机器学习辅助构建COPD自我评价问卷(COPD- eq):中国一项全国性多中心研究

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yiming Ma, Zijie Zhan, Yahong Chen, Jing Zhang, Wen Li, Zhiyi He, Jungang Xie, Haijin Zhao, Anping Xu, Kun Peng, Gang Wang, Qingping Zeng, Ting Yang, Yan Chen, Chen Wang
{"title":"机器学习辅助构建COPD自我评价问卷(COPD- eq):中国一项全国性多中心研究","authors":"Yiming Ma, Zijie Zhan, Yahong Chen, Jing Zhang, Wen Li, Zhiyi He, Jungang Xie, Haijin Zhao, Anping Xu, Kun Peng, Gang Wang, Qingping Zeng, Ting Yang, Yan Chen, Chen Wang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 70% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed worldwide. We aimed to develop and validate a COPD self-evaluation questionnaire (COPD-EQ) that is better suited for COPD screening in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a primary version of COPD-EQ based on the Delphi method. Then, we conducted a nationwide multicentre prospective to validate our novel COPD-EQ screening ability. To improve the screening ability of COPD-EQ, we used a series of machine learning (ML)-based methods, including logistic regression, XgBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. These models were developed and then evaluated on a random 3:1 train/test split.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through the Delphi approach, we developed the primary version of COPD-EQ with nine items. In the following prospective multicentre study, we recruited 1824 outpatients from 12 sites, of whom 404 (22.1%) were diagnosed with COPD. After the score assignment assisted by ML models and the Shapley Additive Explanation method, six of nine items were retained for a briefer version of COPD-EQ. The scoring-based method achieves an AUC score of 0.734 at a threshold of 4.0. Finally, a novel six-item COPD-EQ questionnaire was developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COPD-EQ questionnaire was validated to be reliable and accurate in COPD screening for the Chinese population. The ML model can further improve the questionnaire's screening ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04052"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-assisted construction of COPD self-evaluation questionnaire (COPD-EQ): a national multicentre study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yiming Ma, Zijie Zhan, Yahong Chen, Jing Zhang, Wen Li, Zhiyi He, Jungang Xie, Haijin Zhao, Anping Xu, Kun Peng, Gang Wang, Qingping Zeng, Ting Yang, Yan Chen, Chen Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 70% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed worldwide. We aimed to develop and validate a COPD self-evaluation questionnaire (COPD-EQ) that is better suited for COPD screening in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a primary version of COPD-EQ based on the Delphi method. Then, we conducted a nationwide multicentre prospective to validate our novel COPD-EQ screening ability. To improve the screening ability of COPD-EQ, we used a series of machine learning (ML)-based methods, including logistic regression, XgBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. These models were developed and then evaluated on a random 3:1 train/test split.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through the Delphi approach, we developed the primary version of COPD-EQ with nine items. In the following prospective multicentre study, we recruited 1824 outpatients from 12 sites, of whom 404 (22.1%) were diagnosed with COPD. After the score assignment assisted by ML models and the Shapley Additive Explanation method, six of nine items were retained for a briefer version of COPD-EQ. The scoring-based method achieves an AUC score of 0.734 at a threshold of 4.0. Finally, a novel six-item COPD-EQ questionnaire was developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COPD-EQ questionnaire was validated to be reliable and accurate in COPD screening for the Chinese population. The ML model can further improve the questionnaire's screening ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699521/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04052\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全世界约70%的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)未被诊断。我们旨在开发和验证一份更适合中国COPD筛查的COPD自我评估问卷(COPD- eq)。方法:我们基于德尔菲法开发了初级版的COPD-EQ。然后,我们进行了一项全国性的多中心前瞻性研究,以验证我们的新型COPD-EQ筛查能力。为了提高COPD-EQ的筛查能力,我们使用了一系列基于机器学习(ML)的方法,包括logistic回归、XgBoost、LightGBM和CatBoost。这些模型被开发出来,然后在随机的3:1训练/测试分割上进行评估。结果:通过德尔菲法,我们开发了包含9个项目的初级版COPD-EQ。在接下来的前瞻性多中心研究中,我们从12个地点招募了1824名门诊患者,其中404名(22.1%)被诊断为COPD。在ML模型和Shapley加性解释法辅助评分后,9个题项中的6个被保留,形成了一个更简短的COPD-EQ版本。基于评分的方法在阈值为4.0时获得了0.734的AUC分数。最后,编制了一份新的六项COPD-EQ问卷。结论:COPD- eq问卷在中国人群COPD筛查中是可靠和准确的。ML模型可以进一步提高问卷的筛选能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning-assisted construction of COPD self-evaluation questionnaire (COPD-EQ): a national multicentre study in China.

Background: Approximately 70% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is underdiagnosed worldwide. We aimed to develop and validate a COPD self-evaluation questionnaire (COPD-EQ) that is better suited for COPD screening in China.

Methods: We developed a primary version of COPD-EQ based on the Delphi method. Then, we conducted a nationwide multicentre prospective to validate our novel COPD-EQ screening ability. To improve the screening ability of COPD-EQ, we used a series of machine learning (ML)-based methods, including logistic regression, XgBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost. These models were developed and then evaluated on a random 3:1 train/test split.

Results: Through the Delphi approach, we developed the primary version of COPD-EQ with nine items. In the following prospective multicentre study, we recruited 1824 outpatients from 12 sites, of whom 404 (22.1%) were diagnosed with COPD. After the score assignment assisted by ML models and the Shapley Additive Explanation method, six of nine items were retained for a briefer version of COPD-EQ. The scoring-based method achieves an AUC score of 0.734 at a threshold of 4.0. Finally, a novel six-item COPD-EQ questionnaire was developed.

Conclusions: The COPD-EQ questionnaire was validated to be reliable and accurate in COPD screening for the Chinese population. The ML model can further improve the questionnaire's screening ability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信