一种推断妊娠损失影响的新方法。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michael Leung, Sebastian T Rowland, Anna M Modest, Michele R Hacker, Stefania Papatheodorou, Yaguang Wei, Joel Schwartz, Brent A Coull, Ander Wilson, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Marc G Weisskopf
{"title":"一种推断妊娠损失影响的新方法。","authors":"Michael Leung, Sebastian T Rowland, Anna M Modest, Michele R Hacker, Stefania Papatheodorou, Yaguang Wei, Joel Schwartz, Brent A Coull, Ander Wilson, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Marc G Weisskopf","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying the determinants of pregnancy loss is a critical public health concern. However, pregnancy loss is often not noticed, and even when it is, it is inconsistently recorded. Thus, past studies have been limited to medically-identified losses or small, highly selected cohorts, which can lead to biased or non-generalizable results. We show mathematically and through simulations a novel approach that overcomes this measurement challenge to infer effects about pregnancy loss by utilizing more available data: the number of conceptions that led to live births-i.e., live-birth-identified conceptions (LBICs). We simulated ten years of conceptions, pregnancies, losses, and births under several confounding patterns, and two NO2-pregnancy loss relationships (no effect, mid-gestation effect). We fitted distributed lag models (DLMs) adjusted for season, year, and temperature, and assessed model performance through bias and coverage. Our simulations showed that our models, across all scenarios, identified the two NO2-pregnancy loss relationships with appropriate coverage (>90% of confidence intervals captured the true effect) and low bias (never exceeded ±2%). In an applied example using NO2-a traffic emissions tracer-and live birth data from a large tertiary-care hospital in Massachusetts, USA, we found that higher prenatal NO2 was associated with more pregnancy losses. Our proposed approach based on LBICs provides an alternative way to study causes of pregnancy loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel approach for inferring effects on pregnancy loss.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Leung, Sebastian T Rowland, Anna M Modest, Michele R Hacker, Stefania Papatheodorou, Yaguang Wei, Joel Schwartz, Brent A Coull, Ander Wilson, Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou, Marc G Weisskopf\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/aje/kwae475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identifying the determinants of pregnancy loss is a critical public health concern. However, pregnancy loss is often not noticed, and even when it is, it is inconsistently recorded. Thus, past studies have been limited to medically-identified losses or small, highly selected cohorts, which can lead to biased or non-generalizable results. We show mathematically and through simulations a novel approach that overcomes this measurement challenge to infer effects about pregnancy loss by utilizing more available data: the number of conceptions that led to live births-i.e., live-birth-identified conceptions (LBICs). We simulated ten years of conceptions, pregnancies, losses, and births under several confounding patterns, and two NO2-pregnancy loss relationships (no effect, mid-gestation effect). We fitted distributed lag models (DLMs) adjusted for season, year, and temperature, and assessed model performance through bias and coverage. Our simulations showed that our models, across all scenarios, identified the two NO2-pregnancy loss relationships with appropriate coverage (>90% of confidence intervals captured the true effect) and low bias (never exceeded ±2%). In an applied example using NO2-a traffic emissions tracer-and live birth data from a large tertiary-care hospital in Massachusetts, USA, we found that higher prenatal NO2 was associated with more pregnancy losses. Our proposed approach based on LBICs provides an alternative way to study causes of pregnancy loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定流产的决定因素是一个重要的公共卫生问题。然而,流产往往没有被注意到,即使有,记录也不一致。因此,过去的研究仅限于医学上确定的损失或小的,高度选择的队列,这可能导致有偏见或不可推广的结果。我们通过数学和模拟展示了一种新的方法,该方法克服了这一测量挑战,通过利用更多可用的数据来推断怀孕损失的影响:导致活产的概念数量-即。活产鉴定概念(lbic)。我们在几种混杂模式下模拟了十年的受孕、怀孕、流产和分娩,以及两种no2 -妊娠流产关系(无影响,妊娠中期影响)。我们拟合了经过季节、年份和温度调整的分布滞后模型(DLMs),并通过偏倚和覆盖评估了模型的性能。我们的模拟表明,我们的模型在所有情况下都确定了两种no2 -妊娠损失关系,具有适当的覆盖率(bb0 - 90%的置信区间捕获了真实效果)和低偏差(从未超过±2%)。在使用二氧化氮(一种交通排放示踪剂)和美国马萨诸塞州一家大型三级医院的活产数据的应用示例中,我们发现产前二氧化氮含量较高与更多的妊娠损失相关。我们提出的基于lbic的方法为研究妊娠丢失的原因提供了另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel approach for inferring effects on pregnancy loss.

Identifying the determinants of pregnancy loss is a critical public health concern. However, pregnancy loss is often not noticed, and even when it is, it is inconsistently recorded. Thus, past studies have been limited to medically-identified losses or small, highly selected cohorts, which can lead to biased or non-generalizable results. We show mathematically and through simulations a novel approach that overcomes this measurement challenge to infer effects about pregnancy loss by utilizing more available data: the number of conceptions that led to live births-i.e., live-birth-identified conceptions (LBICs). We simulated ten years of conceptions, pregnancies, losses, and births under several confounding patterns, and two NO2-pregnancy loss relationships (no effect, mid-gestation effect). We fitted distributed lag models (DLMs) adjusted for season, year, and temperature, and assessed model performance through bias and coverage. Our simulations showed that our models, across all scenarios, identified the two NO2-pregnancy loss relationships with appropriate coverage (>90% of confidence intervals captured the true effect) and low bias (never exceeded ±2%). In an applied example using NO2-a traffic emissions tracer-and live birth data from a large tertiary-care hospital in Massachusetts, USA, we found that higher prenatal NO2 was associated with more pregnancy losses. Our proposed approach based on LBICs provides an alternative way to study causes of pregnancy loss.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信