek) prehistoric Triassic reptiles of the clade Archosauria. The term Pseudosuchia was used to differentiate these superficially “crocodile-like” archosaurs from the more “bird-like” archosaurs often referred to as Avemetatarsalia. Over the years since the clade was anointed, numerous changes have occurred in fossil reptilian taxonomy and phylogeny. Groups have crept in and swam out; indeed, today, true crocodilians are frequently defined as a subset of Pseudosuchia (for a detailed dining experience on all things crocodilian, see the recent <i>Anatomical Record</i> Special Issue, The Age of Crocodilians and their kin: Their Anatomy, Physiology and Evolution, Holliday &amp; Schachner, <span>2022</span>; Laitman &amp; Smith, <span>2022</span>). So, there you have it: groups that were originally thought to be “false” crocodiles were originally the reason for creating the Pseudosuchia, but now true crocodiles are put <i>within</i> Pseudosuchia. Got it; never-mind. Those who know can argue about it at their toothy, reptile meetings, yet seem to agree (more or less) on which fossil bones go into which museum drawers.</p><p>Misnomers to the side, pseudosuchians—whomever gets placed in them—have been around a long, long while and contain an extraordinary diversity of taxa past and present. This cornucopia of all things pseudosuchian is beautifully on display in this month's special issue of <i>The Anatomical Record</i>, “Recent Advances in Pseudosuchia Paleobiology and Systematics.” The issue has been Guest edited by a trio of pseudosuchia-philes who have long had a love for piecing together the past of these extraordinary animals: Mariana Valéria de Araújo Sena and Jorge Cubo, both from the Centre de recherche en paléontologie, Sorbonne Université, in the incomparable city of Paris; and Holly Noelle Woodward from the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences at the also fascinating all-American city of Tulsa, Oklahoma (Sena et al., <span>2025</span>) (Figure 1). These investigators represent the modern multifaceted species of scientists who blend their research on comparative biology, bone histology, and physiology (often published in our journal; see, e.g., de Margerie et al., <span>2004</span>; Rainwater et al., <span>2022</span>; Cubo et al., <span>2025</span>; Heck &amp; Woodward, <span>2025</span>; Woodward, Aubier, de Sena, &amp; Cubo, <span>2025</span>) with their intense examination of fossil remains to reconstruct species and their pathways. The papers in this issue came from a core of presentations at a July 2023 symposium organized by the trio entitled “Paleohistological Inferences of Paleobiological Traits in Pseudosuchia” held at the International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology in Cairns, Australia. Co-author of this editorial, Heather Smith, pulled herself away from shrimps on the barbie, enthralled by the pseudosuchia tales, and opened the door to directing their science towards our journal. Co-author, Jeff Laitman, sealed the deal with Professors Cubo and Sena at their Paris dwellings at the legendary Sorbonne, using his ancestral Gallic charm to convince them that their beloved pseudosuchians would be most at home within the fossil friendly pages of <i>The Anatomical Record</i>.