神经肌肉电刺激和阻力训练对肌肉质量和力量的叠加效应。

IF 2.8 3区医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY

European Journal of Applied Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05700-2

Gabriel Narvaez, Jehu Apaflo, Amy Wagler, Andrew McAinch, Sudip Bajpeyi

{"title":"神经肌肉电刺激和阻力训练对肌肉质量和力量的叠加效应。","authors":"Gabriel Narvaez, Jehu Apaflo, Amy Wagler, Andrew McAinch, Sudip Bajpeyi","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05700-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To compare strength and muscle mass development between conventional resistance training (RT) and a combined resistance training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (RT + NMES).Methods: Searches of EBSCO, GoogleScholar, PubMed, and ResearchGate were conducted for studies that met the inclusion criteria of being a randomized controlled trial comparing RT in isolation with NMES and RT being done simultaneously. Effect sizes were calculated as the standard mean difference (SMD) and meta-analyses were computed using random effects models. Thirteen studies were included in the analyses.Results: When comparing strength gain, there was a favorable effect towards superimposed training (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 73.05%) with similar results seen for muscle mass (SMD: 0.26; 95% CI 0.04-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 21.45%).Conclusion: Use of NMES during RT results in greater gains in strength and muscle mass compared to RT performed in isolation. Incorporation of NMES into RT protocols may represent a more effective strategy to improve muscle strength and muscle mass. Future studies should explore whether use of NMES concurrently with RT may have additive effects on metabolic and/or cardiovascular health.","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The additive effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and resistance training on muscle mass and strength.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Narvaez, Jehu Apaflo, Amy Wagler, Andrew McAinch, Sudip Bajpeyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05700-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To compare strength and muscle mass development between conventional resistance training (RT) and a combined resistance training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (RT + NMES).Methods: Searches of EBSCO, GoogleScholar, PubMed, and ResearchGate were conducted for studies that met the inclusion criteria of being a randomized controlled trial comparing RT in isolation with NMES and RT being done simultaneously. Effect sizes were calculated as the standard mean difference (SMD) and meta-analyses were computed using random effects models. Thirteen studies were included in the analyses.Results: When comparing strength gain, there was a favorable effect towards superimposed training (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 73.05%) with similar results seen for muscle mass (SMD: 0.26; 95% CI 0.04-0.49; p = 0.02; I2 = 21.45%).Conclusion: Use of NMES during RT results in greater gains in strength and muscle mass compared to RT performed in isolation. Incorporation of NMES into RT protocols may represent a more effective strategy to improve muscle strength and muscle mass. Future studies should explore whether use of NMES concurrently with RT may have additive effects on metabolic and/or cardiovascular health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05700-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05700-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：比较常规抗阻训练（RT）与神经肌肉电刺激联合抗阻训练（RT + NMES）组的力量和肌肉量的发展。方法：检索EBSCO、GoogleScholar、PubMed和ResearchGate，寻找符合随机对照试验标准的研究，将单独RT与同时进行NMES和RT进行比较。效应量采用标准平均差（SMD）计算，meta分析采用随机效应模型计算。13项研究被纳入分析。结果：在对比力量增益时，叠加训练效果较好(SMD: 0.31；95% ci 0.13-0.49；p = 0.02；I2 = 73.05%)，肌肉质量也有类似的结果(SMD: 0.26；95% ci 0.04-0.49；p = 0.02；i2 = 21.45%)。结论：与单独进行的RT相比，在RT期间使用NMES可以获得更大的力量和肌肉质量。将NMES纳入RT方案可能是改善肌肉力量和肌肉质量的更有效策略。未来的研究应该探索NMES与RT同时使用是否会对代谢和/或心血管健康产生累加性影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The additive effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and resistance training on muscle mass and strength.

Purpose: To compare strength and muscle mass development between conventional resistance training (RT) and a combined resistance training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation group (RT + NMES).

Methods: Searches of EBSCO, GoogleScholar, PubMed, and ResearchGate were conducted for studies that met the inclusion criteria of being a randomized controlled trial comparing RT in isolation with NMES and RT being done simultaneously. Effect sizes were calculated as the standard mean difference (SMD) and meta-analyses were computed using random effects models. Thirteen studies were included in the analyses.

Results: When comparing strength gain, there was a favorable effect towards superimposed training (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI 0.13-0.49; p = 0.02; I² = 73.05%) with similar results seen for muscle mass (SMD: 0.26; 95% CI 0.04-0.49; p = 0.02; I² = 21.45%).

Conclusion: Use of NMES during RT results in greater gains in strength and muscle mass compared to RT performed in isolation. Incorporation of NMES into RT protocols may represent a more effective strategy to improve muscle strength and muscle mass. Future studies should explore whether use of NMES concurrently with RT may have additive effects on metabolic and/or cardiovascular health.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Applied Physiology 医学-生理学

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

6.70%

发文量

227

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.