Ana Moreno, Sara Deza, Javier Salvador, Juan C Galofre, Álvaro González, Estibaliz Alegre
{"title":"甲氧氯普胺试验筛选减少中度高泌乳素血症患者不必要的垂体磁共振检查。","authors":"Ana Moreno, Sara Deza, Javier Salvador, Juan C Galofre, Álvaro González, Estibaliz Alegre","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In prolactinoma diagnosis, current guidelines recommend prolactin (PRL) assessment, considering values exceeding 200 ng/mL highly suggestive of prolactinoma. However, subtler hyperprolactinemia is more common, and to rule out potential prolactinomas, pituitary resonance magnetic imaging (MRI) studies are necessary. These present limitations in terms of availability, costs, and delays in diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the screening utility of the metoclopramide (MCP) test in identifying patients with moderate hyperprolactinemia for whom MRI studies might be unnecessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively selected patients with moderate hyperprolactinemia, with an MCP test and a pituitary MRI within the same assistance, and with no interfering pharmacological treatment. Increases in PRL (ΔPRLMax) and thyrotropin (ΔTSHMax) after MCP infusion were compared according to MRI findings: patients with microadenoma (<10 mm; n = 23), with macroadenoma (≥10 mm; n = 5), or without adenoma (n = 39).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔPRLMax exceeds baseline PRL capability to identify patients with an adenoma (area under the curve = 0.872 vs 0.776). ΔPRLMax below 220% identifies 100% of these patients with 71% of specificity. This screening would have avoided 42% of MRI, resulting in a cost savings of 34%. Analysis of ΔTSHMax only slightly increased specificity when considered as a secondary criterion. Test duration can be shortened to 30 min without compromising its screening capability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A short MCP test is a useful and cost-effective screening tool to avoid unnecessary MRI. Its simplicity allows its performance in almost any clinical facility to easily rule out prolactinoma in an important percentage of patients, something of upmost importance especially in regions where MRI facilities or their access are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"48-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening with Metoclopramide Test to Reduce Unnecessary Pituitary Magnetic Resonance Studies in Moderate Hyperprolactinemia.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Moreno, Sara Deza, Javier Salvador, Juan C Galofre, Álvaro González, Estibaliz Alegre\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfae123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In prolactinoma diagnosis, current guidelines recommend prolactin (PRL) assessment, considering values exceeding 200 ng/mL highly suggestive of prolactinoma. However, subtler hyperprolactinemia is more common, and to rule out potential prolactinomas, pituitary resonance magnetic imaging (MRI) studies are necessary. These present limitations in terms of availability, costs, and delays in diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the screening utility of the metoclopramide (MCP) test in identifying patients with moderate hyperprolactinemia for whom MRI studies might be unnecessary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively selected patients with moderate hyperprolactinemia, with an MCP test and a pituitary MRI within the same assistance, and with no interfering pharmacological treatment. Increases in PRL (ΔPRLMax) and thyrotropin (ΔTSHMax) after MCP infusion were compared according to MRI findings: patients with microadenoma (<10 mm; n = 23), with macroadenoma (≥10 mm; n = 5), or without adenoma (n = 39).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔPRLMax exceeds baseline PRL capability to identify patients with an adenoma (area under the curve = 0.872 vs 0.776). ΔPRLMax below 220% identifies 100% of these patients with 71% of specificity. This screening would have avoided 42% of MRI, resulting in a cost savings of 34%. Analysis of ΔTSHMax only slightly increased specificity when considered as a secondary criterion. Test duration can be shortened to 30 min without compromising its screening capability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A short MCP test is a useful and cost-effective screening tool to avoid unnecessary MRI. Its simplicity allows its performance in almost any clinical facility to easily rule out prolactinoma in an important percentage of patients, something of upmost importance especially in regions where MRI facilities or their access are limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"48-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在催乳素瘤的诊断中,目前的指南推荐评估催乳素(PRL),考虑到超过200 ng/mL的值高度提示催乳素瘤。然而,轻微的高催乳素血症更为常见,为了排除潜在的催乳素瘤,垂体磁共振成像(MRI)研究是必要的。这些在可获得性、成本和诊断延误方面存在局限性。我们的目的是评估甲氧氯普胺(MCP)试验在识别可能不需要MRI检查的中度高泌乳素血症患者中的筛选效用。方法:我们回顾性选择中度高泌乳素血症患者,在同一辅助下进行MCP检查和垂体MRI检查,并且没有干预药物治疗。根据MRI结果比较MCP输注后PRL (ΔPRLMax)和甲状腺激素(ΔTSHMax)的增加:微腺瘤患者(结果:ΔPRLMax超过了基线PRL识别腺瘤患者的能力(曲线下面积= 0.872 vs 0.776)。ΔPRLMax低于220%识别100%这些患者的特异性为71%。这种筛查可以避免42%的MRI检查,从而节省34%的成本。当将ΔTSHMax作为次要标准时,分析仅略微增加了特异性。测试持续时间可缩短至30分钟,而不影响其筛选能力。结论:短时间的MCP测试是一种有效且经济的筛查工具,可避免不必要的MRI检查。它的简单性使其在几乎任何临床机构中都能很容易地排除大部分患者的泌乳素瘤,这在MRI设备或其访问受限的地区尤为重要。
Screening with Metoclopramide Test to Reduce Unnecessary Pituitary Magnetic Resonance Studies in Moderate Hyperprolactinemia.
Background: In prolactinoma diagnosis, current guidelines recommend prolactin (PRL) assessment, considering values exceeding 200 ng/mL highly suggestive of prolactinoma. However, subtler hyperprolactinemia is more common, and to rule out potential prolactinomas, pituitary resonance magnetic imaging (MRI) studies are necessary. These present limitations in terms of availability, costs, and delays in diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the screening utility of the metoclopramide (MCP) test in identifying patients with moderate hyperprolactinemia for whom MRI studies might be unnecessary.
Methods: We retrospectively selected patients with moderate hyperprolactinemia, with an MCP test and a pituitary MRI within the same assistance, and with no interfering pharmacological treatment. Increases in PRL (ΔPRLMax) and thyrotropin (ΔTSHMax) after MCP infusion were compared according to MRI findings: patients with microadenoma (<10 mm; n = 23), with macroadenoma (≥10 mm; n = 5), or without adenoma (n = 39).
Results: ΔPRLMax exceeds baseline PRL capability to identify patients with an adenoma (area under the curve = 0.872 vs 0.776). ΔPRLMax below 220% identifies 100% of these patients with 71% of specificity. This screening would have avoided 42% of MRI, resulting in a cost savings of 34%. Analysis of ΔTSHMax only slightly increased specificity when considered as a secondary criterion. Test duration can be shortened to 30 min without compromising its screening capability.
Conclusions: A short MCP test is a useful and cost-effective screening tool to avoid unnecessary MRI. Its simplicity allows its performance in almost any clinical facility to easily rule out prolactinoma in an important percentage of patients, something of upmost importance especially in regions where MRI facilities or their access are limited.