Lisa Corvin, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Christof Dörfer, Guido Heine
{"title":"牙科过敏及其潜在的辅助因素:一项病例对照研究。","authors":"Lisa Corvin, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Christof Dörfer, Guido Heine","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b5907068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Allergic reactions during dental procedures are suspected frequently. Still, data on the confirmed allergens are rare. This study aimed to identify allergens in dentistry and potential cofactors in sensitization.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients with suspected allergic reactions in the context of dental (study group) or surgical (control group) procedures were analyzed in a monocentric 3-year retrospective and 2-year prospective file chart analysis between 2018 and 2023. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 129 patients were allocated to the study group and 123 to the control group. Confirmed allergy was less frequent in the study group (10%) than in the control group (28%, P .001). Local anesthetics triggered most dental reactions, but were rarely confirmed allergic (1 of 55 cases). Dental materials and implant material in the control group were confirmed in 16% and 15% of clinically relevant sensitizations, respectively. Multiple logistic regression identified reactions to local anesthetics or dental materials/implant material with a 33.33- or 2.63-fold lower risk of sensitization. A concomitant immune disease was associated with higher risk for a confirmed allergic reaction in dentistry in the cohort (OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.40 to 35.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Allergy to dentally administered drugs is rare. Most local anesthetic-triggered reactions were unspecific. Reactions to dental materials resulting in objective symptoms require allergy diagnostics. (Quintessence Int 2025;56:162-170; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5907068).</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allergies in dentistry and potential cofactors: a case-control study.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Corvin, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Christof Dörfer, Guido Heine\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b5907068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Allergic reactions during dental procedures are suspected frequently. Still, data on the confirmed allergens are rare. This study aimed to identify allergens in dentistry and potential cofactors in sensitization.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients with suspected allergic reactions in the context of dental (study group) or surgical (control group) procedures were analyzed in a monocentric 3-year retrospective and 2-year prospective file chart analysis between 2018 and 2023. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 129 patients were allocated to the study group and 123 to the control group. Confirmed allergy was less frequent in the study group (10%) than in the control group (28%, P .001). Local anesthetics triggered most dental reactions, but were rarely confirmed allergic (1 of 55 cases). Dental materials and implant material in the control group were confirmed in 16% and 15% of clinically relevant sensitizations, respectively. Multiple logistic regression identified reactions to local anesthetics or dental materials/implant material with a 33.33- or 2.63-fold lower risk of sensitization. A concomitant immune disease was associated with higher risk for a confirmed allergic reaction in dentistry in the cohort (OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.40 to 35.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Allergy to dentally administered drugs is rare. Most local anesthetic-triggered reactions were unspecific. Reactions to dental materials resulting in objective symptoms require allergy diagnostics. (Quintessence Int 2025;56:162-170; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5907068).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"162-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5907068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b5907068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在牙科手术过程中经常怀疑过敏反应。不过,有关已证实的过敏原的数据很少。本研究旨在确定牙科过敏原和致敏的潜在辅助因素。方法和材料:对2018年至2023年期间牙科(研究组)或外科(对照组)手术中疑似过敏反应的患者进行单中心3年回顾性和2年前瞻性文件图表分析。进行描述性统计和多元逻辑回归分析。结果:实验组129例,对照组123例。研究组确诊过敏发生率(10%)低于对照组(28%,P < 0.001)。局部麻醉剂(LA)引起大多数牙齿反应,但很少证实过敏(55例中有1例)。对照组牙体材料(DM)和种植体材料(IM)的临床相关敏化率分别为16%和15%。多元逻辑回归发现,LA或DM/IM的过敏反应风险分别降低33.33或2.63倍。在我们的队列中,伴随性免疫疾病与牙科确诊过敏反应的高风险相关(OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.4-35.1)。结论:口腔给药过敏是罕见的。洛杉矶引发的大多数反应都不具体。对牙科材料的反应导致客观症状需要过敏诊断。
Allergies in dentistry and potential cofactors: a case-control study.
Objective: Allergic reactions during dental procedures are suspected frequently. Still, data on the confirmed allergens are rare. This study aimed to identify allergens in dentistry and potential cofactors in sensitization.
Method and materials: Patients with suspected allergic reactions in the context of dental (study group) or surgical (control group) procedures were analyzed in a monocentric 3-year retrospective and 2-year prospective file chart analysis between 2018 and 2023. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed.
Results: In total, 129 patients were allocated to the study group and 123 to the control group. Confirmed allergy was less frequent in the study group (10%) than in the control group (28%, P .001). Local anesthetics triggered most dental reactions, but were rarely confirmed allergic (1 of 55 cases). Dental materials and implant material in the control group were confirmed in 16% and 15% of clinically relevant sensitizations, respectively. Multiple logistic regression identified reactions to local anesthetics or dental materials/implant material with a 33.33- or 2.63-fold lower risk of sensitization. A concomitant immune disease was associated with higher risk for a confirmed allergic reaction in dentistry in the cohort (OR 9.12, 95% CI 2.40 to 35.10).
Conclusion: Allergy to dentally administered drugs is rare. Most local anesthetic-triggered reactions were unspecific. Reactions to dental materials resulting in objective symptoms require allergy diagnostics. (Quintessence Int 2025;56:162-170; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5907068).
期刊介绍:
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.