使用“Express”模式对水中δ18O和δ2H进行高通量测量的腔衰荡光谱性能和方法

IF 2.2 3区 化学 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Nir Galili, Thomas M Blattmann, Anna Somlyay, Nora Gallarotti, Timothy I Eglinton, Jordon D Hemingway
{"title":"使用“Express”模式对水中δ18O和δ2H进行高通量测量的腔衰荡光谱性能和方法","authors":"Nir Galili, Thomas M Blattmann, Anna Somlyay, Nora Gallarotti, Timothy I Eglinton, Jordon D Hemingway","doi":"10.1177/00037028241302355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) is rapidly becoming an invaluable tool to measure hydrogen (δ²H) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) isotopic compositions in water, yet the long-term accuracy and precision of this technique remain relatively underreported. Here, we critically evaluate one-year performance of CRDS δ²H and δ<sup>18</sup>O measurements at ETH Zurich, focusing on high throughput (~200 samples per week) while maintaining required precision and accuracy for diverse scientific investigations. We detail a comprehensive methodological and calibration strategy to optimize CRDS reliability for continuous, high-throughput analysis using Picarro's \"Express\" mode, an area not extensively explored previously. Using this strategy, we demonstrate that CRDS achieves long-term precision better than ±0.5‰ for δ<sup>18</sup>O and ±1.0‰ for δ²H (±1σ) on three United States Geological Survey (USGS) reference materials treated as unknowns.<sup>18</sup> Specifically, reported results for each reference material over this one-year period are: (i) USGS W-67444: <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math>H = <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>399.32</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.96</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math>, <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>18</mn></msup></math>O = <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>51.07</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.45</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math> (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>30</mn></math>), (ii) USGS W-67400: <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math>H = <math><mrow><mn>2.55</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.49</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math>, <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>18</mn></msup></math>O = <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>1.85</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.13</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math> (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>140</mn></math>), and (iii) USGS-50: <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math>H = <math><mrow><mn>33.68</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.91</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math>, <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>18</mn></msup></math>O = <math><mrow><mn>5.03</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.04</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math> (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>21</mn></math>). We also address challenges such as aligning our analytical uncertainties with the narrower uncertainties of International Atomic Energy Agency reference materials, and mitigating inherent CRDS issues like memory and matrix effects when analyzing environmental samples. Our review provides a practical framework for CRDS applications in hydrology, paleoclimatology, and biogeochemistry, underscoring the importance of continuous evaluation and methodological refinement to ensure accuracy and precision in δ²H and δ<sup>18</sup>O analyses.<sup>18</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8253,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spectroscopy","volume":" ","pages":"37028241302355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<ArticleTitle xmlns:ns0=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\">Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy Performance and Procedures for High-Throughput <ns0:math><ns0:msup><ns0:mi>δ</ns0:mi><ns0:mn>18</ns0:mn></ns0:msup></ns0:math>O and <ns0:math><ns0:msup><ns0:mi>δ</ns0:mi><ns0:mn>2</ns0:mn></ns0:msup></ns0:math>H Measurement in Water Using \\\"Express\\\" Mode.\",\"authors\":\"Nir Galili, Thomas M Blattmann, Anna Somlyay, Nora Gallarotti, Timothy I Eglinton, Jordon D Hemingway\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00037028241302355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) is rapidly becoming an invaluable tool to measure hydrogen (δ²H) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) isotopic compositions in water, yet the long-term accuracy and precision of this technique remain relatively underreported. Here, we critically evaluate one-year performance of CRDS δ²H and δ<sup>18</sup>O measurements at ETH Zurich, focusing on high throughput (~200 samples per week) while maintaining required precision and accuracy for diverse scientific investigations. We detail a comprehensive methodological and calibration strategy to optimize CRDS reliability for continuous, high-throughput analysis using Picarro's \\\"Express\\\" mode, an area not extensively explored previously. Using this strategy, we demonstrate that CRDS achieves long-term precision better than ±0.5‰ for δ<sup>18</sup>O and ±1.0‰ for δ²H (±1σ) on three United States Geological Survey (USGS) reference materials treated as unknowns.