摩擦结术语在兽医外科中是不一致的。

IF 0.8 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
J Coleman Wahlborg, Brianna L Grandprey, Stephanie L Shaver, Erik H Hofmeister
{"title":"摩擦结术语在兽医外科中是不一致的。","authors":"J Coleman Wahlborg, Brianna L Grandprey, Stephanie L Shaver, Erik H Hofmeister","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine the nomenclature for friction knots commonly used by veterinary surgeons. Veterinary surgeons certified by the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS) or the European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS) were recruited through email listings available on the websites of veterinary schools and the ACVS to participate in a survey on this subject. Participation was also solicited through the ACVS Facebook page, the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery, and the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. The survey included questions about 4 knot-tying videos. Complete responses were received from 160 veterinary surgeons. Familiarity with the knots ranged from 26% (constrictor knot) to 54% (miller's knot). The modified miller's knot and the miller's knot were correctly named by a majority of surgeons (61% and 63%, respectively). There was no consensus for the constrictor knot, with the greatest number of respondents identifying it as the constrictor knot (38%) or the miller's knot (31%). There was also no consensus for the strangle knot, with respondents split among identifying it as the miller's knot (39%), modified miller's knot (34%), or strangle knot (21%). There is apparent disagreement on the names of surgical friction knots among veterinary surgeons. Many participants indicated that they were not familiar with the knots demonstrated in the videos. Inconsistent terminology may impede educational efforts and hinder clear communication about types of knots.</p>","PeriodicalId":93919,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","volume":"89 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Friction knot terminology is inconsistent in veterinary surgery.\",\"authors\":\"J Coleman Wahlborg, Brianna L Grandprey, Stephanie L Shaver, Erik H Hofmeister\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine the nomenclature for friction knots commonly used by veterinary surgeons. Veterinary surgeons certified by the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS) or the European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS) were recruited through email listings available on the websites of veterinary schools and the ACVS to participate in a survey on this subject. Participation was also solicited through the ACVS Facebook page, the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery, and the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. The survey included questions about 4 knot-tying videos. Complete responses were received from 160 veterinary surgeons. Familiarity with the knots ranged from 26% (constrictor knot) to 54% (miller's knot). The modified miller's knot and the miller's knot were correctly named by a majority of surgeons (61% and 63%, respectively). There was no consensus for the constrictor knot, with the greatest number of respondents identifying it as the constrictor knot (38%) or the miller's knot (31%). There was also no consensus for the strangle knot, with respondents split among identifying it as the miller's knot (39%), modified miller's knot (34%), or strangle knot (21%). There is apparent disagreement on the names of surgical friction knots among veterinary surgeons. Many participants indicated that they were not familiar with the knots demonstrated in the videos. Inconsistent terminology may impede educational efforts and hinder clear communication about types of knots.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"26-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665728/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定兽医常用的摩擦结的命名法。美国兽医学院(ACVS)或欧洲兽医学院(ECVS)认证的兽医通过兽医学校和欧洲兽医学院网站上的电子邮件列表进行招募,参与有关这一主题的调查。通过ACVS Facebook页面、兽医软组织外科学会和兽医骨科学会也征集了参与。调查包括4个打结视频的问题。从160名兽医那里收到了完整的答复。对绳结的熟悉程度从26%(蟒蛇结)到54%(米勒结)不等。改良的米勒结和米勒结被大多数外科医生正确命名(分别为61%和63%)。对于“蟒蛇结”的说法没有达成共识,最多的受访者认为是“蟒蛇结”(38%)或“磨坊主结”(31%)。对于绞绳结也没有达成共识,受访者认为它是磨坊主结(39%),改良磨坊主结(34%)或绞绳结(21%)。兽医对手术摩擦结的名称存在明显的分歧。许多参与者表示,他们不熟悉视频中展示的结。不一致的术语可能会阻碍教育工作,并阻碍对结类型的清晰交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Friction knot terminology is inconsistent in veterinary surgery.

The objective of this study was to determine the nomenclature for friction knots commonly used by veterinary surgeons. Veterinary surgeons certified by the American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS) or the European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS) were recruited through email listings available on the websites of veterinary schools and the ACVS to participate in a survey on this subject. Participation was also solicited through the ACVS Facebook page, the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery, and the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. The survey included questions about 4 knot-tying videos. Complete responses were received from 160 veterinary surgeons. Familiarity with the knots ranged from 26% (constrictor knot) to 54% (miller's knot). The modified miller's knot and the miller's knot were correctly named by a majority of surgeons (61% and 63%, respectively). There was no consensus for the constrictor knot, with the greatest number of respondents identifying it as the constrictor knot (38%) or the miller's knot (31%). There was also no consensus for the strangle knot, with respondents split among identifying it as the miller's knot (39%), modified miller's knot (34%), or strangle knot (21%). There is apparent disagreement on the names of surgical friction knots among veterinary surgeons. Many participants indicated that they were not familiar with the knots demonstrated in the videos. Inconsistent terminology may impede educational efforts and hinder clear communication about types of knots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信