Mohammad Reza Movahed, Kyvan Irannejad, Emma Venard, Luke Keating, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh
{"title":"植入乳房的妇女有较高的调整异常心脏检查和冠状动脉造影,但较低的冠状动脉介入治疗。","authors":"Mohammad Reza Movahed, Kyvan Irannejad, Emma Venard, Luke Keating, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.12.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast implants interfere with myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) and echocardiographic windows leading to increased false positive results. To validate this concept, we hypothesized that patients with breast implants should have higher positive cardiac testing and coronary angiogram with lower percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates compared to women without a breast implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using ICD 10 codes for breast implants, abnormal results of cardiac functional study, coronary angiogram, and percutaneous coronary interventions, we evaluated any association between these parameters in adult women with breast implants utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45,015 women had abnormal cardiac functional studies. A total of 1,871,335 women 18 or older underwent coronary angiography. From those, 865,020 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Women with breast implants with abnormal cardiac functional tests were 10 years younger (55.06 vs 65.06 years, p<0.001). Furthermore, the breast implant cohort had a higher adjusted abnormal cardiac functional study (OR1.78, CI 1.11-2.26, p=0.02). Adult women with breast implants also had a significantly higher rate of adjusted coronary angiography (OR: 1.3, CI: 1.17-1.44, P<0.001) but a lower rate of PCI (35.7% vs 46.2%, P<0.001, unadjusted OR: 0.65, CI 0.54-0.78, adjusted OR 0.79, CI 0.65-0.98, P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with breast implants had higher adjusted positive cardiac functional studies, and a higher adjusted rate of coronary angiography but lower rates of PCI consistent with our hypothesis that breast implant interference can increase abnormal cardiac testing leading to an increase in the utilization of coronary angiography.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women with breast implants have higher adjusted abnormal cardiac testing and coronary angiography but lower coronary intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Reza Movahed, Kyvan Irannejad, Emma Venard, Luke Keating, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.12.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast implants interfere with myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) and echocardiographic windows leading to increased false positive results. To validate this concept, we hypothesized that patients with breast implants should have higher positive cardiac testing and coronary angiogram with lower percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates compared to women without a breast implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using ICD 10 codes for breast implants, abnormal results of cardiac functional study, coronary angiogram, and percutaneous coronary interventions, we evaluated any association between these parameters in adult women with breast implants utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 45,015 women had abnormal cardiac functional studies. A total of 1,871,335 women 18 or older underwent coronary angiography. From those, 865,020 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Women with breast implants with abnormal cardiac functional tests were 10 years younger (55.06 vs 65.06 years, p<0.001). Furthermore, the breast implant cohort had a higher adjusted abnormal cardiac functional study (OR1.78, CI 1.11-2.26, p=0.02). Adult women with breast implants also had a significantly higher rate of adjusted coronary angiography (OR: 1.3, CI: 1.17-1.44, P<0.001) but a lower rate of PCI (35.7% vs 46.2%, P<0.001, unadjusted OR: 0.65, CI 0.54-0.78, adjusted OR 0.79, CI 0.65-0.98, P=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with breast implants had higher adjusted positive cardiac functional studies, and a higher adjusted rate of coronary angiography but lower rates of PCI consistent with our hypothesis that breast implant interference can increase abnormal cardiac testing leading to an increase in the utilization of coronary angiography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.12.027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.12.027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Women with breast implants have higher adjusted abnormal cardiac testing and coronary angiography but lower coronary intervention.
Background: Breast implants interfere with myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) and echocardiographic windows leading to increased false positive results. To validate this concept, we hypothesized that patients with breast implants should have higher positive cardiac testing and coronary angiogram with lower percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates compared to women without a breast implant.
Methods: Using ICD 10 codes for breast implants, abnormal results of cardiac functional study, coronary angiogram, and percutaneous coronary interventions, we evaluated any association between these parameters in adult women with breast implants utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.
Results: A total of 45,015 women had abnormal cardiac functional studies. A total of 1,871,335 women 18 or older underwent coronary angiography. From those, 865,020 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Women with breast implants with abnormal cardiac functional tests were 10 years younger (55.06 vs 65.06 years, p<0.001). Furthermore, the breast implant cohort had a higher adjusted abnormal cardiac functional study (OR1.78, CI 1.11-2.26, p=0.02). Adult women with breast implants also had a significantly higher rate of adjusted coronary angiography (OR: 1.3, CI: 1.17-1.44, P<0.001) but a lower rate of PCI (35.7% vs 46.2%, P<0.001, unadjusted OR: 0.65, CI 0.54-0.78, adjusted OR 0.79, CI 0.65-0.98, P=0.01).
Conclusions: Women with breast implants had higher adjusted positive cardiac functional studies, and a higher adjusted rate of coronary angiography but lower rates of PCI consistent with our hypothesis that breast implant interference can increase abnormal cardiac testing leading to an increase in the utilization of coronary angiography.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.