在波兰,内镜消融治疗发育不良Barrett食管的安全性、有效性和变化趋势:一项长期多中心回顾性分析。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marcin Romanczyk, Robert Klimkowski, Michal Kukla, Nastazja D Pilonis, Tomasz Romanczyk, Magda Gorecka, Magdalena Lesinska, Ewa Wronska, Jaroslaw Regula, Michal F Kaminski, Wladyslaw Januszewicz
{"title":"在波兰,内镜消融治疗发育不良Barrett食管的安全性、有效性和变化趋势:一项长期多中心回顾性分析。","authors":"Marcin Romanczyk, Robert Klimkowski, Michal Kukla, Nastazja D Pilonis, Tomasz Romanczyk, Magda Gorecka, Magdalena Lesinska, Ewa Wronska, Jaroslaw Regula, Michal F Kaminski, Wladyslaw Januszewicz","doi":"10.20452/pamw.16912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic ablation is the mainstay of treatment for dysplastic Barrett esophagus (BE), of which radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and argon plasma coagulation (APC) are the most widely available options.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to analyze the safety and outcomes of endoscopic ablation for BE at the Polish centers offering this procedure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 3 high‑volume endoscopy centers between 2002 and 2024. We included adult patients with confirmed BE who received at least 1 ablation session with either conventional / hybrid APC (APC/h‑APC) or RFA, followed by at least 1 endoscopic follow‑up. The outcomes included the rate of complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CR‑IM) and dysplasia (CR‑D), and adverse event (AE) rate. Risk factors for treatment failure were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed data from 191 patients, of which 160 were included (mean [SD] age, 59.4 [10.8] years; 79.4% men). The overall CR‑IM and CR‑D rates were 80% and 93.8%, respectively. We reported 49 minor AEs (30.6%), and 9 major AEs (5.6%), including 7 esophageal strictures (4.4%). In the early 2000s, APC was the only available ablation modality. However, since 2008, it has been gradually replaced by RFA. Notably, RFA was used for more severe BE cases and carried a higher risk of failed treatment than APC/h‑APC (odds ratio [OR], 7.48; P = 0.001). Other risk factors for treatment failure included the BE length (OR, 1.3; P = 0.002) and diabetes (OR, 7.48; P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic ablation for BE is safely and effectively provided in Poland at a few expert centers. Patients with diabetes and long‑segment BE are at an increased risk for treatment failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":49680,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, efficacy, and changing trends in endoscopic ablation for dysplastic Barrett esophagus in Poland: a long-term multicenter retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Romanczyk, Robert Klimkowski, Michal Kukla, Nastazja D Pilonis, Tomasz Romanczyk, Magda Gorecka, Magdalena Lesinska, Ewa Wronska, Jaroslaw Regula, Michal F Kaminski, Wladyslaw Januszewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/pamw.16912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic ablation is the mainstay of treatment for dysplastic Barrett esophagus (BE), of which radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and argon plasma coagulation (APC) are the most widely available options.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to analyze the safety and outcomes of endoscopic ablation for BE at the Polish centers offering this procedure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 3 high‑volume endoscopy centers between 2002 and 2024. We included adult patients with confirmed BE who received at least 1 ablation session with either conventional / hybrid APC (APC/h‑APC) or RFA, followed by at least 1 endoscopic follow‑up. The outcomes included the rate of complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CR‑IM) and dysplasia (CR‑D), and adverse event (AE) rate. Risk factors for treatment failure were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed data from 191 patients, of which 160 were included (mean [SD] age, 59.4 [10.8] years; 79.4% men). The overall CR‑IM and CR‑D rates were 80% and 93.8%, respectively. We reported 49 minor AEs (30.6%), and 9 major AEs (5.6%), including 7 esophageal strictures (4.4%). In the early 2000s, APC was the only available ablation modality. However, since 2008, it has been gradually replaced by RFA. Notably, RFA was used for more severe BE cases and carried a higher risk of failed treatment than APC/h‑APC (odds ratio [OR], 7.48; P = 0.001). Other risk factors for treatment failure included the BE length (OR, 1.3; P = 0.002) and diabetes (OR, 7.48; P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic ablation for BE is safely and effectively provided in Poland at a few expert centers. Patients with diabetes and long‑segment BE are at an increased risk for treatment failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej-Polish Archives of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内镜消融是治疗发育不良巴雷特食管(BE)的主要方法,其中射频消融(RFA)和氩等离子凝固(APC)是最广泛的选择。目的:我们旨在分析波兰中心内窥镜消融治疗BE的安全性和结果。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2002-2024年间三个大容量内窥镜检查单位的数据。我们纳入了接受≥1次常规/混合APC (APC/h-APC)或RFA消融治疗的确诊BE的成年患者,随后进行≥1次内镜随访。结果包括:肠化生(CR-IM)和非典型增生(CR-D)完全缓解率和不良事件发生率(ae)。采用多变量logistic回归模型分析治疗失败的危险因素。结果:我们分析了191例患者的资料,其中160例纳入研究,平均年龄59.4[10.8]岁;79.4%的男性)。总体而言,CR-IM和CR-D率分别为80.0%和93.8%。我们报告了49例轻微不良事件(30.6%)和9例严重不良事件(5.6%),包括7例食管狭窄(4.4%)。在21世纪初,APC是唯一可用的消融方式。然而,自2008年以来,它已逐渐被RFA所取代。值得注意的是,RFA用于更严重的BE病例,治疗失败的风险高于APC/h-APC(优势比[OR] 7.48,P=0.001)。导致治疗失败的其他危险因素包括BE长度(OR 1.3,P=0.002)和糖尿病(OR 7.48,P)。结论:在波兰,少数专家中心安全有效地提供了内镜下BE消融治疗。糖尿病和长段BE患者治疗失败的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety, efficacy, and changing trends in endoscopic ablation for dysplastic Barrett esophagus in Poland: a long-term multicenter retrospective analysis.

