人格障碍中的精神化与过度化:非适应人格的主成分分析与社会认知电影评估。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychopathology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1159/000543363
Julia Jurist, Jenna M Traynor, Grace E Murray, Boyu Ren, Sara R Masland, Sam Mermin, Kevin B Meehan, Lois W Choi-Kain
{"title":"人格障碍中的精神化与过度化:非适应人格的主成分分析与社会认知电影评估。","authors":"Julia Jurist, Jenna M Traynor, Grace E Murray, Boyu Ren, Sara R Masland, Sam Mermin, Kevin B Meehan, Lois W Choi-Kain","doi":"10.1159/000543363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction This secondary analysis of quality control data assessed principal components of personality dysfunction and their relationship to mentalizing in a sample of treatment-seeking women with severe personality disorders. Methods The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) and the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) were administered to 37 females in routine quality assessments of a specialized residential treatment program. Principal component analysis (PCA) of SNAP scores was used to determine dimensions of personality most significantly contributing to overall maladaptive personality functioning. Bootstrapped stepwise regression tested the relationship of dimensional personality indices to hypermentalizing and hypomentalizing on the MASC controlling for general psychiatric severity. Results Four principal components (PCs) explained 71.4% of the variance in personality dysfunction, mapping onto antisocial, obsessive-compulsive, borderline, and narcissistic personality constellations. The borderline and antisocial PCs were positively predictive of hypermentalizing. The obsessive-compulsive PC was positively predictive of hypomentalizing, while the antisocial PC was negatively predictive of hypomentalizing. Conclusion The study reiterates prior findings of a relationship between hypermentalizing and borderline and antisocial personality profiles. It also contributes evidence to the limited research on hypomentalizing as a clinical indicator and potential treatment target for obsessive-compulsive personality, and provides evidence of a negative relationship between antisocial personality disorder and hypomentalizing. These findings provide clinical indications for enhancing and regulating mentalizing via attention to and interpretations of internal and interpersonal events in individuals with personality disorders. Further research is needed to replicate these associations in larger, more representative clinical samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Under and Overmentalizing in Personality Disorders: A principle component analysis of nonadaptive personality and the Movie Assessment of Social Cognition.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Jurist, Jenna M Traynor, Grace E Murray, Boyu Ren, Sara R Masland, Sam Mermin, Kevin B Meehan, Lois W Choi-Kain\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000543363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction This secondary analysis of quality control data assessed principal components of personality dysfunction and their relationship to mentalizing in a sample of treatment-seeking women with severe personality disorders. Methods The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) and the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) were administered to 37 females in routine quality assessments of a specialized residential treatment program. Principal component analysis (PCA) of SNAP scores was used to determine dimensions of personality most significantly contributing to overall maladaptive personality functioning. Bootstrapped stepwise regression tested the relationship of dimensional personality indices to hypermentalizing and hypomentalizing on the MASC controlling for general psychiatric severity. Results Four principal components (PCs) explained 71.4% of the variance in personality dysfunction, mapping onto antisocial, obsessive-compulsive, borderline, and narcissistic personality constellations. The borderline and antisocial PCs were positively predictive of hypermentalizing. The obsessive-compulsive PC was positively predictive of hypomentalizing, while the antisocial PC was negatively predictive of hypomentalizing. Conclusion The study reiterates prior findings of a relationship between hypermentalizing and borderline and antisocial personality profiles. It also contributes evidence to the limited research on hypomentalizing as a clinical indicator and potential treatment target for obsessive-compulsive personality, and provides evidence of a negative relationship between antisocial personality disorder and hypomentalizing. These findings provide clinical indications for enhancing and regulating mentalizing via attention to and interpretations of internal and interpersonal events in individuals with personality disorders. Further research is needed to replicate these associations in larger, more representative clinical samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543363\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对质量控制数据进行了二次分析,评估了患有严重人格障碍的寻求治疗的女性样本中人格功能障碍的主要成分及其与精神化的关系。方法采用非适应人格量表和适应人格量表(SNAP)和社会认知评估量表(MASC)对37名女性进行常规质量评估。采用SNAP评分的主成分分析(PCA)确定对整体适应不良人格功能影响最大的人格维度。自举逐步回归检验了维度人格指数在一般精神严重程度的MASC控制下与超精神化和低精神化的关系。结果四主成分(PCs)解释了71.4%的人格功能障碍变异,映射到反社会、强迫、边缘型和自恋型人格星座。边缘型和反社会型个人电脑正预示着过度精神化。强迫性PC对低健忘有正向预测作用,而反社会PC对低健忘有负向预测作用。结论:该研究重申了先前关于过度精神化与边缘和反社会人格特征之间关系的发现。这也为将低健忘作为强迫症的临床指标和潜在治疗靶点的研究提供了证据,并为反社会人格障碍与低健忘之间的负相关提供了证据。这些发现为通过对人格障碍个体内部和人际事件的关注和解释来加强和调节心理化提供了临床指征。需要进一步的研究来在更大、更有代表性的临床样本中复制这些关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Under and Overmentalizing in Personality Disorders: A principle component analysis of nonadaptive personality and the Movie Assessment of Social Cognition.

Introduction This secondary analysis of quality control data assessed principal components of personality dysfunction and their relationship to mentalizing in a sample of treatment-seeking women with severe personality disorders. Methods The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP) and the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC) were administered to 37 females in routine quality assessments of a specialized residential treatment program. Principal component analysis (PCA) of SNAP scores was used to determine dimensions of personality most significantly contributing to overall maladaptive personality functioning. Bootstrapped stepwise regression tested the relationship of dimensional personality indices to hypermentalizing and hypomentalizing on the MASC controlling for general psychiatric severity. Results Four principal components (PCs) explained 71.4% of the variance in personality dysfunction, mapping onto antisocial, obsessive-compulsive, borderline, and narcissistic personality constellations. The borderline and antisocial PCs were positively predictive of hypermentalizing. The obsessive-compulsive PC was positively predictive of hypomentalizing, while the antisocial PC was negatively predictive of hypomentalizing. Conclusion The study reiterates prior findings of a relationship between hypermentalizing and borderline and antisocial personality profiles. It also contributes evidence to the limited research on hypomentalizing as a clinical indicator and potential treatment target for obsessive-compulsive personality, and provides evidence of a negative relationship between antisocial personality disorder and hypomentalizing. These findings provide clinical indications for enhancing and regulating mentalizing via attention to and interpretations of internal and interpersonal events in individuals with personality disorders. Further research is needed to replicate these associations in larger, more representative clinical samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopathology
Psychopathology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信