视场和体素大小对锥束计算机断层成像的噪比的影响。

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.5624/isd.20240096
Nezaket Ezgi Özer, Ali Canberk Ulusoy, Betul İlhan, Ninita Lindfors, Hayal Boyacıoğlu, Hans-Göran Gröndahl
{"title":"视场和体素大小对锥束计算机断层成像的噪比的影响。","authors":"Nezaket Ezgi Özer, Ali Canberk Ulusoy, Betul İlhan, Ninita Lindfors, Hayal Boyacıoğlu, Hans-Göran Gröndahl","doi":"10.5624/isd.20240096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the impact of the field of view (FOV), voxel size, and exposure parameters on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A SedentexCT phantom was scanned using 3D Accuitomo 170 across 3 FOVs (40×40 mm, 60×60 mm, 80×80 mm). Each FOV had 4 settings for kVp and 3 for mA. Volumes were reconstructed with voxel sizes from 80 to 250 µm. The CNR was calculated using ImageJ (ver. 1.41, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda). Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation coefficients and regression (R<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive correlations were observed in the 40×40 FOV between voxel size, kVp, mA, rotation degree, and CNR. The 60×60 FOV showed positive correlations between mA, kVp, and CNR, while the 80×80 FOV exhibited correlations for voxel size, kVp, and mA. In the 40×40 (R<sup>2</sup>=0.551) and 80×80 (R<sup>2</sup>=0.550) FOVs, mA, kVp, and voxel size influenced CNR. For the 60×60 FOV, mA and kVp were significant contributors (R<sup>2</sup>=0.389). Using a constant 80-µm voxel size, both mA and kVp significantly influenced CNR (R<sup>2</sup>=0.467); neither FOV nor rotation degree had substantial impacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNR increased with higher mA, kVp, and larger voxel sizes for 40×40 and 80×80 FOVs. mA was the most influential factor across all FOVs. Regression models showed significant effects of mA and kVp on CNR with 80-µm voxels, while FOV had no effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"54 4","pages":"362-369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of the field of view and voxel size on the contrast-to-noise ratio in cone-beam computed tomography imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Nezaket Ezgi Özer, Ali Canberk Ulusoy, Betul İlhan, Ninita Lindfors, Hayal Boyacıoğlu, Hans-Göran Gröndahl\",\"doi\":\"10.5624/isd.20240096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the impact of the field of view (FOV), voxel size, and exposure parameters on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A SedentexCT phantom was scanned using 3D Accuitomo 170 across 3 FOVs (40×40 mm, 60×60 mm, 80×80 mm). Each FOV had 4 settings for kVp and 3 for mA. Volumes were reconstructed with voxel sizes from 80 to 250 µm. The CNR was calculated using ImageJ (ver. 1.41, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda). Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation coefficients and regression (R<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive correlations were observed in the 40×40 FOV between voxel size, kVp, mA, rotation degree, and CNR. The 60×60 FOV showed positive correlations between mA, kVp, and CNR, while the 80×80 FOV exhibited correlations for voxel size, kVp, and mA. In the 40×40 (R<sup>2</sup>=0.551) and 80×80 (R<sup>2</sup>=0.550) FOVs, mA, kVp, and voxel size influenced CNR. For the 60×60 FOV, mA and kVp were significant contributors (R<sup>2</sup>=0.389). Using a constant 80-µm voxel size, both mA and kVp significantly influenced CNR (R<sup>2</sup>=0.467); neither FOV nor rotation degree had substantial impacts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNR increased with higher mA, kVp, and larger voxel sizes for 40×40 and 80×80 FOVs. mA was the most influential factor across all FOVs. Regression models showed significant effects of mA and kVp on CNR with 80-µm voxels, while FOV had no effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"54 4\",\"pages\":\"362-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究视场(FOV)、体素大小和曝光参数对锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的噪比(CNR)的影响。材料和方法:使用3D Accuitomo 170在3个fov (40×40 mm, 60×60 mm, 80×80 mm)上扫描SedentexCT假体。每个FOV有4个kVp和3个mA设置。体素大小从80到250µm重建体。使用ImageJ (ver.)计算CNR。1.41,美国国立卫生研究院,贝塞斯达)。统计分析包括Pearson相关系数和回归(R2)。结果:40×40视场与体素大小、kVp、mA、旋转度、CNR呈正相关。60×60 FOV与mA、kVp和CNR呈正相关,而80×80 FOV与体素大小、kVp和mA呈正相关。在40×40 (R2=0.551)和80×80 (R2=0.550)中,fov、mA、kVp和体素大小影响CNR。对于60×60视场,mA和kVp是显著影响因子(R2=0.389)。当体素大小为80µm时,mA和kVp均显著影响CNR (R2=0.467);视场和旋转度都没有实质性的影响。结论:40×40和80×80 fov的CNR随mA、kVp和体素大小的增加而增加。mA是所有fov中影响最大的因素。回归模型显示,mA和kVp对80µm体素的CNR有显著影响,而FOV没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of the field of view and voxel size on the contrast-to-noise ratio in cone-beam computed tomography imaging.

Purpose: This study investigated the impact of the field of view (FOV), voxel size, and exposure parameters on the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods: A SedentexCT phantom was scanned using 3D Accuitomo 170 across 3 FOVs (40×40 mm, 60×60 mm, 80×80 mm). Each FOV had 4 settings for kVp and 3 for mA. Volumes were reconstructed with voxel sizes from 80 to 250 µm. The CNR was calculated using ImageJ (ver. 1.41, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda). Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation coefficients and regression (R2).

Results: Positive correlations were observed in the 40×40 FOV between voxel size, kVp, mA, rotation degree, and CNR. The 60×60 FOV showed positive correlations between mA, kVp, and CNR, while the 80×80 FOV exhibited correlations for voxel size, kVp, and mA. In the 40×40 (R2=0.551) and 80×80 (R2=0.550) FOVs, mA, kVp, and voxel size influenced CNR. For the 60×60 FOV, mA and kVp were significant contributors (R2=0.389). Using a constant 80-µm voxel size, both mA and kVp significantly influenced CNR (R2=0.467); neither FOV nor rotation degree had substantial impacts.

Conclusion: CNR increased with higher mA, kVp, and larger voxel sizes for 40×40 and 80×80 FOVs. mA was the most influential factor across all FOVs. Regression models showed significant effects of mA and kVp on CNR with 80-µm voxels, while FOV had no effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信