开发和验证的风险评分,以预测不良分娩结局使用孕产妇特征在埃塞俄比亚西北部:回顾性随访研究。

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457
Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema, Ayenew Molla Lakew, Sefineh Fenta Feleke
{"title":"开发和验证的风险评分,以预测不良分娩结局使用孕产妇特征在埃塞俄比亚西北部:回顾性随访研究。","authors":"Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema, Ayenew Molla Lakew, Sefineh Fenta Feleke","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse birth outcomes are unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy that are particularly common in low- and middle-income countries. At least one ultrasound is recommended to predict adverse birth outcomes in early pregnancy. However, in low-income countries, imaging equipment and trained manpower are scarce. According to our search of the literature, there is no validated risk prediction model for predicting adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia. Hence, we developed and validated a model and risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy for use in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective follow-up study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2021, and a total of 910 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Stepwise, backward multivariable analysis was conducted. The model's accuracy was assessed using density plots, discrimination, and calibration. The developed model was assessed for internal validity using bootstrapping techniques and evaluated for clinical utility using decision curve analysis across various threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Premature rupture of Membrane, number of fetuses, residence, pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin level, and labor onset remained in the final multivariable prediction model. The area under the curve of the model was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.812). The developed risk prediction model had a good performance and was well-calibrated and valid. The decision curve analysis indicated the model provides a higher net benefit across the ranges of threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, this study showed the possibility of predicting adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy. The risk prediction model using a simplified risk score helps identify high-risk pregnant women for specific interventions. A feasible score would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality and improve maternal and child health in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1458457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics in northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Rahel Mulatie Anteneh, Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema, Ayenew Molla Lakew, Sefineh Fenta Feleke\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse birth outcomes are unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy that are particularly common in low- and middle-income countries. At least one ultrasound is recommended to predict adverse birth outcomes in early pregnancy. However, in low-income countries, imaging equipment and trained manpower are scarce. According to our search of the literature, there is no validated risk prediction model for predicting adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia. Hence, we developed and validated a model and risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy for use in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective follow-up study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2021, and a total of 910 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Stepwise, backward multivariable analysis was conducted. The model's accuracy was assessed using density plots, discrimination, and calibration. The developed model was assessed for internal validity using bootstrapping techniques and evaluated for clinical utility using decision curve analysis across various threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Premature rupture of Membrane, number of fetuses, residence, pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin level, and labor onset remained in the final multivariable prediction model. The area under the curve of the model was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.812). The developed risk prediction model had a good performance and was well-calibrated and valid. The decision curve analysis indicated the model provides a higher net benefit across the ranges of threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In general, this study showed the possibility of predicting adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy. The risk prediction model using a simplified risk score helps identify high-risk pregnant women for specific interventions. A feasible score would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality and improve maternal and child health in low-resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1458457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688326/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in global women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1458457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不良出生结局是妊娠的不良结局,在低收入和中等收入国家尤为常见。至少一种超声被推荐用于预测妊娠早期不良的出生结果。然而,在低收入国家,成像设备和训练有素的人力是稀缺的。根据我们对文献的搜索,没有有效的风险预测模型来预测埃塞俄比亚的不良出生结果。因此,我们开发并验证了一个模型和风险评分,以在资源有限的情况下使用妊娠期间的母亲特征来预测不良分娩结局。方法:2016年1月1日至2021年5月31日进行回顾性随访研究,共纳入910例孕妇。参与者是通过简单的随机抽样技术选择的。逐步进行后向多变量分析。使用密度图、判别和校准来评估模型的准确性。开发的模型使用自举技术评估内部有效性,并使用决策曲线分析评估各种阈值概率的临床效用。结果:胎膜早破、胎数、居住地、妊高征、产前出血、血红蛋白水平、产程等因素仍然存在于最终的多变量预测模型中。模型曲线下面积为0.77(95%置信区间:0.73-0.812)。所建立的风险预测模型具有良好的准确性和有效性。决策曲线分析表明,该模型在阈值概率范围内提供了更高的净效益。结论:总的来说,本研究显示了利用孕期产妇特征预测不良分娩结局的可能性。使用简化风险评分的风险预测模型有助于识别高危孕妇,以便进行具体干预。可行的评分将降低新生儿发病率和死亡率,并改善资源匮乏地区的孕产妇和儿童健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics in northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective follow-up study.

Background: Adverse birth outcomes are unfavorable outcomes of pregnancy that are particularly common in low- and middle-income countries. At least one ultrasound is recommended to predict adverse birth outcomes in early pregnancy. However, in low-income countries, imaging equipment and trained manpower are scarce. According to our search of the literature, there is no validated risk prediction model for predicting adverse birth outcomes in Ethiopia. Hence, we developed and validated a model and risk score to predict adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy for use in resource-limited settings.

Methods: A retrospective follow-up study was conducted from 1 January 2016 to 31 May 2021, and a total of 910 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Stepwise, backward multivariable analysis was conducted. The model's accuracy was assessed using density plots, discrimination, and calibration. The developed model was assessed for internal validity using bootstrapping techniques and evaluated for clinical utility using decision curve analysis across various threshold probabilities.

Results: Premature rupture of Membrane, number of fetuses, residence, pregnancy-induced hypertension, antepartum hemorrhage, hemoglobin level, and labor onset remained in the final multivariable prediction model. The area under the curve of the model was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.812). The developed risk prediction model had a good performance and was well-calibrated and valid. The decision curve analysis indicated the model provides a higher net benefit across the ranges of threshold probabilities.

Conclusion: In general, this study showed the possibility of predicting adverse birth outcomes using maternal characteristics during pregnancy. The risk prediction model using a simplified risk score helps identify high-risk pregnant women for specific interventions. A feasible score would reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality and improve maternal and child health in low-resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信