国家级电子烟预防运动对青少年信仰和行为的影响

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Allison M Glasser, Valerie S Harder, Julia C West, Maria L Roemhildt, Lisa Osbahr, Rhonda Williams, Andrea C Villanti
{"title":"国家级电子烟预防运动对青少年信仰和行为的影响","authors":"Allison M Glasser, Valerie S Harder, Julia C West, Maria L Roemhildt, Lisa Osbahr, Rhonda Williams, Andrea C Villanti","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2446741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaping prevention media campaigns have promising effects on harm perceptions but have yet to demonstrate impacts on vaping behaviors in young people. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of Vermont's vaping prevention campaign (Unhyped) on vaping-related beliefs and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data come from Waves 5 (Winter 2020) and 9 (Winter 2021) (<i>n</i> = 433) of the Policy and Communication Evaluation Vermont study, a longitudinal online cohort study of adolescents and young adults ages 12-25. Analyses examined associations between awareness of Unhyped in 2020 and outcomes in 2020 and 2021. Primary analyses compared participants aged 12-17 (campaign target) who reported awareness of Unhyped to propensity score-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020, more adolescents aware of the Unhyped campaign perceived great risk from weekly vaping compared with matched controls (49.3% vs. 24.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.019). Adolescents aware of Unhyped in 2020 were also less likely than matched controls to report willingness to try a vapor product in the next year (15.8% vs. 40.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.048) or use one if offered by a friend (21.4% vs. 49.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.031) in 2021. There was no relationship between brand awareness and vaping behaviors in 2020 or 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there were no effects of awareness of Vermont's Unhyped campaign on vaping behaviors, the campaign was effective in altering short-term risk perceptions and reducing susceptibility to vape in adolescents one year later.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"659-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a State-Level Vaping Prevention Campaign on Beliefs and Behaviors in Young People.\",\"authors\":\"Allison M Glasser, Valerie S Harder, Julia C West, Maria L Roemhildt, Lisa Osbahr, Rhonda Williams, Andrea C Villanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2024.2446741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaping prevention media campaigns have promising effects on harm perceptions but have yet to demonstrate impacts on vaping behaviors in young people. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of Vermont's vaping prevention campaign (Unhyped) on vaping-related beliefs and behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data come from Waves 5 (Winter 2020) and 9 (Winter 2021) (<i>n</i> = 433) of the Policy and Communication Evaluation Vermont study, a longitudinal online cohort study of adolescents and young adults ages 12-25. Analyses examined associations between awareness of Unhyped in 2020 and outcomes in 2020 and 2021. Primary analyses compared participants aged 12-17 (campaign target) who reported awareness of Unhyped to propensity score-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2020, more adolescents aware of the Unhyped campaign perceived great risk from weekly vaping compared with matched controls (49.3% vs. 24.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.019). Adolescents aware of Unhyped in 2020 were also less likely than matched controls to report willingness to try a vapor product in the next year (15.8% vs. 40.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.048) or use one if offered by a friend (21.4% vs. 49.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.031) in 2021. There was no relationship between brand awareness and vaping behaviors in 2020 or 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there were no effects of awareness of Vermont's Unhyped campaign on vaping behaviors, the campaign was effective in altering short-term risk perceptions and reducing susceptibility to vape in adolescents one year later.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"659-668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2446741\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2446741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预防电子烟的媒体宣传活动对危害认知有很大的影响,但尚未证明对年轻人的电子烟行为有影响。这项研究的目的是评估佛蒙特州的电子烟预防运动(Unhyped)对电子烟相关信仰和行为的影响。方法:数据来自佛蒙特州政策与沟通评估研究的第5波(2020年冬季)和第9波(2021年冬季)(n = 433),这是一项针对12-25岁青少年和年轻人的纵向在线队列研究。分析调查了2020年对Unhyped的认识与2020年和2021年的结果之间的关系。初步分析比较了12-17岁(活动目标)的参与者,他们报告了对Unhyped的认识,并倾向于得分匹配的控制。结果:在2020年,与对照组相比,更多意识到Unhyped运动的青少年认为每周吸电子烟的风险很大(49.3% vs. 24.3%;p = 0.019)。在2020年意识到Unhyped的青少年也不太可能比对照组更愿意在明年尝试蒸汽产品(15.8%对40.1%;P = 0.048)或使用朋友提供的服务(21.4% vs 49.1%;P = 0.031)。在2020年或2021年,品牌知名度和电子烟行为之间没有关系。结论:尽管意识到佛蒙特州的“无炒作”运动对电子烟行为没有影响,但该运动在一年后改变青少年的短期风险认知和降低对电子烟的易感性方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of a State-Level Vaping Prevention Campaign on Beliefs and Behaviors in Young People.

Background: Vaping prevention media campaigns have promising effects on harm perceptions but have yet to demonstrate impacts on vaping behaviors in young people. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of Vermont's vaping prevention campaign (Unhyped) on vaping-related beliefs and behaviors.

Methods: Data come from Waves 5 (Winter 2020) and 9 (Winter 2021) (n = 433) of the Policy and Communication Evaluation Vermont study, a longitudinal online cohort study of adolescents and young adults ages 12-25. Analyses examined associations between awareness of Unhyped in 2020 and outcomes in 2020 and 2021. Primary analyses compared participants aged 12-17 (campaign target) who reported awareness of Unhyped to propensity score-matched controls.

Results: In 2020, more adolescents aware of the Unhyped campaign perceived great risk from weekly vaping compared with matched controls (49.3% vs. 24.3%; p = 0.019). Adolescents aware of Unhyped in 2020 were also less likely than matched controls to report willingness to try a vapor product in the next year (15.8% vs. 40.1%; p = 0.048) or use one if offered by a friend (21.4% vs. 49.1%; p = 0.031) in 2021. There was no relationship between brand awareness and vaping behaviors in 2020 or 2021.

Conclusions: Although there were no effects of awareness of Vermont's Unhyped campaign on vaping behaviors, the campaign was effective in altering short-term risk perceptions and reducing susceptibility to vape in adolescents one year later.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信