Vahid Nejati, Jamal Amani Rad, Amir Hosein Hadian Rasanan
{"title":"广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)患者决策过程中风险和奖励加工的神经调节。","authors":"Vahid Nejati, Jamal Amani Rad, Amir Hosein Hadian Rasanan","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-84520-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD) have an impaired future-oriented processing and altered reward perception, which might involve the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Twenty-nine adults with GAD performed the balloon analogue risk-taking task (BART) and delay discounting task (DDT) during five sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different stimulation conditions. The stimulation conditions were: anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder, and sham stimulation. Cognitive modeling was used to extract process-based measures. The process-based modeling measures, rather than conventional outcome-based measures, showed a significant effect of stimulation condition. All real stimulation conditions improved the updating rate of prevalence, and risk taking in the BART. Moreover, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), and anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder stimulations we have observed an improvement in prior beliefs about the explosion. Also, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder we have observed more stable choice pattern. the DDT, exponential discounting rate and randomness were improved during anodal dlPFC and anodal vmPFC stimulation with extracranial return electrodes. Different roles of the targeted areas are discussed based on significant performance differences resulting from the specific electrode positions. The results suggest that different domains of reward processing are controlled by the vmPFC and dlPFC. The vmPFC is more relevant for value-based decision making with a positive expectation and chance-based randomness, whereas the dlPFC is more relevant for logic-based decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuromodulation of risk and reward processing during decision making in individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD).\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Nejati, Jamal Amani Rad, Amir Hosein Hadian Rasanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-024-84520-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD) have an impaired future-oriented processing and altered reward perception, which might involve the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Twenty-nine adults with GAD performed the balloon analogue risk-taking task (BART) and delay discounting task (DDT) during five sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different stimulation conditions. The stimulation conditions were: anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder, and sham stimulation. Cognitive modeling was used to extract process-based measures. The process-based modeling measures, rather than conventional outcome-based measures, showed a significant effect of stimulation condition. All real stimulation conditions improved the updating rate of prevalence, and risk taking in the BART. Moreover, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), and anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder stimulations we have observed an improvement in prior beliefs about the explosion. Also, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder we have observed more stable choice pattern. the DDT, exponential discounting rate and randomness were improved during anodal dlPFC and anodal vmPFC stimulation with extracranial return electrodes. Different roles of the targeted areas are discussed based on significant performance differences resulting from the specific electrode positions. The results suggest that different domains of reward processing are controlled by the vmPFC and dlPFC. The vmPFC is more relevant for value-based decision making with a positive expectation and chance-based randomness, whereas the dlPFC is more relevant for logic-based decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11696206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84520-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84520-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neuromodulation of risk and reward processing during decision making in individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD).
Individuals with general anxiety disorder (GAD) have an impaired future-oriented processing and altered reward perception, which might involve the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Twenty-nine adults with GAD performed the balloon analogue risk-taking task (BART) and delay discounting task (DDT) during five sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with different stimulation conditions. The stimulation conditions were: anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder, and sham stimulation. Cognitive modeling was used to extract process-based measures. The process-based modeling measures, rather than conventional outcome-based measures, showed a significant effect of stimulation condition. All real stimulation conditions improved the updating rate of prevalence, and risk taking in the BART. Moreover, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), and anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder stimulations we have observed an improvement in prior beliefs about the explosion. Also, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder we have observed more stable choice pattern. the DDT, exponential discounting rate and randomness were improved during anodal dlPFC and anodal vmPFC stimulation with extracranial return electrodes. Different roles of the targeted areas are discussed based on significant performance differences resulting from the specific electrode positions. The results suggest that different domains of reward processing are controlled by the vmPFC and dlPFC. The vmPFC is more relevant for value-based decision making with a positive expectation and chance-based randomness, whereas the dlPFC is more relevant for logic-based decision making.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.