纳武单抗和伊匹单抗联合或不联合化疗治疗不可切除的非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项多中心回顾性观察性研究

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Toshiyuki Sumi, Yutaro Nagano, Keiki Yokoo, Tatsuru Ishikawa, Hirotaka Nishikiori, Osamu Honjo, Sayaka Kudo, Masami Yamazoe, Shun Kondoh, Makoto Shioya, Mitsuo Otsuka, Midori Hashimoto, Hayato Yabe, Yusuke Tanaka, Yuta Sudo, Masahiro Yanagi, Mamoru Takahashi, Hirofumi Chiba
{"title":"纳武单抗和伊匹单抗联合或不联合化疗治疗不可切除的非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项多中心回顾性观察性研究","authors":"Toshiyuki Sumi, Yutaro Nagano, Keiki Yokoo, Tatsuru Ishikawa, Hirotaka Nishikiori, Osamu Honjo, Sayaka Kudo, Masami Yamazoe, Shun Kondoh, Makoto Shioya, Mitsuo Otsuka, Midori Hashimoto, Hayato Yabe, Yusuke Tanaka, Yuta Sudo, Masahiro Yanagi, Mamoru Takahashi, Hirofumi Chiba","doi":"10.1007/s00262-024-03890-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Compared to platinum-based therapies, a combination of ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) has demonstrated improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with higher rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy (NI and NICT) in real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 215 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients who received NI or NICT between December 2020 and May 2023 at 14 institutions in Japan. Severe irAEs (Grade ≥ 3) were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 215 patients, 104 and 111 received NI and NICT, respectively. The median PFS was 5.3 and 5.9 months for NI and NICT, respectively. The median OS was 22.1 and 19.2 months for NI and NICT, respectively. High fever within 3 weeks of treatment initiation and high tumor burden were indicators of severe irAEs. Grade 3 or higher irAEs occurred in 36.5% patients in the NI group and 50.5% patients in the NICT group, with higher treatment-related mortality in the NICT group (5.4% vs. 1.9% in NI).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NI and NICT showed comparable efficacies in PFS and OS. However, NICT had a higher incidence of severe irAEs and treatment-related mortality. High tumor burden and early high fever were predictors of severe irAEs. Further research is warranted to optimize the efficacy and safety of NICT for NSCLC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"74 2","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Toshiyuki Sumi, Yutaro Nagano, Keiki Yokoo, Tatsuru Ishikawa, Hirotaka Nishikiori, Osamu Honjo, Sayaka Kudo, Masami Yamazoe, Shun Kondoh, Makoto Shioya, Mitsuo Otsuka, Midori Hashimoto, Hayato Yabe, Yusuke Tanaka, Yuta Sudo, Masahiro Yanagi, Mamoru Takahashi, Hirofumi Chiba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00262-024-03890-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Compared to platinum-based therapies, a combination of ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) has demonstrated improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with higher rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy (NI and NICT) in real-world clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 215 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients who received NI or NICT between December 2020 and May 2023 at 14 institutions in Japan. Severe irAEs (Grade ≥ 3) were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 215 patients, 104 and 111 received NI and NICT, respectively. The median PFS was 5.3 and 5.9 months for NI and NICT, respectively. The median OS was 22.1 and 19.2 months for NI and NICT, respectively. High fever within 3 weeks of treatment initiation and high tumor burden were indicators of severe irAEs. Grade 3 or higher irAEs occurred in 36.5% patients in the NI group and 50.5% patients in the NICT group, with higher treatment-related mortality in the NICT group (5.4% vs. 1.9% in NI).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NI and NICT showed comparable efficacies in PFS and OS. However, NICT had a higher incidence of severe irAEs and treatment-related mortality. High tumor burden and early high fever were predictors of severe irAEs. Further research is warranted to optimize the efficacy and safety of NICT for NSCLC treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\"74 2\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-024-03890-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-024-03890-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与铂基治疗相比,ipilimumab(抗ctla -4)和nivolumab(抗pd -1)联合治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效得到改善,尽管免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)发生率较高。这项多中心回顾性研究评估了nivolumab和ipilimumab在现实世界临床环境中联合或不联合化疗(NI和NICT)的疗效和安全性。方法:在2020年12月至2023年5月期间,我们在日本的14家机构招募了215名treatment-naïve非小细胞肺癌患者接受NI或NICT治疗。使用不良事件通用术语标准评估严重irAEs(≥3级)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和倾向评分匹配评估无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:215例患者中,分别有104例和111例接受了NI和NICT治疗。NI和NICT的中位PFS分别为5.3和5.9个月。NI和NICT的中位生存期分别为22.1和19.2个月。治疗开始3周内高热和高肿瘤负荷是严重irAEs的指标。NI组和NICT组分别有36.5%和50.5%的患者发生了3级或以上的irae, NICT组的治疗相关死亡率更高(5.4% vs. 1.9%)。结论:NI和NICT治疗PFS和OS的疗效相当。然而,NICT有较高的严重irae发生率和治疗相关死亡率。高肿瘤负荷和早期高热是严重irAEs的预测因素。需要进一步研究优化NICT治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective observational study.

Introduction: Compared to platinum-based therapies, a combination of ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1) has demonstrated improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with higher rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy (NI and NICT) in real-world clinical settings.

Methods: We enrolled 215 treatment-naïve NSCLC patients who received NI or NICT between December 2020 and May 2023 at 14 institutions in Japan. Severe irAEs (Grade ≥ 3) were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and propensity score matching.

Results: Of 215 patients, 104 and 111 received NI and NICT, respectively. The median PFS was 5.3 and 5.9 months for NI and NICT, respectively. The median OS was 22.1 and 19.2 months for NI and NICT, respectively. High fever within 3 weeks of treatment initiation and high tumor burden were indicators of severe irAEs. Grade 3 or higher irAEs occurred in 36.5% patients in the NI group and 50.5% patients in the NICT group, with higher treatment-related mortality in the NICT group (5.4% vs. 1.9% in NI).

Conclusions: NI and NICT showed comparable efficacies in PFS and OS. However, NICT had a higher incidence of severe irAEs and treatment-related mortality. High tumor burden and early high fever were predictors of severe irAEs. Further research is warranted to optimize the efficacy and safety of NICT for NSCLC treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
207
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions. The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信