Natasha Harvey, Sean P. Burns, Keith N. Musselman, Holly Barnard, Peter D. Blanken
{"title":"亚高山森林冠层积雪识别方法的比较研究","authors":"Natasha Harvey, Sean P. Burns, Keith N. Musselman, Holly Barnard, Peter D. Blanken","doi":"10.1029/2023wr036996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interception of snow by the canopy is an important process in the water and energy balance in cold-region coniferous forests. Direct measurements of canopy snow interception are difficult at scales larger than individual trees, requiring indirect methods such as eddy covariance, time-lapse photography, or modeling. At the Niwot Ridge Subalpine Forest AmeriFlux site in the Colorado Front Range, USA, we compared methods that estimate or simulate the presence of snow interception. Timelapse photography images were analyzed using thresholding analysis and used to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to estimate canopy snow presence. Interception was also estimated from eddy covariance measurements above and below the canopy, as well as from model simulations. These methods were applied over January 2019, with binarized results compared to a “ground truth” of human labeled images to calculate the Balanced Accuracy Score. The highest accuracy was achieved by the CNN predictions. Based on the Balanced Accuracy Scores, select methods were extended to estimate the presence of canopy snow for the 2018/2019 winter. All methods provided insight into the process of interception in a subalpine forest but presented challenges, including differing flux footprints of the above- and below-canopy eddy covariance measurements and the inability of red-green-blue imagery to monitor snow interception at night, during sunrise, and during sunset.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Canopy Snow in Subalpine Forests: A Comparative Study of Methods\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Harvey, Sean P. Burns, Keith N. Musselman, Holly Barnard, Peter D. Blanken\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023wr036996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The interception of snow by the canopy is an important process in the water and energy balance in cold-region coniferous forests. Direct measurements of canopy snow interception are difficult at scales larger than individual trees, requiring indirect methods such as eddy covariance, time-lapse photography, or modeling. At the Niwot Ridge Subalpine Forest AmeriFlux site in the Colorado Front Range, USA, we compared methods that estimate or simulate the presence of snow interception. Timelapse photography images were analyzed using thresholding analysis and used to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to estimate canopy snow presence. Interception was also estimated from eddy covariance measurements above and below the canopy, as well as from model simulations. These methods were applied over January 2019, with binarized results compared to a “ground truth” of human labeled images to calculate the Balanced Accuracy Score. The highest accuracy was achieved by the CNN predictions. Based on the Balanced Accuracy Scores, select methods were extended to estimate the presence of canopy snow for the 2018/2019 winter. All methods provided insight into the process of interception in a subalpine forest but presented challenges, including differing flux footprints of the above- and below-canopy eddy covariance measurements and the inability of red-green-blue imagery to monitor snow interception at night, during sunrise, and during sunset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036996\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036996","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
冠层截流积雪是寒区针叶林水能平衡的重要过程。在比单个树木更大的尺度上,直接测量冠层积雪拦截是困难的,需要间接方法,如涡动相关、延时摄影或建模。在美国Colorado Front Range的Niwot Ridge亚高山森林AmeriFlux站点,我们比较了估算或模拟雪拦截存在的方法。使用阈值分析对延时摄影图像进行分析,并用于训练卷积神经网络(CNN)模型来估计冠层积雪的存在。截流也通过冠层上方和下方的涡动相关测量以及模式模拟进行了估计。这些方法于2019年1月应用,将二值化结果与人类标记图像的“基本事实”进行比较,以计算平衡精度分数。准确度最高的是CNN的预测。基于平衡精度分数,将选择的方法扩展到估计2018/2019冬季冠层积雪的存在。所有方法都提供了对亚高山森林拦截过程的深入了解,但也存在挑战,包括冠层上方和冠层下方涡动相关测量的通量足迹不同,以及红绿蓝图像无法监测夜间、日出和日落期间的积雪拦截。
Identifying Canopy Snow in Subalpine Forests: A Comparative Study of Methods
The interception of snow by the canopy is an important process in the water and energy balance in cold-region coniferous forests. Direct measurements of canopy snow interception are difficult at scales larger than individual trees, requiring indirect methods such as eddy covariance, time-lapse photography, or modeling. At the Niwot Ridge Subalpine Forest AmeriFlux site in the Colorado Front Range, USA, we compared methods that estimate or simulate the presence of snow interception. Timelapse photography images were analyzed using thresholding analysis and used to train a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to estimate canopy snow presence. Interception was also estimated from eddy covariance measurements above and below the canopy, as well as from model simulations. These methods were applied over January 2019, with binarized results compared to a “ground truth” of human labeled images to calculate the Balanced Accuracy Score. The highest accuracy was achieved by the CNN predictions. Based on the Balanced Accuracy Scores, select methods were extended to estimate the presence of canopy snow for the 2018/2019 winter. All methods provided insight into the process of interception in a subalpine forest but presented challenges, including differing flux footprints of the above- and below-canopy eddy covariance measurements and the inability of red-green-blue imagery to monitor snow interception at night, during sunrise, and during sunset.
期刊介绍:
Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.