{"title":"神经外科手术室麻醉信息管理系统审计的启示。","authors":"Rohit Malhotra, Kamath Sriganesh, Sudhir Venkataramaiah, Dhritiman Chakrabarti","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An anesthesia information management system (AIMS) can be used to assess operating room utilization. The aim of this study was to assess neurosurgery OR utilization patterns using an AIMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit was performed at a tertiary neurosciences university hospital over a 1-year period. The time taken for various OR activities were identified from the timestamps recorded in the AIMS and used to assess whether the type of surgical procedure, patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, case schedule order, or surgeons' experience impacted operating room utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1800 patients were available for analysis. Utilization times for various operating room activities were different based on the type of surgery, ASA grade, case order, and surgeon seniority. The main differences were found in the durations of surgery and anesthesia, and the time from the arrival of a patient into the operating room and the start of surgery, which were significantly impacted by the type of surgery, case order, and surgeon seniority (P<0.001), but not by ASA score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AIMS can effectively track and identify operating room utilization patterns by analyzing the durations of various operating room activities. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings in different surgical populations and centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learnings From an Audit of Anesthesia Information Management System for Neurosurgery Operating Room Utilization.\",\"authors\":\"Rohit Malhotra, Kamath Sriganesh, Sudhir Venkataramaiah, Dhritiman Chakrabarti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An anesthesia information management system (AIMS) can be used to assess operating room utilization. The aim of this study was to assess neurosurgery OR utilization patterns using an AIMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit was performed at a tertiary neurosciences university hospital over a 1-year period. The time taken for various OR activities were identified from the timestamps recorded in the AIMS and used to assess whether the type of surgical procedure, patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, case schedule order, or surgeons' experience impacted operating room utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1800 patients were available for analysis. Utilization times for various operating room activities were different based on the type of surgery, ASA grade, case order, and surgeon seniority. The main differences were found in the durations of surgery and anesthesia, and the time from the arrival of a patient into the operating room and the start of surgery, which were significantly impacted by the type of surgery, case order, and surgeon seniority (P<0.001), but not by ASA score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AIMS can effectively track and identify operating room utilization patterns by analyzing the durations of various operating room activities. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings in different surgical populations and centers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learnings From an Audit of Anesthesia Information Management System for Neurosurgery Operating Room Utilization.
Background: An anesthesia information management system (AIMS) can be used to assess operating room utilization. The aim of this study was to assess neurosurgery OR utilization patterns using an AIMS.
Methods: This retrospective audit was performed at a tertiary neurosciences university hospital over a 1-year period. The time taken for various OR activities were identified from the timestamps recorded in the AIMS and used to assess whether the type of surgical procedure, patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, case schedule order, or surgeons' experience impacted operating room utilization.
Results: Data from 1800 patients were available for analysis. Utilization times for various operating room activities were different based on the type of surgery, ASA grade, case order, and surgeon seniority. The main differences were found in the durations of surgery and anesthesia, and the time from the arrival of a patient into the operating room and the start of surgery, which were significantly impacted by the type of surgery, case order, and surgeon seniority (P<0.001), but not by ASA score.
Conclusions: AIMS can effectively track and identify operating room utilization patterns by analyzing the durations of various operating room activities. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings in different surgical populations and centers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies.
JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.