Introduction: Endoscopic ablation is the mainstay of treatment for dysplastic Barrett esophagus (BE), of which radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and argon plasma coagulation (APC) are the most widely available options.

Objectives: We aimed to analyze the safety and outcomes of endoscopic ablation for BE at the Polish centers offering this procedure.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 3 high‑volume endoscopy centers between 2002 and 2024. We included adult patients with confirmed BE who received at least 1 ablation session with either conventional / hybrid APC (APC/h‑APC) or RFA, followed by at least 1 endoscopic follow‑up. The outcomes included the rate of complete remission of intestinal metaplasia (CR‑IM) and dysplasia (CR‑D), and adverse event (AE) rate. Risk factors for treatment failure were analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model.

Results: We analyzed data from 191 patients, of which 160 were included (mean [SD] age, 59.4 [10.8] years; 79.4% men). The overall CR‑IM and CR‑D rates were 80% and 93.8%, respectively. We reported 49 minor AEs (30.6%), and 9 major AEs (5.6%), including 7 esophageal strictures (4.4%). In the early 2000s, APC was the only available ablation modality. However, since 2008, it has been gradually replaced by RFA. Notably, RFA was used for more severe BE cases and carried a higher risk of failed treatment than APC/h‑APC (odds ratio [OR], 7.48; P = 0.001). Other risk factors for treatment failure included the BE length (OR, 1.3; P = 0.002) and diabetes (OR, 7.48; P <0.001).

Conclusions: Endoscopic ablation for BE is safely and effectively provided in Poland at a few expert centers. Patients with diabetes and long‑segment BE are at an increased risk for treatment failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Archives of Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed periodical issued monthly in English as an official journal of the Polish Society of Internal Medicine. The journal is designed to publish articles related to all aspects of internal medicine, both clinical and basic science, provided they have practical implications. Polish Archives of Internal Medicine appears monthly in both print and online versions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信