Shengnan Ma, Hui Chang, Boping Yuan, Lilong Xu, Haiyan Wang
{"title":"汉语中风后失语症形容词和所有格标记的产生。","authors":"Shengnan Ma, Hui Chang, Boping Yuan, Lilong Xu, Haiyan Wang","doi":"10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has shown that patients with post-stroke aphasia may encounter difficulties in producing inflectional morphemes. Interestingly, they also show distinct challenges with the inflectional morphemes of homophones, such as the plural marker <i>s</i> and the possessive marker <i>'s</i> in English. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on morphemes in European languages. Inflectional morphemes that are homophones are common in Chinese. It is necessary to investigate whether Chinese speakers with post-stroke aphasia also show variable patterns of more or less impaired performance with the inflectional morphemes of homophones in Chinese. This study aimed to examine whether Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibit differential performance in producing the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i>, although they have identical pronunciation and written form. An elicitation task was administered on 20 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 20 healthy Chinese speakers. The results showed that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia produced the adjective marker <i>de</i> at a significantly higher accuracy rate than the possessive marker <i>de</i>, while nearly all the healthy Chinese speakers produced both the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i> correctly. This indicates that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibited superior production of the adjective marker <i>de</i> compared to the possessive marker <i>de</i>. This discrepancy in performance may be attributed to the more complex syntactic structure associated with the possessive marker <i>de</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":49219,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production of the adjective and possessive markers <i>de</i> in Chinese post-stroke aphasia.\",\"authors\":\"Shengnan Ma, Hui Chang, Boping Yuan, Lilong Xu, Haiyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research has shown that patients with post-stroke aphasia may encounter difficulties in producing inflectional morphemes. Interestingly, they also show distinct challenges with the inflectional morphemes of homophones, such as the plural marker <i>s</i> and the possessive marker <i>'s</i> in English. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on morphemes in European languages. Inflectional morphemes that are homophones are common in Chinese. It is necessary to investigate whether Chinese speakers with post-stroke aphasia also show variable patterns of more or less impaired performance with the inflectional morphemes of homophones in Chinese. This study aimed to examine whether Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibit differential performance in producing the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i>, although they have identical pronunciation and written form. An elicitation task was administered on 20 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 20 healthy Chinese speakers. The results showed that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia produced the adjective marker <i>de</i> at a significantly higher accuracy rate than the possessive marker <i>de</i>, while nearly all the healthy Chinese speakers produced both the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i> correctly. This indicates that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibited superior production of the adjective marker <i>de</i> compared to the possessive marker <i>de</i>. This discrepancy in performance may be attributed to the more complex syntactic structure associated with the possessive marker <i>de</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Production of the adjective and possessive markers de in Chinese post-stroke aphasia.
Research has shown that patients with post-stroke aphasia may encounter difficulties in producing inflectional morphemes. Interestingly, they also show distinct challenges with the inflectional morphemes of homophones, such as the plural marker s and the possessive marker 's in English. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on morphemes in European languages. Inflectional morphemes that are homophones are common in Chinese. It is necessary to investigate whether Chinese speakers with post-stroke aphasia also show variable patterns of more or less impaired performance with the inflectional morphemes of homophones in Chinese. This study aimed to examine whether Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibit differential performance in producing the adjective marker de and the possessive marker de, although they have identical pronunciation and written form. An elicitation task was administered on 20 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 20 healthy Chinese speakers. The results showed that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia produced the adjective marker de at a significantly higher accuracy rate than the possessive marker de, while nearly all the healthy Chinese speakers produced both the adjective marker de and the possessive marker de correctly. This indicates that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibited superior production of the adjective marker de compared to the possessive marker de. This discrepancy in performance may be attributed to the more complex syntactic structure associated with the possessive marker de.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics encompasses the following:
Linguistics and phonetics of disorders of speech and language;
Contribution of data from communication disorders to theories of speech production and perception;
Research on communication disorders in multilingual populations, and in under-researched populations, and languages other than English;
Pragmatic aspects of speech and language disorders;
Clinical dialectology and sociolinguistics;
Childhood, adolescent and adult disorders of communication;
Linguistics and phonetics of hearing impairment, sign language and lip-reading.