当代治疗腋臭的算法:现有治疗方法综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Qian Lin, Beichen Cai, Lu Chen, Xiaofen Wan, Ruonan Ke, Xuejun Ni, Xiuying Shan, Biao Wang
{"title":"当代治疗腋臭的算法:现有治疗方法综述。","authors":"Qian Lin, Beichen Cai, Lu Chen, Xiaofen Wan, Ruonan Ke, Xuejun Ni, Xiuying Shan, Biao Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00266-024-04633-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bromhidrosis significantly impacts individuals' social, professional, and emotional well-being. Traditional treatments such as en bloc excision and alcohol injections are now less favored due to associated complications and suboptimal outcomes. Current evidence identifies botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) as the first-line treatment for mild to moderate cases (Grade 0-2), attributed to its high efficacy, excellent safety profile, and minimally invasive nature. BTX-A achieves effectiveness rates exceeding 90%, with results persisting for 3-8 months. A standardized grading system guides treatment selection, reserving surgical interventions for severe cases (Grade 3) or situations where BTX-A is contraindicated. Modern surgical approaches, such as hydrosurgery and endoscopic-assisted procedures, have shown improved outcomes and significantly fewer complications compared to traditional methods. Energy-based therapies, including laser, radiofrequency, and microwave treatments, also provide viable alternatives for patients unsuitable for BTX-A, demonstrating documented efficacy and minimal invasiveness. This review proposes an evidence-based treatment algorithm for bromhidrosis management, highlighting the central role of BTX-A while detailing alternative strategies. The framework integrates disease severity assessment, patient preferences, and cost considerations to support optimal clinical decision-making. By adopting this systematic approach, clinicians can enhance treatment selection and improve patient outcomes.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary Algorithm for Treating Bromhidrosis: A Review of Treatment Available.\",\"authors\":\"Qian Lin, Beichen Cai, Lu Chen, Xiaofen Wan, Ruonan Ke, Xuejun Ni, Xiuying Shan, Biao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00266-024-04633-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bromhidrosis significantly impacts individuals' social, professional, and emotional well-being. Traditional treatments such as en bloc excision and alcohol injections are now less favored due to associated complications and suboptimal outcomes. Current evidence identifies botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) as the first-line treatment for mild to moderate cases (Grade 0-2), attributed to its high efficacy, excellent safety profile, and minimally invasive nature. BTX-A achieves effectiveness rates exceeding 90%, with results persisting for 3-8 months. A standardized grading system guides treatment selection, reserving surgical interventions for severe cases (Grade 3) or situations where BTX-A is contraindicated. Modern surgical approaches, such as hydrosurgery and endoscopic-assisted procedures, have shown improved outcomes and significantly fewer complications compared to traditional methods. Energy-based therapies, including laser, radiofrequency, and microwave treatments, also provide viable alternatives for patients unsuitable for BTX-A, demonstrating documented efficacy and minimal invasiveness. This review proposes an evidence-based treatment algorithm for bromhidrosis management, highlighting the central role of BTX-A while detailing alternative strategies. The framework integrates disease severity assessment, patient preferences, and cost considerations to support optimal clinical decision-making. By adopting this systematic approach, clinicians can enhance treatment selection and improve patient outcomes.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04633-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04633-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腋臭会显著影响个人的社交、职业和情感健康。传统的治疗方法,如整体切除和酒精注射,由于相关的并发症和不理想的结果,现在不太受欢迎。目前的证据确定肉毒毒素A (BTX-A)作为轻中度病例(0-2级)的一线治疗方法,由于其高效、优异的安全性和微创性。BTX-A有效率超过90%,效果持续3-8个月。一个标准化的分级系统指导治疗选择,为严重病例(3级)或BTX-A禁忌的情况保留手术干预。现代手术方法,如水手术和内窥镜辅助手术,与传统方法相比,已经显示出改善的结果和显著减少的并发症。能量疗法,包括激光、射频和微波治疗,也为不适合BTX-A的患者提供了可行的替代方案,证明了文献记载的疗效和最小的侵入性。本综述提出了一种基于证据的腋臭治疗算法,强调了BTX-A的核心作用,同时详细介绍了替代策略。该框架整合了疾病严重程度评估、患者偏好和成本考虑,以支持最佳临床决策。通过采用这种系统的方法,临床医生可以加强治疗选择并改善患者的预后。证据等级V本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary Algorithm for Treating Bromhidrosis: A Review of Treatment Available.

Bromhidrosis significantly impacts individuals' social, professional, and emotional well-being. Traditional treatments such as en bloc excision and alcohol injections are now less favored due to associated complications and suboptimal outcomes. Current evidence identifies botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) as the first-line treatment for mild to moderate cases (Grade 0-2), attributed to its high efficacy, excellent safety profile, and minimally invasive nature. BTX-A achieves effectiveness rates exceeding 90%, with results persisting for 3-8 months. A standardized grading system guides treatment selection, reserving surgical interventions for severe cases (Grade 3) or situations where BTX-A is contraindicated. Modern surgical approaches, such as hydrosurgery and endoscopic-assisted procedures, have shown improved outcomes and significantly fewer complications compared to traditional methods. Energy-based therapies, including laser, radiofrequency, and microwave treatments, also provide viable alternatives for patients unsuitable for BTX-A, demonstrating documented efficacy and minimal invasiveness. This review proposes an evidence-based treatment algorithm for bromhidrosis management, highlighting the central role of BTX-A while detailing alternative strategies. The framework integrates disease severity assessment, patient preferences, and cost considerations to support optimal clinical decision-making. By adopting this systematic approach, clinicians can enhance treatment selection and improve patient outcomes.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors  www.springer.com/00266 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信