人工智能在空间医学场景中帮助新手用户保留护理点超声技能。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Victoria S Hurd, Michael Del Valle, Victoria G Kravets, Arian L Anderson, Nhu-Nguyen Le, John L Kendall, Allison P Hayman, Matthew Riscinti
{"title":"人工智能在空间医学场景中帮助新手用户保留护理点超声技能。","authors":"Victoria S Hurd, Michael Del Valle, Victoria G Kravets, Arian L Anderson, Nhu-Nguyen Le, John L Kendall, Allison P Hayman, Matthew Riscinti","doi":"10.1177/10806032241304441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As humanity progresses further into space, astronauts must be increasingly independent from mission control, especially in high-consequence medical scenarios. The high-utility and low-mass nature of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) makes this imaging modality ideal for spaceflight mission deployment. However, POCUS operator skill degrades over time, presenting an operational barrier to continuous, effective use. Further, formal medical education and POCUS-specific training are not requirements for astronaut candidates, potentially exacerbating skill degradation. Artificial intelligence (AI) assistance may mitigate skill decay, enabling long-term POCUS skill retention. To characterize the utility of this paradigm in space, we evaluated AI assistance effects on POCUS skill retention in subject pools with astronaut-mimicking educational demographics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 30 participants, evenly split into unassisted and AI-assisted cohorts. After undergoing 1 training session, participants collected 5 renal images, bladder images, and bladder volume estimations and completed usability and self-confidence surveys immediately, 2 wk, and 8 wk after initial training. Primary outcomes included target organ capture rates, image quality, bladder volume variability, perceived self-confidence, and perceived system usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI assistance minimized bladder volume variability aggregated over time (<i>P</i>=0.004) and 2 wk after training (<i>P</i>=0.009) and mitigated perceived system usability degradation with time (<i>P</i>=0.04). No trends were found in organ-capture abilities, image quality, or self-confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS AI decreased bladder volume variability and mitigated system usability decrement. We recommend increasing study duration or reducing the number of data collections in future study designs and the fieldwide adoption of objective ultrasound image-quality metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032241304441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Assistance in Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skill Retention for Novice Users in Space Medicine Scenarios.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria S Hurd, Michael Del Valle, Victoria G Kravets, Arian L Anderson, Nhu-Nguyen Le, John L Kendall, Allison P Hayman, Matthew Riscinti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10806032241304441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As humanity progresses further into space, astronauts must be increasingly independent from mission control, especially in high-consequence medical scenarios. The high-utility and low-mass nature of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) makes this imaging modality ideal for spaceflight mission deployment. However, POCUS operator skill degrades over time, presenting an operational barrier to continuous, effective use. Further, formal medical education and POCUS-specific training are not requirements for astronaut candidates, potentially exacerbating skill degradation. Artificial intelligence (AI) assistance may mitigate skill decay, enabling long-term POCUS skill retention. To characterize the utility of this paradigm in space, we evaluated AI assistance effects on POCUS skill retention in subject pools with astronaut-mimicking educational demographics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 30 participants, evenly split into unassisted and AI-assisted cohorts. After undergoing 1 training session, participants collected 5 renal images, bladder images, and bladder volume estimations and completed usability and self-confidence surveys immediately, 2 wk, and 8 wk after initial training. Primary outcomes included target organ capture rates, image quality, bladder volume variability, perceived self-confidence, and perceived system usability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI assistance minimized bladder volume variability aggregated over time (<i>P</i>=0.004) and 2 wk after training (<i>P</i>=0.009) and mitigated perceived system usability degradation with time (<i>P</i>=0.04). No trends were found in organ-capture abilities, image quality, or self-confidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS AI decreased bladder volume variability and mitigated system usability decrement. We recommend increasing study duration or reducing the number of data collections in future study designs and the fieldwide adoption of objective ultrasound image-quality metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10806032241304441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032241304441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032241304441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:随着人类向太空的进一步发展,宇航员必须越来越独立于任务控制,特别是在高后果的医疗场景中。点护理超声(POCUS)的高实用性和低质量特性使这种成像方式成为航天任务部署的理想选择。然而,随着时间的推移,POCUS操作人员的技能会下降,这对持续有效的使用构成了操作障碍。此外,正式的医学教育和专门针对pocuss的培训不是对宇航员候选人的要求,这可能会加剧技能退化。人工智能(AI)辅助可以减轻技能衰减,实现长期POCUS技能保留。为了描述这一范式在太空中的效用,我们评估了人工智能辅助对模拟宇航员教育人口统计学的学科池中POCUS技能保留的影响。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究包括30名参与者,平均分为无辅助组和人工智能辅助组。经过1次训练后,参与者收集5张肾脏图像、膀胱图像和膀胱体积估算,并在初始训练后第2周和第8周完成可用性和自信心调查。主要结果包括靶器官捕获率、图像质量、膀胱体积变异性、感知自信和感知系统可用性。结果:人工智能辅助最小化了膀胱容量随时间(P=0.004)和训练后2周(P=0.009)累积的变异性,并减轻了感知系统可用性随时间的退化(P=0.04)。在器官捕获能力、图像质量或自信心方面没有发现任何趋势。结论:POCUS AI降低了膀胱容量变异性,减轻了系统可用性下降。我们建议在未来的研究设计中增加研究时间或减少数据收集的数量,并在整个领域采用客观的超声图像质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Assistance in Point-of-Care Ultrasound Skill Retention for Novice Users in Space Medicine Scenarios.

Introduction: As humanity progresses further into space, astronauts must be increasingly independent from mission control, especially in high-consequence medical scenarios. The high-utility and low-mass nature of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) makes this imaging modality ideal for spaceflight mission deployment. However, POCUS operator skill degrades over time, presenting an operational barrier to continuous, effective use. Further, formal medical education and POCUS-specific training are not requirements for astronaut candidates, potentially exacerbating skill degradation. Artificial intelligence (AI) assistance may mitigate skill decay, enabling long-term POCUS skill retention. To characterize the utility of this paradigm in space, we evaluated AI assistance effects on POCUS skill retention in subject pools with astronaut-mimicking educational demographics.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 30 participants, evenly split into unassisted and AI-assisted cohorts. After undergoing 1 training session, participants collected 5 renal images, bladder images, and bladder volume estimations and completed usability and self-confidence surveys immediately, 2 wk, and 8 wk after initial training. Primary outcomes included target organ capture rates, image quality, bladder volume variability, perceived self-confidence, and perceived system usability.

Results: AI assistance minimized bladder volume variability aggregated over time (P=0.004) and 2 wk after training (P=0.009) and mitigated perceived system usability degradation with time (P=0.04). No trends were found in organ-capture abilities, image quality, or self-confidence.

Conclusion: POCUS AI decreased bladder volume variability and mitigated system usability decrement. We recommend increasing study duration or reducing the number of data collections in future study designs and the fieldwide adoption of objective ultrasound image-quality metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信