社交媒体招聘作为脆弱性的潜在触发因素:多利益相关者访谈研究。

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.2196/52448
Nina Matthes, Theresa Willem, Alena Buyx, Bettina M Zimmermann
{"title":"社交媒体招聘作为脆弱性的潜在触发因素:多利益相关者访谈研究。","authors":"Nina Matthes, Theresa Willem, Alena Buyx, Bettina M Zimmermann","doi":"10.2196/52448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More clinical studies use social media to increase recruitment accrual. However, empirical analyses focusing on the ethical aspects pertinent when targeting patients with vulnerable characteristics are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore expert and patient perspectives on vulnerability in the context of social media recruitment and seeks to explore how social media can reduce or amplify vulnerabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of an international consortium that tests a therapeutic vaccine against hepatitis B (TherVacB), we conducted 30 qualitative interviews with multidisciplinary experts in social media recruitment (from the fields of clinical research, public relations, psychology, ethics, philosophy, law, and social sciences) about the ethical, legal, and social challenges of social media recruitment. We triangulated the expert assessments with the perceptions of 6 patients with hepatitis B regarding social media usage and attitudes relative to their diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experts perceived social media recruitment as beneficial for reaching hard-to-reach populations and preserving patient privacy. Features that may aggravate existing vulnerabilities are the acontextual point of contact, potential breaches of user privacy, biased algorithms disproportionately affecting disadvantaged groups, and technological barriers such as insufficient digital literacy skills and restricted access to relevant technology. We also report several practical recommendations from experts to navigate these triggering effects of social media recruitment, including transparent communication, addressing algorithm bias, privacy education, and multichannel recruitment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using social media for clinical study recruitment can mitigate and aggravate potential study participants' vulnerabilities. Researchers should anticipate and address the outlined triggering effects within this study's design and proactively define strategies to overcome them. We suggest practical recommendations to achieve this.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e52448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media Recruitment as a Potential Trigger for Vulnerability: Multistakeholder Interview Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Matthes, Theresa Willem, Alena Buyx, Bettina M Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/52448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More clinical studies use social media to increase recruitment accrual. However, empirical analyses focusing on the ethical aspects pertinent when targeting patients with vulnerable characteristics are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore expert and patient perspectives on vulnerability in the context of social media recruitment and seeks to explore how social media can reduce or amplify vulnerabilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of an international consortium that tests a therapeutic vaccine against hepatitis B (TherVacB), we conducted 30 qualitative interviews with multidisciplinary experts in social media recruitment (from the fields of clinical research, public relations, psychology, ethics, philosophy, law, and social sciences) about the ethical, legal, and social challenges of social media recruitment. We triangulated the expert assessments with the perceptions of 6 patients with hepatitis B regarding social media usage and attitudes relative to their diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experts perceived social media recruitment as beneficial for reaching hard-to-reach populations and preserving patient privacy. Features that may aggravate existing vulnerabilities are the acontextual point of contact, potential breaches of user privacy, biased algorithms disproportionately affecting disadvantaged groups, and technological barriers such as insufficient digital literacy skills and restricted access to relevant technology. We also report several practical recommendations from experts to navigate these triggering effects of social media recruitment, including transparent communication, addressing algorithm bias, privacy education, and multichannel recruitment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using social media for clinical study recruitment can mitigate and aggravate potential study participants' vulnerabilities. Researchers should anticipate and address the outlined triggering effects within this study's design and proactively define strategies to overcome them. We suggest practical recommendations to achieve this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e52448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/52448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的临床研究使用社交媒体来增加招募收益。然而,缺乏针对弱势特征患者的相关伦理方面的实证分析。目的:本研究旨在探讨专家和患者对社交媒体招聘背景下脆弱性的看法,并试图探讨社交媒体如何减少或放大脆弱性。方法:作为测试乙型肝炎治疗性疫苗(TherVacB)的国际联盟的一部分,我们对社交媒体招聘的多学科专家(来自临床研究、公共关系、心理学、伦理学、哲学、法律和社会科学领域)进行了30次定性访谈,内容涉及社交媒体招聘的伦理、法律和社会挑战。我们将专家评估与6名乙型肝炎患者对社交媒体使用的看法和与诊断相关的态度进行了三角分析。结果:专家认为社交媒体招聘有利于接触到难以接触到的人群,并保护患者隐私。可能加剧现有漏洞的特征是:背景接触点、对用户隐私的潜在侵犯、对弱势群体造成不成比例影响的有偏见的算法,以及诸如数字素养不足和限制获取相关技术等技术障碍。我们还报告了专家提出的一些实用建议,以应对社交媒体招聘的这些触发效应,包括透明沟通、解决算法偏见、隐私教育和多渠道招聘。结论:在临床研究招募中使用社交媒体可以减轻和加剧潜在研究参与者的脆弱性。研究人员应该在本研究的设计中预测和解决概述的触发效应,并积极地确定克服它们的策略。为此,我们提出切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Media Recruitment as a Potential Trigger for Vulnerability: Multistakeholder Interview Study.

Background: More clinical studies use social media to increase recruitment accrual. However, empirical analyses focusing on the ethical aspects pertinent when targeting patients with vulnerable characteristics are lacking.

Objective: This study aims to explore expert and patient perspectives on vulnerability in the context of social media recruitment and seeks to explore how social media can reduce or amplify vulnerabilities.

Methods: As part of an international consortium that tests a therapeutic vaccine against hepatitis B (TherVacB), we conducted 30 qualitative interviews with multidisciplinary experts in social media recruitment (from the fields of clinical research, public relations, psychology, ethics, philosophy, law, and social sciences) about the ethical, legal, and social challenges of social media recruitment. We triangulated the expert assessments with the perceptions of 6 patients with hepatitis B regarding social media usage and attitudes relative to their diagnosis.

Results: Experts perceived social media recruitment as beneficial for reaching hard-to-reach populations and preserving patient privacy. Features that may aggravate existing vulnerabilities are the acontextual point of contact, potential breaches of user privacy, biased algorithms disproportionately affecting disadvantaged groups, and technological barriers such as insufficient digital literacy skills and restricted access to relevant technology. We also report several practical recommendations from experts to navigate these triggering effects of social media recruitment, including transparent communication, addressing algorithm bias, privacy education, and multichannel recruitment.

Conclusions: Using social media for clinical study recruitment can mitigate and aggravate potential study participants' vulnerabilities. Researchers should anticipate and address the outlined triggering effects within this study's design and proactively define strategies to overcome them. We suggest practical recommendations to achieve this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信