COVID-19大流行前和期间纽约市初级保健机构青少年心理健康调查

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s10995-024-04037-8
Deanna Hano, Anjile An, Jodie Nghiem, Elizabeth Koh, Vidushi Tripathi, Rachel Wirtshafter, Cori Green
{"title":"COVID-19大流行前和期间纽约市初级保健机构青少年心理健康调查","authors":"Deanna Hano, Anjile An, Jodie Nghiem, Elizabeth Koh, Vidushi Tripathi, Rachel Wirtshafter, Cori Green","doi":"10.1007/s10995-024-04037-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate differences in the prevalence of positive depression screens before and during the COVID-19 pandemic within primary care and assess patient characteristics based on depression screen results in both time periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ages 12-21 years-old from two urban primary care clinics seen for well-child visits and who had completed depression screens before and during the pandemic. Additional variables evaluated included demographics, substance use, and mental health (MH) conditions such as anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation (SI). Paired analyses using McNemar's Chi-squared test and paired t-test evaluated differences in variables between time periods. Patients were also categorized into four groups determined by their depression screen result in each period and characteristics between the four groups were compared using the Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1621 patient charts reviewed with documented depression screens, there were 232 patients who had screens completed during both time periods. Twenty three (9.9%) patients screened positive for depressive symptoms before the pandemic and 38 (16.4%) screened positive during the pandemic. More patients had SI, depression, anxiety, and substance use during the pandemic. Patients who had at least one positive depression screen had more MH conditions than patients who had negative depression screens during both time periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among a cohort of adolescents seen in primary care before and during the pandemic, more patients screened positive for depression and there were more MH conditions during the pandemic, demonstrating a need to prioritize MH resources for adolescents in the primary care setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"156-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Investigation of Adolescent Mental Health In a New York City Cohort Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Primary Care Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Deanna Hano, Anjile An, Jodie Nghiem, Elizabeth Koh, Vidushi Tripathi, Rachel Wirtshafter, Cori Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10995-024-04037-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate differences in the prevalence of positive depression screens before and during the COVID-19 pandemic within primary care and assess patient characteristics based on depression screen results in both time periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ages 12-21 years-old from two urban primary care clinics seen for well-child visits and who had completed depression screens before and during the pandemic. Additional variables evaluated included demographics, substance use, and mental health (MH) conditions such as anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation (SI). Paired analyses using McNemar's Chi-squared test and paired t-test evaluated differences in variables between time periods. Patients were also categorized into four groups determined by their depression screen result in each period and characteristics between the four groups were compared using the Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1621 patient charts reviewed with documented depression screens, there were 232 patients who had screens completed during both time periods. Twenty three (9.9%) patients screened positive for depressive symptoms before the pandemic and 38 (16.4%) screened positive during the pandemic. More patients had SI, depression, anxiety, and substance use during the pandemic. Patients who had at least one positive depression screen had more MH conditions than patients who had negative depression screens during both time periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among a cohort of adolescents seen in primary care before and during the pandemic, more patients screened positive for depression and there were more MH conditions during the pandemic, demonstrating a need to prioritize MH resources for adolescents in the primary care setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"156-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-04037-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-024-04037-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:调查在COVID-19大流行之前和期间初级保健中抑郁症筛查阳性的流行率的差异,并根据两个时间段的抑郁症筛查结果评估患者特征。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是来自两个城市初级保健诊所的12-21岁的儿童,他们在大流行之前和期间接受过抑郁症筛查。评估的其他变量包括人口统计学、物质使用和精神健康状况(MH),如焦虑、抑郁和自杀意念(SI)。使用McNemar的卡方检验和配对t检验的配对分析评估了不同时期变量的差异。根据每个时期的抑郁筛查结果,患者也被分为四组,四组之间的特征使用Fisher精确测试进行比较。结果:在1621例抑郁症筛查记录的患者图表中,有232例患者在两个时间段内完成了筛查。23名(9.9%)患者在大流行前抑郁症状筛查呈阳性,38名(16.4%)患者在大流行期间筛查呈阳性。在大流行期间,更多的患者出现SI、抑郁、焦虑和药物使用。在两个时间段内,至少有一次抑郁筛查呈阳性的患者比抑郁筛查呈阴性的患者有更多的MH状况。结论:在大流行之前和期间在初级保健中看到的青少年队列中,更多的患者筛查为抑郁症阳性,并且在大流行期间有更多的MH情况,这表明需要优先考虑初级保健机构中青少年的MH资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Investigation of Adolescent Mental Health In a New York City Cohort Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Primary Care Setting.

Objectives: To investigate differences in the prevalence of positive depression screens before and during the COVID-19 pandemic within primary care and assess patient characteristics based on depression screen results in both time periods.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ages 12-21 years-old from two urban primary care clinics seen for well-child visits and who had completed depression screens before and during the pandemic. Additional variables evaluated included demographics, substance use, and mental health (MH) conditions such as anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation (SI). Paired analyses using McNemar's Chi-squared test and paired t-test evaluated differences in variables between time periods. Patients were also categorized into four groups determined by their depression screen result in each period and characteristics between the four groups were compared using the Fisher's exact test.

Results: Of 1621 patient charts reviewed with documented depression screens, there were 232 patients who had screens completed during both time periods. Twenty three (9.9%) patients screened positive for depressive symptoms before the pandemic and 38 (16.4%) screened positive during the pandemic. More patients had SI, depression, anxiety, and substance use during the pandemic. Patients who had at least one positive depression screen had more MH conditions than patients who had negative depression screens during both time periods.

Conclusions: Among a cohort of adolescents seen in primary care before and during the pandemic, more patients screened positive for depression and there were more MH conditions during the pandemic, demonstrating a need to prioritize MH resources for adolescents in the primary care setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信