神经外科手术室麻醉信息管理系统审计的启示。

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Rohit Malhotra, Kamath Sriganesh, Sudhir Venkataramaiah, Dhritiman Chakrabarti
{"title":"神经外科手术室麻醉信息管理系统审计的启示。","authors":"Rohit Malhotra, Kamath Sriganesh, Sudhir Venkataramaiah, Dhritiman Chakrabarti","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An anesthesia information management system (AIMS) can be used to assess operating room utilization. The aim of this study was to assess neurosurgery OR utilization patterns using an AIMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit was performed at a tertiary neurosciences university hospital over a 1-year period. The time taken for various OR activities were identified from the timestamps recorded in the AIMS and used to assess whether the type of surgical procedure, patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, case schedule order, or surgeons' experience impacted operating room utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1800 patients were available for analysis. Utilization times for various operating room activities were different based on the type of surgery, ASA grade, case order, and surgeon seniority. The main differences were found in the durations of surgery and anesthesia, and the time from the arrival of a patient into the operating room and the start of surgery, which were significantly impacted by the type of surgery, case order, and surgeon seniority (P<0.001), but not by ASA score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AIMS can effectively track and identify operating room utilization patterns by analyzing the durations of various operating room activities. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings in different surgical populations and centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learnings From an Audit of Anesthesia Information Management System for Neurosurgery Operating Room Utilization.\",\"authors\":\"Rohit Malhotra, Kamath Sriganesh, Sudhir Venkataramaiah, Dhritiman Chakrabarti\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An anesthesia information management system (AIMS) can be used to assess operating room utilization. The aim of this study was to assess neurosurgery OR utilization patterns using an AIMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective audit was performed at a tertiary neurosciences university hospital over a 1-year period. The time taken for various OR activities were identified from the timestamps recorded in the AIMS and used to assess whether the type of surgical procedure, patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, case schedule order, or surgeons' experience impacted operating room utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1800 patients were available for analysis. Utilization times for various operating room activities were different based on the type of surgery, ASA grade, case order, and surgeon seniority. The main differences were found in the durations of surgery and anesthesia, and the time from the arrival of a patient into the operating room and the start of surgery, which were significantly impacted by the type of surgery, case order, and surgeon seniority (P<0.001), but not by ASA score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AIMS can effectively track and identify operating room utilization patterns by analyzing the durations of various operating room activities. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings in different surgical populations and centers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻醉信息管理系统(AIMS)可用于评估手术室的使用情况。本研究的目的是利用AIMS评估神经外科手术室的使用模式。方法:回顾性审计在一个三级神经科学大学医院进行了1年的时间。从AIMS记录的时间戳中确定各种手术室活动所需的时间,并用于评估手术类型、患者的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状态评分、病例时间表顺序或外科医生的经验是否影响手术室的利用率。结果:来自1800名患者的数据可供分析。各种手术室活动的使用时间根据手术类型、ASA等级、病例顺序和外科医生的资历而有所不同。主要差异在手术时间和麻醉时间,以及患者进入手术室到手术开始的时间,这些差异受到手术类型、病例顺序和外科医生资历的显著影响(p结论:AIMS通过分析各种手术室活动的持续时间,可以有效地跟踪和识别手术室的利用模式。需要前瞻性多中心研究在不同的手术人群和中心验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learnings From an Audit of Anesthesia Information Management System for Neurosurgery Operating Room Utilization.

Background: An anesthesia information management system (AIMS) can be used to assess operating room utilization. The aim of this study was to assess neurosurgery OR utilization patterns using an AIMS.

Methods: This retrospective audit was performed at a tertiary neurosciences university hospital over a 1-year period. The time taken for various OR activities were identified from the timestamps recorded in the AIMS and used to assess whether the type of surgical procedure, patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, case schedule order, or surgeons' experience impacted operating room utilization.

Results: Data from 1800 patients were available for analysis. Utilization times for various operating room activities were different based on the type of surgery, ASA grade, case order, and surgeon seniority. The main differences were found in the durations of surgery and anesthesia, and the time from the arrival of a patient into the operating room and the start of surgery, which were significantly impacted by the type of surgery, case order, and surgeon seniority (P<0.001), but not by ASA score.

Conclusions: AIMS can effectively track and identify operating room utilization patterns by analyzing the durations of various operating room activities. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate these findings in different surgical populations and centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信