帕金森病患者疼痛的特征:类型、预测因素和管理意义。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ceren Alis, Derya Selcuk Demirelli, Elvin Ay, Gencer Genc
{"title":"帕金森病患者疼痛的特征:类型、预测因素和管理意义。","authors":"Ceren Alis, Derya Selcuk Demirelli, Elvin Ay, Gencer Genc","doi":"10.3344/kjp.24245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due to various reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6% of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain. However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":"38 1","pages":"43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing pain in Parkinson's disease: types, predictors, and management implications.\",\"authors\":\"Ceren Alis, Derya Selcuk Demirelli, Elvin Ay, Gencer Genc\",\"doi\":\"10.3344/kjp.24245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due to various reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6% of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain. However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"43-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695247/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.24245\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.24245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疼痛影响帕金森病(PD)患者的生活质量(QoL),但它经常被忽视。本研究旨在综合评价PD患者的疼痛,特别关注神经性疼痛(NP)与其他类型疼痛的差异。方法:我们对PD患者进行了横断面研究,评估疼痛的患病率和特征。采用不同的量表来评估焦虑、抑郁和生活质量。我们调查了疼痛、人口统计学和临床变量之间的关系,以确定预测因素和疼痛相关因素。此外,我们还探讨了NP的相关因素。结果:研究期间共检查109例患者。16例患者因各种原因被排除。最终纳入93例患者,其中女性34例,男性59例。80.6%的PD患者报告有疼痛,有疼痛和没有疼痛的患者之间没有显著的人口统计学或临床差异。然而,较长的疾病持续时间预测NP,肌肉骨骼疼痛在女性中更为普遍。焦虑在中枢性帕金森疼痛(CPP)患者中很常见。服用金刚烷胺的患者报告的神经根性/神经性疼痛(RNP)减少,表明金刚烷胺具有治疗作用。结论:我们的研究结果强调了PD患者中疼痛的高患病率及其对生活质量的影响。NP似乎与疾病进展有关,而性别特异性差异突出了个性化疼痛管理策略的必要性。焦虑和CPP之间的联系强调了在PD疼痛管理中处理心理因素的重要性。进一步研究金刚烷胺在减少RNP方面的益处是必要的,强调了PD患者量身定制疼痛管理策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing pain in Parkinson's disease: types, predictors, and management implications.

Background: Pain impacts quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, yet it is often overlooked. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate pain in PD, particularly focusing on differences between neuropathic pain (NP) and other types.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving PD patients, assessing the prevalence and characteristics of pain. Various scales were employed to evaluate anxiety, depression, and QoL. We investigated associations between pain, demographic, and clinical variables to determine predictors and pain-related factors. Additionally, factors related to NP were explored.

Results: During the study period, a total of 109 patients were examined. Sixteen patients were excluded due to various reasons. The final analysis included 93 patients (34 females and 59 males). Pain was reported by 80.6% of PD patients, with no significant demographic or clinical differences between those with and without pain. However, longer disease duration predicted NP, and musculoskeletal pain was more prevalent in females. Anxiety was common in patients with central parkinsonian pain (CPP). Patients taking amantadine reported less radicular/ neuropathic pain (RNP), suggesting a therapeutic role.

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the high prevalence of pain in PD and its impact on QoL. NP appears to be associated with disease progression, while sex-specific differences highlight the need for personalized pain management strategies. The association between anxiety and CPP emphasizes the importance of addressing psychological factors in PD pain management. Further research on amantadine's benefits in reducing RNP is warranted, emphasizing the importance of tailored pain management strategies for PD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信