{"title":"体外冲击波治疗中风后肢体功能障碍:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wen-Fang Liu, Shuang-Mei Zhang","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a novel and noninvasive approach for alleviating spasticity and pain, improving motor dysfunction after stroke. To determine the effectiveness of ESWT and the effects of shock wave parameters in relieving spasticity, pain, and motor dysfunction following stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials on ESWT for limb dysfunction after stroke from inception until February 1, 2023. Two researchers independently searched and screened articles identified from each database, used RevMan v.5.4 analyzing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included nine articles and 327 patients. ESWT improved the spasticity, pain, and motor function following stroke. They also improved the passive range of motion in the lower limbs. The treatment effect was highest when the shock wave frequency was <8 Hz and pressure was <2 bar. However, the effect was not significantly affected by treatment duration. Compared to focused extracorporeal shock waves, released extracorporeal shock waves were associated with better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment outcomes are optimal when a shock wave frequency < 8 Hz, pressure < 2 bar, and released extracorporeal shock waves are used.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Limb Dysfunction after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Fang Liu, Shuang-Mei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recently, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a novel and noninvasive approach for alleviating spasticity and pain, improving motor dysfunction after stroke. To determine the effectiveness of ESWT and the effects of shock wave parameters in relieving spasticity, pain, and motor dysfunction following stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials on ESWT for limb dysfunction after stroke from inception until February 1, 2023. Two researchers independently searched and screened articles identified from each database, used RevMan v.5.4 analyzing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included nine articles and 327 patients. ESWT improved the spasticity, pain, and motor function following stroke. They also improved the passive range of motion in the lower limbs. The treatment effect was highest when the shock wave frequency was <8 Hz and pressure was <2 bar. However, the effect was not significantly affected by treatment duration. Compared to focused extracorporeal shock waves, released extracorporeal shock waves were associated with better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment outcomes are optimal when a shock wave frequency < 8 Hz, pressure < 2 bar, and released extracorporeal shock waves are used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002694\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:近年来,体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)已成为一种新的无创方法,用于缓解中风后的痉挛和疼痛,改善运动功能障碍。目的:探讨ESWT的有效性和冲击波参数在缓解脑卒中后痉挛、疼痛和运动功能障碍中的作用。设计:我们对PubMed、EBSCOhost、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库进行了系统检索,从研究开始到2023年2月1日,对ESWT治疗中风后肢体功能障碍的随机对照试验进行了检索。两名研究者独立地从每个数据库中检索和筛选文章,使用RevMan v.5.4进行数据分析。结果:本综述纳入9篇文章和327例患者。ESWT改善了中风后的痉挛、疼痛和运动功能。他们还改善了下肢的被动活动范围。结论:冲击波频率< 8 Hz,压力< 2 bar,体外释放冲击波治疗效果最佳。
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Limb Dysfunction after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Objective: Recently, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has emerged as a novel and noninvasive approach for alleviating spasticity and pain, improving motor dysfunction after stroke. To determine the effectiveness of ESWT and the effects of shock wave parameters in relieving spasticity, pain, and motor dysfunction following stroke.
Design: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials on ESWT for limb dysfunction after stroke from inception until February 1, 2023. Two researchers independently searched and screened articles identified from each database, used RevMan v.5.4 analyzing data.
Results: This review included nine articles and 327 patients. ESWT improved the spasticity, pain, and motor function following stroke. They also improved the passive range of motion in the lower limbs. The treatment effect was highest when the shock wave frequency was <8 Hz and pressure was <2 bar. However, the effect was not significantly affected by treatment duration. Compared to focused extracorporeal shock waves, released extracorporeal shock waves were associated with better outcomes.
Conclusion: The treatment outcomes are optimal when a shock wave frequency < 8 Hz, pressure < 2 bar, and released extracorporeal shock waves are used.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals.
Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).