{"title":"对不同来源的电力、氢、甲醇和液化天然气燃料驱动的不同重型车辆进行全面排放和能源消耗生命周期评估","authors":"Tushar Chhugani, Ramin Rahmani","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This comprehensive study provides a detailed Well to Wheels (WTW) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of various Heavy-duty Vehicles (HDVs) including a Long-Haul Truck (LHT), Intercity Bus (ICB), and Refuse Truck (RT) powered by different energy sources and fuels including electricity, hydrogen, methanol, Liquified Natural Gas (LNG), and Low Sulphur (LS) diesel for benchmarking. The findings show that Hydrogen from renewable sources offers the lowest WTW CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf>, CH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf>, and NOx emissions, though its production is energy intensive. Methanol and hydrogen from Natural Gas (NG) exhibit the highest emissions due to high fuel consumption and energy-intensive production processes. LNG shows lower CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf> and NOx emissions compared to LS diesel but higher CH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf> emissions, necessitating improvements in LNG production. Electrically powered HDVs, despite reducing NOx emissions, produce comparable CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf> and higher CH<ce:inf loc=\"post\">4</ce:inf> emissions due to the current global electricity mix. Amongst the studied HDV types, RTs exhibit the highest WTW CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf> and energy consumption due to frequent stops and idling, while LHTs show the lowest emissions and energy consumption. LNG-fuelled RT and LHT reduce WTW CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf> emissions by 8% and 5.6%, and NOx emissions by around 31% and 33%, respectively, compared to LS diesel. The study underscores the need for tailored solutions based on HDV type, advancements in renewable energy infrastructure, and supportive policies to facilitate the transition to sustainable fuel technologies. Focus on developing infrastructure for production of hydrogen from renewable sources, supporting innovations in energy efficient fuel production technologies, and the need for enhancing energy efficiency of vehicular powertrain to achieve a sustainable HDV sector are also highlighted.","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full emissions and energy consumption life cycle assessment of different Heavy-Duty vehicles powered by Electricity, Hydrogen, Methanol, and LNG fuels produced from various sources\",\"authors\":\"Tushar Chhugani, Ramin Rahmani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This comprehensive study provides a detailed Well to Wheels (WTW) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of various Heavy-duty Vehicles (HDVs) including a Long-Haul Truck (LHT), Intercity Bus (ICB), and Refuse Truck (RT) powered by different energy sources and fuels including electricity, hydrogen, methanol, Liquified Natural Gas (LNG), and Low Sulphur (LS) diesel for benchmarking. The findings show that Hydrogen from renewable sources offers the lowest WTW CO<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:inf>, CH<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">4</ce:inf>, and NOx emissions, though its production is energy intensive. Methanol and hydrogen from Natural Gas (NG) exhibit the highest emissions due to high fuel consumption and energy-intensive production processes. LNG shows lower CO<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:inf> and NOx emissions compared to LS diesel but higher CH<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">4</ce:inf> emissions, necessitating improvements in LNG production. Electrically powered HDVs, despite reducing NOx emissions, produce comparable CO<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:inf> and higher CH<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">4</ce:inf> emissions due to the current global electricity mix. Amongst the studied HDV types, RTs exhibit the highest WTW CO<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:inf> and energy consumption due to frequent stops and idling, while LHTs show the lowest emissions and energy consumption. LNG-fuelled RT and LHT reduce WTW CO<ce:inf loc=\\\"post\\\">2</ce:inf> emissions by 8% and 5.6%, and NOx emissions by around 31% and 33%, respectively, compared to LS diesel. The study underscores the need for tailored solutions based on HDV type, advancements in renewable energy infrastructure, and supportive policies to facilitate the transition to sustainable fuel technologies. Focus on developing infrastructure for production of hydrogen from renewable sources, supporting innovations in energy efficient fuel production technologies, and the need for enhancing energy efficiency of vehicular powertrain to achieve a sustainable HDV sector are also highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119439\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Full emissions and energy consumption life cycle assessment of different Heavy-Duty vehicles powered by Electricity, Hydrogen, Methanol, and LNG fuels produced from various sources
This comprehensive study provides a detailed Well to Wheels (WTW) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of various Heavy-duty Vehicles (HDVs) including a Long-Haul Truck (LHT), Intercity Bus (ICB), and Refuse Truck (RT) powered by different energy sources and fuels including electricity, hydrogen, methanol, Liquified Natural Gas (LNG), and Low Sulphur (LS) diesel for benchmarking. The findings show that Hydrogen from renewable sources offers the lowest WTW CO2, CH4, and NOx emissions, though its production is energy intensive. Methanol and hydrogen from Natural Gas (NG) exhibit the highest emissions due to high fuel consumption and energy-intensive production processes. LNG shows lower CO2 and NOx emissions compared to LS diesel but higher CH4 emissions, necessitating improvements in LNG production. Electrically powered HDVs, despite reducing NOx emissions, produce comparable CO2 and higher CH4 emissions due to the current global electricity mix. Amongst the studied HDV types, RTs exhibit the highest WTW CO2 and energy consumption due to frequent stops and idling, while LHTs show the lowest emissions and energy consumption. LNG-fuelled RT and LHT reduce WTW CO2 emissions by 8% and 5.6%, and NOx emissions by around 31% and 33%, respectively, compared to LS diesel. The study underscores the need for tailored solutions based on HDV type, advancements in renewable energy infrastructure, and supportive policies to facilitate the transition to sustainable fuel technologies. Focus on developing infrastructure for production of hydrogen from renewable sources, supporting innovations in energy efficient fuel production technologies, and the need for enhancing energy efficiency of vehicular powertrain to achieve a sustainable HDV sector are also highlighted.
期刊介绍:
The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics.
The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.