</p><p>From who they were, to how they moved, to how their bodies morphed and changed during ontogeny and throughout their evolutionary history, to their thermo-physiology, to, of course, their phylogenetic relationships, this novel Special Issue drills down into the world of the pseudosuchians. So, even if you are not up on all the intricacies of reptilian and archosaurian classification, paleobiology, and systematics you will enjoy and learn from this novel special issue. And, you will emerge wanting to rename the “pseudo-suchians” the “axio-suchians,” that is, the “worthy” suchians. All of the “killer” whales, “flying” foxes, guinea “pigs,” and other disrespected vertebrates are already cheering!</p><p><b>Jeffrey T. Laitman:</b> Writing – original draft; conceptualization; investigation; project administration. <b>Heather F. Smith:</b> Writing – review and editing; conceptualization; project administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology\",\"volume\":\"308 2\",\"pages\":\"235-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ar.25615\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ar.25615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些动物保护组织有权要求媒体重来一遍:“虎鲸”虽然显然不是素食主义者,但它们是顾家的巨人,表现出关心和同情;豚鼠虽然看起来有点胖,但它们是啮齿类动物,在进化上与猪没有亲缘关系;同样,草原“狗”与人类最好的朋友没有关系,而是纽约可怕的下水道老鼠的表亲;唯一会飞的“狐狸”可能是那些被成群的英国贵族追捕吓死的可怜的小动物,这些动物实际上是翼目的果蝠。而且,Pseudosuchia也有一个不尊重的名字,谴责许多不同的爬行动物被贴上某种“不如”或“假”鳄鱼的亲戚的标签,但它们不是。首先,免责声明:这篇社论的作者是在灵长类动物的研究中断奶的,也就是说,人类和我们的近亲,猴子,猿,以及所有的历史亲戚。事实上,研究他们的历史并不难。基本上,一切都围绕着我们和谁最像我们。类似人类的直系近亲很可能在中新世开始出现,大约在8-10万年左右,当非鸟类恐龙灭绝,哺乳动物在白垩纪晚期接管了大约65万年时,我们所有类似灵长类动物的近亲都从树桩下爬了出来。很简单,真的。现在,当谈到爬行动物及其亲戚的世界中谁是谁时,这是另一个故事,你真的必须“内行”才能真正了解。爬行动物及其不同的近亲在大约2.51亿年前(mya)古生代二叠纪末期开始的中生代三叠纪时期的某个时候开始了它们的道路(要了解三叠纪生命形式的非凡多样性,请参阅最近的解剖记录特刊,“一个时代的黎明:三叠纪四足动物比较和功能解剖学的新贡献”,Pinheiro, Pretto, Kerber, 2024;Laitman,史密斯,2024)。“Pseudosuchia”一词是由德国古生物学家Karl Alfred von Zittel于1887-1890年创造的(参见von Zittel, 1901),用于识别一组有点或表面上“像鳄鱼”的史前三叠纪始祖门爬行动物(pseudos意思是假的,souchos意思是古希腊语中的鳄鱼)。伪龙这个词被用来区分这些表面上“像鳄鱼”的祖龙和更“像鸟”的祖龙,这些祖龙通常被称为Avemetatarsalia。自从这一分支被确定以来,爬行动物化石的分类和系统发育发生了许多变化。一群群人潜入又游出;事实上,今天,真正的鳄鱼经常被定义为假鳄目动物的一个子集(有关鳄鱼类动物的详细用餐体验,请参阅最近的解剖记录特刊,鳄鱼及其亲属的时代:它们的解剖,生理和进化,Holliday &amp;Schachner, 2022;Laitman,史密斯,2022)。所以,你知道了:最初被认为是“假”鳄鱼的群体最初是创造假鳄目的原因,但现在真鳄被放在假鳄目中。明白了;没关系。那些知道的人可以在他们的牙齿,爬行动物会议上争论,但似乎(或多或少)同意哪个化石骨头应该放在哪个博物馆的抽屉里。不管把谁归到这一类,假种都已经存在了很长很长一段时间,并且包含了过去和现在的不同种类的分类群。在本月的《解剖学记录》特刊《伪槐古生物学和系统学的最新进展》中,伪槐的丰饶之处得到了精彩的展示。这期杂志的客座编辑是三位“伪科学爱好者”,他们长期以来一直热衷于拼凑这些非凡动物的过去:来自无与伦比的巴黎索邦大学(Sorbonne university)的pal生物研究中心的Mariana valia de Araújo Sena和Jorge Cubo;以及来自俄克拉荷马州塔尔萨市俄克拉荷马州立大学健康科学中心解剖学和细胞生物系的Holly Noelle Woodward (Sena等人,2025年)(图1)。这些研究人员代表了现代多面科学家,他们将比较生物学、骨组织学和生理学的研究融合在一起(经常发表在我们的杂志上;参见de Margerie et al., 2004;雨水等,2022;Cubo等人,2025;见鬼,伍德沃德,2025;伍德沃德,奥比尔,德塞纳,&;Cubo, 2025),他们对化石遗骸进行了深入的研究,以重建物种及其进化途径。这一期的论文来自于2023年7月在澳大利亚凯恩斯举行的国际脊椎动物形态学大会上,由三人组织的题为“Pseudosuchia古生物学特征的古组织学推论”的研讨会上的核心报告。 这篇社论的合著者希瑟·史密斯(Heather Smith)把自己从烤架上的虾中抽离出来,被这些假故事迷住了,并打开了一扇门,将他们的科学指导给了我们的杂志。合著者杰夫·莱特曼(Jeff Laitman)在库博教授和塞纳教授位于巴黎著名的索邦大学(Sorbonne)的住所与他们达成了协议,他用他祖先的高卢魅力说服他们,他们心爱的伪君子最适合在《解剖记录》(the解剖记录)的化石友好页面中找到。从他们是谁,到他们如何移动,到他们的身体在个体发育和整个进化史中如何变形和变化,到他们的热生理,当然,还有他们的系统发育关系,这篇新颖的特刊深入研究了假类动物的世界。所以,即使你不了解爬行动物和古猿分类、古生物学和系统学的所有复杂性,你也会喜欢并从这本新颖的特刊中学到东西。而且,你会想要将“伪这样的人”改名为“公理这样的人”,也就是说,“有价值的”这样的人。所有的“杀人”鲸、“飞”狐、豚鼠和其他不受尊重的脊椎动物已经在欢呼了!杰弗里·莱特曼:写作-原稿;概念化;调查;项目管理。Heather F. Smith:写作-评论和编辑;概念化;项目管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Nothing “pseudo” about the Pseudosuchia—members of this extraordinary clade thunder again into the pages of The Anatomical Record

