甲状腺癌患者的入路:肺叶切除术候选人的选择和管理。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Eyal Robenshtok, Gideon Bachar, Amit Ritter
{"title":"甲状腺癌患者的入路:肺叶切除术候选人的选择和管理。","authors":"Eyal Robenshtok, Gideon Bachar, Amit Ritter","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thyroid lobectomy has gained increasing popularity over the past decade as a treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer, largely due to a rise in the diagnosis of low-risk cancers and evidence showing no benefit from radioiodine in low-risk disease. Multiple studies have confirmed lobectomy as an effective and safe option. Its advantages over total thyroidectomy include lower complication rates and a reduced need for lifelong levothyroxine (LT4) therapy. Recent research has broadened the indications for lobectomy, extending its use to patients with contralateral benign nodules and several \"adverse\" histological features, such as minimal extrathyroidal extension, small lymph node metastases, or multifocality-provided these are of minimal size. For patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma, who typically undergo surgery for Bethesda III-IV cytology, minimally invasive disease should be treated with lobectomy alone. In patients with angioinvasion, the risk of metastasis increases with the number of vessels involved (>2-3 vessels), larger tumor size, and advanced patient age. Following surgery, current evidence supports a TSH target within the normal range, reducing the need for LT4 treatment to only 30% of patients. Follow-up is based on neck ultrasound because thyroglobulin levels have limited value in detecting recurrence. In cases where further treatment is required, completion thyroidectomy is as safe as upfront total thyroidectomy. Overall, lobectomy is the preferred treatment option for many, if not most, differentiated thyroid cancer patients with low to low-intermediate risk disease, offering lower complication rates, reduced need for LT4 therapy, and excellent long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e2327-e2337"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approach to the Patient With Thyroid Cancer: Selection and Management of Candidates for Lobectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Eyal Robenshtok, Gideon Bachar, Amit Ritter\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgae903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thyroid lobectomy has gained increasing popularity over the past decade as a treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer, largely due to a rise in the diagnosis of low-risk cancers and evidence showing no benefit from radioiodine in low-risk disease. Multiple studies have confirmed lobectomy as an effective and safe option. Its advantages over total thyroidectomy include lower complication rates and a reduced need for lifelong levothyroxine (LT4) therapy. Recent research has broadened the indications for lobectomy, extending its use to patients with contralateral benign nodules and several \\\"adverse\\\" histological features, such as minimal extrathyroidal extension, small lymph node metastases, or multifocality-provided these are of minimal size. For patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma, who typically undergo surgery for Bethesda III-IV cytology, minimally invasive disease should be treated with lobectomy alone. In patients with angioinvasion, the risk of metastasis increases with the number of vessels involved (>2-3 vessels), larger tumor size, and advanced patient age. Following surgery, current evidence supports a TSH target within the normal range, reducing the need for LT4 treatment to only 30% of patients. Follow-up is based on neck ultrasound because thyroglobulin levels have limited value in detecting recurrence. In cases where further treatment is required, completion thyroidectomy is as safe as upfront total thyroidectomy. Overall, lobectomy is the preferred treatment option for many, if not most, differentiated thyroid cancer patients with low to low-intermediate risk disease, offering lower complication rates, reduced need for LT4 therapy, and excellent long-term outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e2327-e2337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae903\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,甲状腺叶切除术作为分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)的一种治疗方法越来越受欢迎,主要原因是低风险癌症诊断的增加,以及有证据表明放射性碘对低风险疾病没有益处。多项研究证实,肺叶切除术是一种有效且安全的选择。与全甲状腺切除术相比,其优点包括并发症发生率较低,减少了终身左甲状腺素(LT4)治疗的需要。最近的研究扩大了肺叶切除术的适应症,将其应用范围扩大到对侧良性结节和一些“不良”组织学特征的患者,如最小的ETE、小淋巴结转移或多灶性,只要这些结节的体积很小。对于通常接受Bethesda III-IV细胞学手术的滤泡性甲状腺癌患者,微创疾病应单独行肺叶切除术。在血管浸润的患者中,转移的风险随着受损伤血管的数量(> -3血管)、肿瘤大小和患者年龄的增加而增加。手术后,目前的证据支持TSH目标在正常范围内,仅30%的患者需要LT4治疗。随访是基于颈部US,因为甲状腺球蛋白水平在检测复发方面价值有限。在需要进一步治疗的情况下,完全甲状腺切除术与预先全甲状腺切除术一样安全。总体而言,肺叶切除术是许多(如果不是大多数)低至中低风险DTC患者的首选治疗方案,并发症发生率较低,LT4治疗需求减少,长期预后良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approach to the Patient With Thyroid Cancer: Selection and Management of Candidates for Lobectomy.

Thyroid lobectomy has gained increasing popularity over the past decade as a treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer, largely due to a rise in the diagnosis of low-risk cancers and evidence showing no benefit from radioiodine in low-risk disease. Multiple studies have confirmed lobectomy as an effective and safe option. Its advantages over total thyroidectomy include lower complication rates and a reduced need for lifelong levothyroxine (LT4) therapy. Recent research has broadened the indications for lobectomy, extending its use to patients with contralateral benign nodules and several "adverse" histological features, such as minimal extrathyroidal extension, small lymph node metastases, or multifocality-provided these are of minimal size. For patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma, who typically undergo surgery for Bethesda III-IV cytology, minimally invasive disease should be treated with lobectomy alone. In patients with angioinvasion, the risk of metastasis increases with the number of vessels involved (>2-3 vessels), larger tumor size, and advanced patient age. Following surgery, current evidence supports a TSH target within the normal range, reducing the need for LT4 treatment to only 30% of patients. Follow-up is based on neck ultrasound because thyroglobulin levels have limited value in detecting recurrence. In cases where further treatment is required, completion thyroidectomy is as safe as upfront total thyroidectomy. Overall, lobectomy is the preferred treatment option for many, if not most, differentiated thyroid cancer patients with low to low-intermediate risk disease, offering lower complication rates, reduced need for LT4 therapy, and excellent long-term outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信