农村静脉曲张患者静脉血栓栓塞发生率及处理回顾性分析。

Shivani Thakur, Kamalpreet Kaur, Sandhini Agarwal, Fatima Zabiba, Hussein Maatouk, Ahmed Zabiba, Jasmin Dominguez Cervantes, Tiffany Huang, Ahmadzaki Arjmand, Ahmadzakaria Arjmand, Keshav Kumar
{"title":"农村静脉曲张患者静脉血栓栓塞发生率及处理回顾性分析。","authors":"Shivani Thakur, Kamalpreet Kaur, Sandhini Agarwal, Fatima Zabiba, Hussein Maatouk, Ahmed Zabiba, Jasmin Dominguez Cervantes, Tiffany Huang, Ahmadzaki Arjmand, Ahmadzakaria Arjmand, Keshav Kumar","doi":"10.1177/02683555241313272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine the rate of incidence, risk factors, and management for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for varicose veins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All charts of patients undergoing venous ablation from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed at a rural vein treatment clinic. The incidence of VTE was noted and a chart review was completed to identify risk factors for VTE, EHIT score, EFIT score, and management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients underwent 14,172 UGFS procedures and 4865 RFAs. VTE was noted in 45 patients (0.24%), with no pulmonary embolisms and no fatal outcomes among the patient population. Patients diagnosed with VTE had a median CEAP score of 3 and a modified Caprini risk score of 7.2. Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with prior history of DVT, patients undergoing UGFS, patients with higher Caprini scores. 90% of patients diagnosed with VTE had a prior history of DVT (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients who received UGFS treatments had a higher modified Caprini Risk Score than patients who received an RFA and UGFS, 8.7 and 6.8 respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with swollen legs prior to treatment (0.92%), visible varicose veins (0.92%), obesity (0.49%), and surgery within the prior 3 months to vein treatment (0.41%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified Caprini score is a useful tool for risk stratification for VTE and its incidence is low for patients undergoing RFA and UGFS. Prior history of VTE represents a significant risk for recurrence in patients undergoing RFA and UGFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555241313272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective chart review of venous thromboembolism incidence and management in rural patients undergoing varicose vein treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Shivani Thakur, Kamalpreet Kaur, Sandhini Agarwal, Fatima Zabiba, Hussein Maatouk, Ahmed Zabiba, Jasmin Dominguez Cervantes, Tiffany Huang, Ahmadzaki Arjmand, Ahmadzakaria Arjmand, Keshav Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555241313272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine the rate of incidence, risk factors, and management for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for varicose veins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All charts of patients undergoing venous ablation from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed at a rural vein treatment clinic. The incidence of VTE was noted and a chart review was completed to identify risk factors for VTE, EHIT score, EFIT score, and management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients underwent 14,172 UGFS procedures and 4865 RFAs. VTE was noted in 45 patients (0.24%), with no pulmonary embolisms and no fatal outcomes among the patient population. Patients diagnosed with VTE had a median CEAP score of 3 and a modified Caprini risk score of 7.2. Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with prior history of DVT, patients undergoing UGFS, patients with higher Caprini scores. 90% of patients diagnosed with VTE had a prior history of DVT (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients who received UGFS treatments had a higher modified Caprini Risk Score than patients who received an RFA and UGFS, 8.7 and 6.8 respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with swollen legs prior to treatment (0.92%), visible varicose veins (0.92%), obesity (0.49%), and surgery within the prior 3 months to vein treatment (0.41%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified Caprini score is a useful tool for risk stratification for VTE and its incidence is low for patients undergoing RFA and UGFS. Prior history of VTE represents a significant risk for recurrence in patients undergoing RFA and UGFS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555241313272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241313272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241313272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定接受射频消融(RFA)和超声引导泡沫硬化治疗(UGFS)的静脉曲张患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的发生率、危险因素和处理方法。方法:回顾性分析某农村静脉治疗门诊2016 - 2023年静脉消融患者病历。记录静脉血栓栓塞的发生率,并完成图表回顾,以确定静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素、EHIT评分、EFIT评分和管理。结果:患者接受了14172例UGFS和4865例rfa。45例(0.24%)患者发生静脉血栓栓塞,无肺栓塞,无致死性结局。诊断为静脉血栓栓塞的患者CEAP评分中位数为3分,改良capriti风险评分为7.2分。有DVT病史的患者、接受UGFS的患者、capriti评分较高的患者发生VTE的风险增加。诊断为静脉血栓栓塞的患者中90%有静脉血栓栓塞病史(p < 0.05)。UGFS组改良capriini风险评分高于RFA组和UGFS组,分别为8.7分和6.8分(p < 0.05)。治疗前腿部肿胀(0.92%)、可见静脉曲张(0.92%)、肥胖(0.49%)和静脉治疗前3个月内手术(0.41%)的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险增加。结论:改良的capriini评分是静脉血栓栓塞危险分层的有效工具,其发生率在RFA和UGFS患者中较低。静脉血栓栓塞史是RFA和UGFS患者复发的重要风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective chart review of venous thromboembolism incidence and management in rural patients undergoing varicose vein treatment.

Purpose: Determine the rate of incidence, risk factors, and management for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for varicose veins.

Methods: All charts of patients undergoing venous ablation from 2016 to 2023 were reviewed at a rural vein treatment clinic. The incidence of VTE was noted and a chart review was completed to identify risk factors for VTE, EHIT score, EFIT score, and management.

Results: Patients underwent 14,172 UGFS procedures and 4865 RFAs. VTE was noted in 45 patients (0.24%), with no pulmonary embolisms and no fatal outcomes among the patient population. Patients diagnosed with VTE had a median CEAP score of 3 and a modified Caprini risk score of 7.2. Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with prior history of DVT, patients undergoing UGFS, patients with higher Caprini scores. 90% of patients diagnosed with VTE had a prior history of DVT (p < 0.05). Patients who received UGFS treatments had a higher modified Caprini Risk Score than patients who received an RFA and UGFS, 8.7 and 6.8 respectively (p < 0.05). Increased risk of VTE was noted in patients with swollen legs prior to treatment (0.92%), visible varicose veins (0.92%), obesity (0.49%), and surgery within the prior 3 months to vein treatment (0.41%).

Conclusion: The modified Caprini score is a useful tool for risk stratification for VTE and its incidence is low for patients undergoing RFA and UGFS. Prior history of VTE represents a significant risk for recurrence in patients undergoing RFA and UGFS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信