Nothing “pseudo” about the Pseudosuchia—members of this extraordinary clade thunder again into the pages of The Anatomical Record

Some animal groups have the right to ask the press for a do-over: “killer” whales, while clearly not vegans, are family-oriented giants who show caring and compassion; guinea “pigs,” while a bit pudgy in appearance, are rodents and in no evolutionary way cousins of pigs; likewise, prairie “dogs” are not related to a human's best friend and are rather cousins of New York City's formidable sewer rats; and the only flying “foxes” are probably the poor critters that were scared to death being hunted by hordes of English nobles, with such animals actually being fruit bats of the order Chiroptera. And, Pseudosuchia is also disrespectfully named, damning a host of varied reptiles to be labeled as some sort of “less than” or “false” relatives of crocodiles when they are not.

First off, a disclaimer: the authors of this editorial were weaned in the study of primates, that is, humans and our kin, monkeys, apes, and all historical relatives. Studying their history is, truthfully, not that difficult. Basically, everything revolves around us and who is most like us. Direct human-like relatives started to come about likely during the Miocene epoch, some 8–10 mya, and all of our primate-like relatives came creeping out from under tree stumps when the non-avian dinosaurs died out and mammals took over around 65 mya in the late Cretaceous. Easy stuff, really.

Now, when it gets to who's who in the world of reptiles and their relatives—that is another story, and one you really have to be “in-the-know” to really know. Reptiles and the varied cousins began their path sometime in the remarkable Triassic period of the Mesozoic era that started some 251 million years ago (mya) at the end of the Permian Period of the Paleozoic Era (for a glimpse into the extraordinary diversity of life forms in the Triassic see the recent Anatomical Record Special Issue, “The Dawn of an Era: New Contributions on Comparative and Functional Anatomy of Triassic Tetrapods,” Pinheiro, Pretto, Kerber, 2024; Laitman & Smith, 2024). The term “Pseudosuchia” was created by German paleontologist Karl Alfred von Zittel in 1887–1890 (see Von Zittel, 1901) and used to identify a grouping of somewhat, or superficially, “crocodile-like” (pseudos meaning false, souchos meaning crocodile in ancient Greek) prehistoric Triassic reptiles of the clade Archosauria. The term Pseudosuchia was used to differentiate these superficially “crocodile-like” archosaurs from the more “bird-like” archosaurs often referred to as Avemetatarsalia. Over the years since the clade was anointed, numerous changes have occurred in fossil reptilian taxonomy and phylogeny. Groups have crept in and swam out; indeed, today, true crocodilians are frequently defined as a subset of Pseudosuchia (for a detailed dining experience on all things crocodilian, see the recent Anatomical Record Special Issue, The Age of Crocodilians and their kin: Their Anatomy, Physiology and Evolution, Holliday & Schachner, 2022; Laitman & Smith, 2022). So, there you have it: groups that were originally thought to be “false” crocodiles were originally the reason for creating the Pseudosuchia, but now true crocodiles are put within Pseudosuchia. Got it; never-mind. Those who know can argue about it at their toothy, reptile meetings, yet seem to agree (more or less) on which fossil bones go into which museum drawers.

Misnomers to the side, pseudosuchians—whomever gets placed in them—have been around a long, long while and contain an extraordinary diversity of taxa past and present. This cornucopia of all things pseudosuchian is beautifully on display in this month's special issue of The Anatomical Record, “Recent Advances in Pseudosuchia Paleobiology and Systematics.” The issue has been Guest edited by a trio of pseudosuchia-philes who have long had a love for piecing together the past of these extraordinary animals: Mariana Valéria de Araújo Sena and Jorge Cubo, both from the Centre de recherche en paléontologie, Sorbonne Université, in the incomparable city of Paris; and Holly Noelle Woodward from the Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences at the also fascinating all-American city of Tulsa, Oklahoma (Sena et al., 2025) (Figure 1). These investigators represent the modern multifaceted species of scientists who blend their research on comparative biology, bone histology, and physiology (often published in our journal; see, e.g., de Margerie et al., 2004; Rainwater et al., 2022; Cubo et al., 2025; Heck & Woodward, 2025; Woodward, Aubier, de Sena, & Cubo, 2025) with their intense examination of fossil remains to reconstruct species and their pathways. The papers in this issue came from a core of presentations at a July 2023 symposium organized by the trio entitled “Paleohistological Inferences of Paleobiological Traits in Pseudosuchia” held at the International Congress of Vertebrate Morphology in Cairns, Australia. Co-author of this editorial, Heather Smith, pulled herself away from shrimps on the barbie, enthralled by the pseudosuchia tales, and opened the door to directing their science towards our journal. Co-author, Jeff Laitman, sealed the deal with Professors Cubo and Sena at their Paris dwellings at the legendary Sorbonne, using his ancestral Gallic charm to convince them that their beloved pseudosuchians would be most at home within the fossil friendly pages of The Anatomical Record.

From who they were, to how they moved, to how their bodies morphed and changed during ontogeny and throughout their evolutionary history, to their thermo-physiology, to, of course, their phylogenetic relationships, this novel Special Issue drills down into the world of the pseudosuchians. So, even if you are not up on all the intricacies of reptilian and archosaurian classification, paleobiology, and systematics you will enjoy and learn from this novel special issue. And, you will emerge wanting to rename the “pseudo-suchians” the “axio-suchians,” that is, the “worthy” suchians. All of the “killer” whales, “flying” foxes, guinea “pigs,” and other disrespected vertebrates are already cheering!

Jeffrey T. Laitman: Writing – original draft; conceptualization; investigation; project administration. Heather F. Smith: Writing – review and editing; conceptualization; project administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
15.00%
发文量
266
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Anatomical Record
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信