两种干扰素释放法检测儿童结核感染的比较。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
James T Gaensbauer, Randall R Reves, Dolly Katz, Amina Ahmed, Thara Venkatappa
{"title":"两种干扰素释放法检测儿童结核感染的比较。","authors":"James T Gaensbauer, Randall R Reves, Dolly Katz, Amina Ahmed, Thara Venkatappa","doi":"10.1093/jpids/piae135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying tuberculosis infection (TBI) using interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) is a primary component of clinical and public health efforts to prevent pediatric tuberculosis (TB). Pediatric data comparing the 2 IGRAs in the United States are very limited. We compared the performance of the 2 IGRAs among a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI and assessed whether discordance might be due to quantitative results close to test cutoff values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 0-15 years with both T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests were identified from a US multicenter study enrolling people at elevated risk of TBI or progression to TB disease. Results were compared using McNemar's Chi-square tests with stratification by age category and testing reason. Percent agreement and kappa statistics were also calculated. We characterized quantitative test results among children with discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3793 children, a higher number had positive QFT-GIT than T-SPOT (10.1% vs 7.4%, P < .001). This difference was noted for all age categories except <2 years, and for children with close-contact and non-close contact test indications. Among discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative children, lowering the positive threshold for T-SPOT to include borderline spot counts (5-7) did not eliminate the discordance, nor were QFT-GIT antigen-minus-nil results concentrated in the range just above the standard cutoff of 0.35 IU/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI, QFT-GIT had a higher proportion of positive results than T-SPOT, and discordance was not related to quantitative results close to the established diagnostic cutoffs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Pediatric Tuberculosis Infection.\",\"authors\":\"James T Gaensbauer, Randall R Reves, Dolly Katz, Amina Ahmed, Thara Venkatappa\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jpids/piae135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying tuberculosis infection (TBI) using interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) is a primary component of clinical and public health efforts to prevent pediatric tuberculosis (TB). Pediatric data comparing the 2 IGRAs in the United States are very limited. We compared the performance of the 2 IGRAs among a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI and assessed whether discordance might be due to quantitative results close to test cutoff values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 0-15 years with both T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests were identified from a US multicenter study enrolling people at elevated risk of TBI or progression to TB disease. Results were compared using McNemar's Chi-square tests with stratification by age category and testing reason. Percent agreement and kappa statistics were also calculated. We characterized quantitative test results among children with discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3793 children, a higher number had positive QFT-GIT than T-SPOT (10.1% vs 7.4%, P < .001). This difference was noted for all age categories except <2 years, and for children with close-contact and non-close contact test indications. Among discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative children, lowering the positive threshold for T-SPOT to include borderline spot counts (5-7) did not eliminate the discordance, nor were QFT-GIT antigen-minus-nil results concentrated in the range just above the standard cutoff of 0.35 IU/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI, QFT-GIT had a higher proportion of positive results than T-SPOT, and discordance was not related to quantitative results close to the established diagnostic cutoffs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piae135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piae135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:使用干扰素-γ 释放测定(IGRA)识别结核感染(TBI)是临床和公共卫生预防小儿结核病工作的主要组成部分。在美国,比较两种 IGRA 的儿科数据非常有限。我们在一大批接受过肺结核检测的儿童中比较了两种 IGRA 的性能,并评估了不一致是否可能是由于定量结果接近检测临界值造成的:从一项美国多中心研究中确定了同时接受 T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) 和 QuantiFERON TB-Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) 检测的 0-15 岁儿童,该研究招募了 TBI 或 TB 疾病进展风险较高的人群。使用 McNemar's Chi-square 检验对结果进行比较,并按年龄类别和检测原因进行分层。同时还计算了一致性百分比和卡帕统计量。我们对 QFT-GIT 阳性/T-SPOT 阴性结果不一致的儿童的定量检测结果进行了描述:在 3,793 名儿童中,QFT-GIT 阳性的人数高于 T-SPOT 阳性的人数(10.1% 对 7.4%,P < .001)。除结论外,所有年龄段的儿童都存在这种差异:在一大批接受 TBI 检测的儿童中,QFT-GIT 阳性结果的比例高于 T-SPOT,而不一致与接近既定诊断临界值的定量结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Two Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Pediatric Tuberculosis Infection.

Introduction: Identifying tuberculosis infection (TBI) using interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) is a primary component of clinical and public health efforts to prevent pediatric tuberculosis (TB). Pediatric data comparing the 2 IGRAs in the United States are very limited. We compared the performance of the 2 IGRAs among a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI and assessed whether discordance might be due to quantitative results close to test cutoff values.

Methods: Children aged 0-15 years with both T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) tests were identified from a US multicenter study enrolling people at elevated risk of TBI or progression to TB disease. Results were compared using McNemar's Chi-square tests with stratification by age category and testing reason. Percent agreement and kappa statistics were also calculated. We characterized quantitative test results among children with discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative results.

Results: Among 3793 children, a higher number had positive QFT-GIT than T-SPOT (10.1% vs 7.4%, P < .001). This difference was noted for all age categories except <2 years, and for children with close-contact and non-close contact test indications. Among discordant QFT-GIT-positive/T-SPOT-negative children, lowering the positive threshold for T-SPOT to include borderline spot counts (5-7) did not eliminate the discordance, nor were QFT-GIT antigen-minus-nil results concentrated in the range just above the standard cutoff of 0.35 IU/mL.

Conclusions: In a large pediatric cohort tested for TBI, QFT-GIT had a higher proportion of positive results than T-SPOT, and discordance was not related to quantitative results close to the established diagnostic cutoffs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
179
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (JPIDS), the official journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, is dedicated to perinatal, childhood, and adolescent infectious diseases. The journal is a high-quality source of original research articles, clinical trial reports, guidelines, and topical reviews, with particular attention to the interests and needs of the global pediatric infectious diseases communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信