汉语中风后失语症形容词和所有格标记的产生。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Shengnan Ma, Hui Chang, Boping Yuan, Lilong Xu, Haiyan Wang
{"title":"汉语中风后失语症形容词和所有格标记的产生。","authors":"Shengnan Ma, Hui Chang, Boping Yuan, Lilong Xu, Haiyan Wang","doi":"10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research has shown that patients with post-stroke aphasia may encounter difficulties in producing inflectional morphemes. Interestingly, they also show distinct challenges with the inflectional morphemes of homophones, such as the plural marker <i>s</i> and the possessive marker <i>'s</i> in English. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on morphemes in European languages. Inflectional morphemes that are homophones are common in Chinese. It is necessary to investigate whether Chinese speakers with post-stroke aphasia also show variable patterns of more or less impaired performance with the inflectional morphemes of homophones in Chinese. This study aimed to examine whether Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibit differential performance in producing the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i>, although they have identical pronunciation and written form. An elicitation task was administered on 20 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 20 healthy Chinese speakers. The results showed that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia produced the adjective marker <i>de</i> at a significantly higher accuracy rate than the possessive marker <i>de</i>, while nearly all the healthy Chinese speakers produced both the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i> correctly. This indicates that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibited superior production of the adjective marker <i>de</i> compared to the possessive marker <i>de</i>. This discrepancy in performance may be attributed to the more complex syntactic structure associated with the possessive marker <i>de</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":49219,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production of the adjective and possessive markers <i>de</i> in Chinese post-stroke aphasia.\",\"authors\":\"Shengnan Ma, Hui Chang, Boping Yuan, Lilong Xu, Haiyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Research has shown that patients with post-stroke aphasia may encounter difficulties in producing inflectional morphemes. Interestingly, they also show distinct challenges with the inflectional morphemes of homophones, such as the plural marker <i>s</i> and the possessive marker <i>'s</i> in English. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on morphemes in European languages. Inflectional morphemes that are homophones are common in Chinese. It is necessary to investigate whether Chinese speakers with post-stroke aphasia also show variable patterns of more or less impaired performance with the inflectional morphemes of homophones in Chinese. This study aimed to examine whether Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibit differential performance in producing the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i>, although they have identical pronunciation and written form. An elicitation task was administered on 20 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 20 healthy Chinese speakers. The results showed that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia produced the adjective marker <i>de</i> at a significantly higher accuracy rate than the possessive marker <i>de</i>, while nearly all the healthy Chinese speakers produced both the adjective marker <i>de</i> and the possessive marker <i>de</i> correctly. This indicates that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibited superior production of the adjective marker <i>de</i> compared to the possessive marker <i>de</i>. This discrepancy in performance may be attributed to the more complex syntactic structure associated with the possessive marker <i>de</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2024.2447531","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,中风后失语症患者可能在产生屈折语素方面遇到困难。有趣的是,他们在同音异义词的词素上也表现出了明显的挑战,比如英语中的复数标记s和所有格标记s。然而,以往的研究主要集中在欧洲语言的语素上。屈折语素是汉语中常见的同音异义词。汉语卒中后失语症患者在汉语同音异义词素上是否也表现出不同程度的表现差异,值得进一步探讨。本研究旨在探讨汉语中风失语症患者在发音和书写形式相同的情况下,形容词标记词和所有格标记词的发音是否存在差异。对20例脑卒中后失语症患者和20例健康汉语使用者进行了启发任务。结果表明,汉语中风失语症患者的形容词标记词的正确率显著高于所有格标记词,而汉语健康人的形容词标记词和所有格标记词的正确率几乎一致。这表明汉语中风失语症患者的形容词标记物的生成优于所有格标记物,这种差异可能与所有格标记物的句法结构更为复杂有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Production of the adjective and possessive markers de in Chinese post-stroke aphasia.

Research has shown that patients with post-stroke aphasia may encounter difficulties in producing inflectional morphemes. Interestingly, they also show distinct challenges with the inflectional morphemes of homophones, such as the plural marker s and the possessive marker 's in English. However, previous studies have predominantly focused on morphemes in European languages. Inflectional morphemes that are homophones are common in Chinese. It is necessary to investigate whether Chinese speakers with post-stroke aphasia also show variable patterns of more or less impaired performance with the inflectional morphemes of homophones in Chinese. This study aimed to examine whether Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibit differential performance in producing the adjective marker de and the possessive marker de, although they have identical pronunciation and written form. An elicitation task was administered on 20 patients with post-stroke aphasia and 20 healthy Chinese speakers. The results showed that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia produced the adjective marker de at a significantly higher accuracy rate than the possessive marker de, while nearly all the healthy Chinese speakers produced both the adjective marker de and the possessive marker de correctly. This indicates that Chinese speakers with stroke aphasia exhibited superior production of the adjective marker de compared to the possessive marker de. This discrepancy in performance may be attributed to the more complex syntactic structure associated with the possessive marker de.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics encompasses the following: Linguistics and phonetics of disorders of speech and language; Contribution of data from communication disorders to theories of speech production and perception; Research on communication disorders in multilingual populations, and in under-researched populations, and languages other than English; Pragmatic aspects of speech and language disorders; Clinical dialectology and sociolinguistics; Childhood, adolescent and adult disorders of communication; Linguistics and phonetics of hearing impairment, sign language and lip-reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信