单件式窄径种植体固定义肢康复的长期临床研究:回顾性研究。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jong-Hee Kim, Jung Hyun Nam, Na-Hee Chang, Yang-Jin Yi
{"title":"单件式窄径种植体固定义肢康复的长期临床研究:回顾性研究。","authors":"Jong-Hee Kim, Jung Hyun Nam, Na-Hee Chang, Yang-Jin Yi","doi":"10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.6.343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of one-piece narrow-diameter implants (NDIs), with diameters of 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm, and to investigate the factors that affect marginal bone loss (MBL) around these implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study analyzed patients who were treated with 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm MS SA narrow ridge implants (Osstem Implant) at the Section of Dentistry in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2007 to 2022 and had more than 6 years of follow-up data. MBL was measured using periapical radiographs. Age, sex, implant location, timing of implant placement and loading, placement depth, guided bone regeneration (GBR), fixture diameter, type of implant prosthesis, and opposing dentition type were investigated in relation to MBL. The implant survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with MBL. All analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.1.0 for Microsoft Windows; R Foundation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five patients with 40 NDIs were included in this study. The mean observation period after implant function was 10.5 years (range, 6.1 to 14.0 years), and the survival rate of the NDIs was 95.1% at the implant level and 96.0% at the patient level. The average amount of MBL was 0.44±0.57 mm. The only factor that showed a significant association with MBL was the presence of GBR (<i>P</i>=0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of a retrospective evaluation, NDIs have demonstrated optimal clinical outcomes over a long period in areas in which anatomical structures are limited. MBL around the NDI also showed clinically acceptable results, and a correlation with MBL was observed in cases in which a bone graft was performed. Further studies with a larger number of implants over extended periods are needed in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":51711,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons","volume":"50 6","pages":"343-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term clinical study of fixed prosthetic rehabilitation using one-piece narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Jong-Hee Kim, Jung Hyun Nam, Na-Hee Chang, Yang-Jin Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.6.343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of one-piece narrow-diameter implants (NDIs), with diameters of 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm, and to investigate the factors that affect marginal bone loss (MBL) around these implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study analyzed patients who were treated with 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm MS SA narrow ridge implants (Osstem Implant) at the Section of Dentistry in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2007 to 2022 and had more than 6 years of follow-up data. MBL was measured using periapical radiographs. Age, sex, implant location, timing of implant placement and loading, placement depth, guided bone regeneration (GBR), fixture diameter, type of implant prosthesis, and opposing dentition type were investigated in relation to MBL. The implant survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with MBL. All analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.1.0 for Microsoft Windows; R Foundation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five patients with 40 NDIs were included in this study. The mean observation period after implant function was 10.5 years (range, 6.1 to 14.0 years), and the survival rate of the NDIs was 95.1% at the implant level and 96.0% at the patient level. The average amount of MBL was 0.44±0.57 mm. The only factor that showed a significant association with MBL was the presence of GBR (<i>P</i>=0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of a retrospective evaluation, NDIs have demonstrated optimal clinical outcomes over a long period in areas in which anatomical structures are limited. MBL around the NDI also showed clinically acceptable results, and a correlation with MBL was observed in cases in which a bone graft was performed. Further studies with a larger number of implants over extended periods are needed in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"50 6\",\"pages\":\"343-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.6.343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.6.343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估直径为2.5 mm和3.0 mm的一件式窄径种植体(ndi)的长期临床效果,并探讨影响种植体周围边缘骨丢失(MBL)的因素。材料与方法:本研究分析了2007年至2022年在首尔大学盆唐医院牙科科接受2.5 mm和3.0 mm MS SA窄嵴种植体(Osstem Implant)治疗的患者,并进行了6年多的随访资料。MBL采用根尖周围x线片测量。研究了年龄、性别、种植体位置、种植体放置和负载的时间、放置深度、引导骨再生(GBR)、固定装置直径、种植体假体类型和对牙列类型与MBL的关系。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析种植体存活率,并采用单因素和多因素logistic回归模型确定与MBL相关的因素。所有分析均使用R软件(Microsoft Windows版本4.1.0;R基金会)。结果:本研究纳入25例40例ndi患者。种植体功能恢复后的平均观察期为10.5年(6.1 ~ 14.0年),ndi在种植体水平上的生存率为95.1%,在患者水平上的生存率为96.0%。MBL平均为0.44±0.57 mm。唯一显示与MBL显著相关的因素是GBR的存在(P=0.046)。结论:在回顾性评估的限制下,ndi在解剖结构受限的区域长期表现出最佳的临床结果。NDI周围的MBL也显示出临床可接受的结果,并且在进行骨移植的病例中观察到与MBL的相关性。未来需要更多的植入物和更长时间的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term clinical study of fixed prosthetic rehabilitation using one-piece narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of one-piece narrow-diameter implants (NDIs), with diameters of 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm, and to investigate the factors that affect marginal bone loss (MBL) around these implants.

Materials and methods: This study analyzed patients who were treated with 2.5 mm and 3.0 mm MS SA narrow ridge implants (Osstem Implant) at the Section of Dentistry in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2007 to 2022 and had more than 6 years of follow-up data. MBL was measured using periapical radiographs. Age, sex, implant location, timing of implant placement and loading, placement depth, guided bone regeneration (GBR), fixture diameter, type of implant prosthesis, and opposing dentition type were investigated in relation to MBL. The implant survival rate was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with MBL. All analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.1.0 for Microsoft Windows; R Foundation).

Results: Twenty-five patients with 40 NDIs were included in this study. The mean observation period after implant function was 10.5 years (range, 6.1 to 14.0 years), and the survival rate of the NDIs was 95.1% at the implant level and 96.0% at the patient level. The average amount of MBL was 0.44±0.57 mm. The only factor that showed a significant association with MBL was the presence of GBR (P=0.046).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of a retrospective evaluation, NDIs have demonstrated optimal clinical outcomes over a long period in areas in which anatomical structures are limited. MBL around the NDI also showed clinically acceptable results, and a correlation with MBL was observed in cases in which a bone graft was performed. Further studies with a larger number of implants over extended periods are needed in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg) is the official journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. This bimonthly journal offers high-quality original articles, case series study, case reports, collective or current reviews, technical notes, brief communications or correspondences, and others related to regenerative medicine, dentoalveolar surgery, dental implant surgery, head and neck cancer, aesthetic facial surgery/orthognathic surgery, facial injuries, temporomandibular joint disorders, orofacial disease, and oral pathology. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg is of interest to oral and maxillofacial surgeons and dental practitioners as well as others who are interested in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信