呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的微生物特征和抗菌素耐药性模式:来自叙利亚的横断面研究。

K A Khalil, M Alsultan, N A Daher
{"title":"呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的微生物特征和抗菌素耐药性模式:来自叙利亚的横断面研究。","authors":"K A Khalil, M Alsultan, N A Daher","doi":"10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_565_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the bacterial profile and their antibiotic spectrum in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and investigate the risk factors for VAP and the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was included 105 patients with clinically suspected VAP in intensive care units (ICUs) of two university hospitals from Syria, between January 2023 and February 2024. Culture-positive included 69 samples (65.7%), which were classified based on post-intubation as early-onset (<5 days) or late-onset (≥5 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were observed in 82.6% and 17.4%; respectively. Early and late-onset VAP was reported in 30 (43.5%) and 39 (56.5%) patients; respectively. The primary cause of early-onset VAP was Acinetobacter and Enterobacter , whereas Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were the main causes of late-onset VAP. Gram-negative showed a high resistance to fluoroquinolones (91.2%), carbapenems (78.9% for imipenem and 86% for meropenem), and amikacin (83.2%), while all were sensitive to colistin. Gram-positive was sensitive to tetracycline, vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. MDR was observed in 55 patients (79.7%) and in early (76.9%) and late-onset (83.3%) VAP. There were no risk factors favoring MDR or early compared to late-onset VAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed a high prevalence of Gram-negative among VAP patients. A significant prevalence of MDR pathogens was observed in early and late-onset VAP, along with high resistance to carbapenems. This necessitates a reassessment of the current use of antibiotics and highlights the need for further studies to choose alternative treatments for empirical antibiotic coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94105,"journal":{"name":"Journal of postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP): A cross-sectional study from Syria.\",\"authors\":\"K A Khalil, M Alsultan, N A Daher\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_565_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to determine the bacterial profile and their antibiotic spectrum in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and investigate the risk factors for VAP and the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was included 105 patients with clinically suspected VAP in intensive care units (ICUs) of two university hospitals from Syria, between January 2023 and February 2024. Culture-positive included 69 samples (65.7%), which were classified based on post-intubation as early-onset (<5 days) or late-onset (≥5 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were observed in 82.6% and 17.4%; respectively. Early and late-onset VAP was reported in 30 (43.5%) and 39 (56.5%) patients; respectively. The primary cause of early-onset VAP was Acinetobacter and Enterobacter , whereas Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were the main causes of late-onset VAP. Gram-negative showed a high resistance to fluoroquinolones (91.2%), carbapenems (78.9% for imipenem and 86% for meropenem), and amikacin (83.2%), while all were sensitive to colistin. Gram-positive was sensitive to tetracycline, vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. MDR was observed in 55 patients (79.7%) and in early (76.9%) and late-onset (83.3%) VAP. There were no risk factors favoring MDR or early compared to late-onset VAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study revealed a high prevalence of Gram-negative among VAP patients. A significant prevalence of MDR pathogens was observed in early and late-onset VAP, along with high resistance to carbapenems. This necessitates a reassessment of the current use of antibiotics and highlights the need for further studies to choose alternative treatments for empirical antibiotic coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of postgraduate medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of postgraduate medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_565_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_565_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究旨在确定呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)患者的细菌谱及其抗生素谱,并探讨VAP的危险因素和多药耐药(MDR)病原体的存在。材料和方法:横断面研究纳入了叙利亚两所大学医院重症监护病房(icu)的105例临床疑似VAP患者,时间为2023年1月至2024年2月。培养阳性69例(65.7%),根据插管后分类为早发性(结果:革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌分别占82.6%和17.4%;分别。早发性和晚发性VAP分别为30例(43.5%)和39例(56.5%);分别。早发型VAP的主要病因是不动杆菌和肠杆菌,而迟发性VAP的主要病因是克雷伯菌和不动杆菌。革兰氏阴性对氟喹诺酮类(91.2%)、碳青霉烯类(亚胺培南78.9%、美罗培南86%)、阿米卡星(83.2%)耐药较高,对粘菌素均敏感。革兰氏阳性对四环素、万古霉素、利奈唑胺、替加环素、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑敏感。55例(79.7%)、早期(76.9%)和迟发性VAP(83.3%)出现多药耐药。与晚发性VAP相比,耐多药或早发性VAP没有风险因素。结论:该研究揭示了VAP患者中革兰氏阴性的高患病率。在早期和晚发性VAP中观察到耐多药病原体的显著患病率,同时对碳青霉烯类具有高耐药性。这需要对目前抗生素的使用进行重新评估,并强调需要进一步研究,以选择替代治疗的经验抗生素覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbial profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP): A cross-sectional study from Syria.

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the bacterial profile and their antibiotic spectrum in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and investigate the risk factors for VAP and the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was included 105 patients with clinically suspected VAP in intensive care units (ICUs) of two university hospitals from Syria, between January 2023 and February 2024. Culture-positive included 69 samples (65.7%), which were classified based on post-intubation as early-onset (<5 days) or late-onset (≥5 days).

Results: Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria were observed in 82.6% and 17.4%; respectively. Early and late-onset VAP was reported in 30 (43.5%) and 39 (56.5%) patients; respectively. The primary cause of early-onset VAP was Acinetobacter and Enterobacter , whereas Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were the main causes of late-onset VAP. Gram-negative showed a high resistance to fluoroquinolones (91.2%), carbapenems (78.9% for imipenem and 86% for meropenem), and amikacin (83.2%), while all were sensitive to colistin. Gram-positive was sensitive to tetracycline, vancomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. MDR was observed in 55 patients (79.7%) and in early (76.9%) and late-onset (83.3%) VAP. There were no risk factors favoring MDR or early compared to late-onset VAP.

Conclusions: The study revealed a high prevalence of Gram-negative among VAP patients. A significant prevalence of MDR pathogens was observed in early and late-onset VAP, along with high resistance to carbapenems. This necessitates a reassessment of the current use of antibiotics and highlights the need for further studies to choose alternative treatments for empirical antibiotic coverage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信