<sup>18</sup> Specifically, reported results for each reference material over this one-year period are: (i) USGS W-67444: <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math>H = <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>399.32</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.96</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math>, <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>18</mn></msup></math>O = <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>51.07</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.45</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math> (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>30</mn></math>), (ii) USGS W-67400: <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math>H = <math><mrow><mn>2.55</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.49</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math>, <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>18</mn></msup></math>O = <math><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>1.85</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.13</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math> (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>140</mn></math>), and (iii) USGS-50: <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup></math>H = <math><mrow><mn>33.68</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.91</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math>, <math><msup><mi>δ</mi><mn>18</mn></msup></math>O = <math><mrow><mn>5.03</mn><mo>±</mo><mn>0.04</mn></mrow><mtext>‰</mtext></math> (<math><mi>n</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>21</mn></math>). We also address challenges such as aligning our analytical uncertainties with the narrower uncertainties of International Atomic Energy Agency reference materials, and mitigating inherent CRDS issues like memory and matrix effects when analyzing environmental samples. Our review provides a practical framework for CRDS applications in hydrology, paleoclimatology, and biogeochemistry, underscoring the importance of continuous evaluation and methodological refinement to ensure accuracy and precision in δ²H and δ<sup>18</sup>O analyses.<sup>18</sup>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Spectroscopy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37028241302355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Spectroscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028241302355\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028241302355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空腔衰荡光谱(CRDS)正迅速成为测量水中氢(δ²H)和氧(δ 18o)同位素组成的宝贵工具,但该技术的长期准确性和精度仍然相对较少。在这里,我们批判性地评估了苏黎世联邦理工学院CRDS δ²H和δ 18o测量的一年性能,重点是高通量(每周约200个样品),同时保持各种科学研究所需的精度和准确性。我们详细介绍了一种全面的方法和校准策略,以优化CRDS的可靠性,使用Picarro的“快速”模式进行连续、高通量分析,这是一个以前没有广泛探索的领域。使用该策略,我们证明了CRDS在三种美国地质调查局(USGS)基准物质上的长期精度优于δ 18o的±0.5‰和δ²H(±1σ)的±1.0‰其中,1年来各参考物质的报告结果为:(1)USGS W-67444: δ2H = -399.32±0.96‰,δ18O = -51.07±0.45‰(n=30); (2) USGS W-67400: δ2H = 2.55±0.49‰,δ18O = -1.85±0.13‰(n=140); (3) USGS-50: δ2H = 33.68±0.91‰,δ18O = 5.03±0.04‰(n=21)。我们还解决了一些挑战,如将我们的分析不确定性与国际原子能机构参考材料的较小不确定性相一致,以及在分析环境样品时减轻固有的CRDS问题,如记忆和矩阵效应。我们的综述为CRDS在水文、古气候学和生物地球化学中的应用提供了一个实用的框架,强调了持续评估和方法改进的重要性,以确保δ²H和δ 18o分析的准确性和精密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy Performance and Procedures for High-Throughput δ18O and δ2H Measurement in Water Using "Express" Mode.

Cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) is rapidly becoming an invaluable tool to measure hydrogen (δ²H) and oxygen (δ18O) isotopic compositions in water, yet the long-term accuracy and precision of this technique remain relatively underreported. Here, we critically evaluate one-year performance of CRDS δ²H and δ18O measurements at ETH Zurich, focusing on high throughput (~200 samples per week) while maintaining required precision and accuracy for diverse scientific investigations. We detail a comprehensive methodological and calibration strategy to optimize CRDS reliability for continuous, high-throughput analysis using Picarro's "Express" mode, an area not extensively explored previously. Using this strategy, we demonstrate that CRDS achieves long-term precision better than ±0.5‰ for δ18O and ±1.0‰ for δ²H (±1σ) on three United States Geological Survey (USGS) reference materials treated as unknowns.18 Specifically, reported results for each reference material over this one-year period are: (i) USGS W-67444: δ2H = -399.32±0.96, δ18O = -51.07±0.45 (n=30), (ii) USGS W-67400: δ2H = 2.55±0.49, δ18O = -1.85±0.13 (n=140), and (iii) USGS-50: δ2H = 33.68±0.91, δ18O = 5.03±0.04 (n=21). We also address challenges such as aligning our analytical uncertainties with the narrower uncertainties of International Atomic Energy Agency reference materials, and mitigating inherent CRDS issues like memory and matrix effects when analyzing environmental samples. Our review provides a practical framework for CRDS applications in hydrology, paleoclimatology, and biogeochemistry, underscoring the importance of continuous evaluation and methodological refinement to ensure accuracy and precision in δ²H and δ18O analyses.18.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Spectroscopy
Applied Spectroscopy 工程技术-光谱学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Applied Spectroscopy is one of the world''s leading spectroscopy journals, publishing high-quality peer-reviewed articles, both fundamental and applied, covering all aspects of spectroscopy. Established in 1951, the journal is owned by the Society for Applied Spectroscopy and is published monthly. The journal is dedicated to fulfilling the mission of the Society to “…advance and disseminate knowledge and information concerning the art and science of spectroscopy and other allied sciences.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信