[奥斯陆的门户开放政策:起点和终点]。

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-01-01
K H Westen, E de Bruijn, E Velthorst, H Kroon, Ph Delespaul
{"title":"[奥斯陆的门户开放政策:起点和终点]。","authors":"K H Westen, E de Bruijn, E Velthorst, H Kroon, Ph Delespaul","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Lovisenberg Diakonal Hospital recently introduced an Open-Door Policy in their (formerly) closed psychiatric admission wards for people with a forced admission to an acute psychiatric crisis. Their modern mental health care system is remarkably similar to the Dutch healthcare organization, with shared values and standards, and provides good grounds for an implementation of an Open-Doors Policy in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Gaining inspiration to reduce seclusion and create a new quality development and assessment process for closed admission departments in the Dutch mental health care system.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A delegation of mental health professionals paid a working visit to the Lovisenberg Diakonal Hospital in Oslo to observe and reflect on the Open-Door Policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The basis of the working method in Oslo is the pragmatic introduction of the Open-Door Policy with an implementation strategy based on the dialogue and an actual implementation combined with evaluations and creativity. The preliminary results are positive and do not seem to lead to more incidents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of an Open-Door Policy is a clear decision based on universal human rights and requires ample room for exploration and creativity during its implementation. Those involved commit to data-driven innovation and to distinguish recovery and team outcomes. This method stimulates a process of developmental learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"66 9","pages":"522-526"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Open-Doors Policy in Oslo: both the starting point and the final chord].\",\"authors\":\"K H Westen, E de Bruijn, E Velthorst, H Kroon, Ph Delespaul\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Lovisenberg Diakonal Hospital recently introduced an Open-Door Policy in their (formerly) closed psychiatric admission wards for people with a forced admission to an acute psychiatric crisis. Their modern mental health care system is remarkably similar to the Dutch healthcare organization, with shared values and standards, and provides good grounds for an implementation of an Open-Doors Policy in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Gaining inspiration to reduce seclusion and create a new quality development and assessment process for closed admission departments in the Dutch mental health care system.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A delegation of mental health professionals paid a working visit to the Lovisenberg Diakonal Hospital in Oslo to observe and reflect on the Open-Door Policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The basis of the working method in Oslo is the pragmatic introduction of the Open-Door Policy with an implementation strategy based on the dialogue and an actual implementation combined with evaluations and creativity. The preliminary results are positive and do not seem to lead to more incidents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of an Open-Door Policy is a clear decision based on universal human rights and requires ample room for exploration and creativity during its implementation. Those involved commit to data-driven innovation and to distinguish recovery and team outcomes. This method stimulates a process of developmental learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\"66 9\",\"pages\":\"522-526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Lovisenberg Diakonal医院最近在其(以前)封闭的精神病住院病房中引入了一项开放政策,用于强制入院的急性精神危机患者。他们的现代精神卫生保健系统与荷兰的医疗保健组织非常相似,具有共同的价值观和标准,为荷兰实施门户开放政策提供了良好的基础。目的:为荷兰精神卫生保健系统中封闭的住院部门获得减少隔离和创造新的质量发展和评估过程的灵感。方法:心理卫生专业人员代表团对奥斯陆Lovisenberg Diakonal医院进行工作访问,观察和反思门户开放政策。结果:奥斯陆工作方法的基础是务实地引进门户开放政策,并制定以对话为基础的执行战略和结合评价和创造性的实际执行。初步结果是积极的,似乎不会导致更多的事件。结论:实行门户开放政策是基于普遍人权的明确决定,在实施过程中需要有充分的探索和创造空间。相关人员致力于数据驱动的创新,并区分恢复和团队成果。这种方法刺激了发展性学习的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Open-Doors Policy in Oslo: both the starting point and the final chord].

Background: The Lovisenberg Diakonal Hospital recently introduced an Open-Door Policy in their (formerly) closed psychiatric admission wards for people with a forced admission to an acute psychiatric crisis. Their modern mental health care system is remarkably similar to the Dutch healthcare organization, with shared values and standards, and provides good grounds for an implementation of an Open-Doors Policy in the Netherlands.

Aim: Gaining inspiration to reduce seclusion and create a new quality development and assessment process for closed admission departments in the Dutch mental health care system.

Method: A delegation of mental health professionals paid a working visit to the Lovisenberg Diakonal Hospital in Oslo to observe and reflect on the Open-Door Policy.

Results: The basis of the working method in Oslo is the pragmatic introduction of the Open-Door Policy with an implementation strategy based on the dialogue and an actual implementation combined with evaluations and creativity. The preliminary results are positive and do not seem to lead to more incidents.

Conclusion: The introduction of an Open-Door Policy is a clear decision based on universal human rights and requires ample room for exploration and creativity during its implementation. Those involved commit to data-driven innovation and to distinguish recovery and team outcomes. This method stimulates a process of developmental learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信