创伤性臂丛神经损伤后重返工作:对全球不同地区经验的选择性文献综述。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Veronika Hofmann, Maryam Maleki, Hazel Brown, Tom Quick, Madjid Samii, Lukas Rasulić, Peter P Pott, Urs Schneider
{"title":"创伤性臂丛神经损伤后重返工作:对全球不同地区经验的选择性文献综述。","authors":"Veronika Hofmann, Maryam Maleki, Hazel Brown, Tom Quick, Madjid Samii, Lukas Rasulić, Peter P Pott, Urs Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Each year, thousands of individuals, particularly young adults, experience traumatic brachial plexus injuries (TBPIs), leading to significant limitations, permanent disabilities, reduced quality of life, and infrequent return to work. Current treatments and assistive devices have shown limited success, resulting in considerable social and economic challenges for patients. Given the devastating nature of this injury and the lack of literature on return to work rates among young adults, this study aims to determine the percentage of individuals reintegrating into work after a TBPI. Furthermore, it compares outcomes across different health care systems, including those in Germany, Serbia, and the United Kingdom. This dual approach has been selected to investigate the influence of various factors on the outcomes associated with returning to work after TBPI. Preliminary findings indicate that approximately 60% of patients with TBPI return to work, although most require a change in their occupational roles. Despite variations in health care systems and governmental support, the reintegration of patients with TBPI into work and society remains a critical and universal challenge. This comparative analysis highlights disparities in TBPI research and outcomes, providing valuable insights for future improvements in patient care and support mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123632"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reintegration into Work after Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Selective Literature Review of Experiences from Various Global Regions.\",\"authors\":\"Veronika Hofmann, Maryam Maleki, Hazel Brown, Tom Quick, Madjid Samii, Lukas Rasulić, Peter P Pott, Urs Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Each year, thousands of individuals, particularly young adults, experience traumatic brachial plexus injuries (TBPIs), leading to significant limitations, permanent disabilities, reduced quality of life, and infrequent return to work. Current treatments and assistive devices have shown limited success, resulting in considerable social and economic challenges for patients. Given the devastating nature of this injury and the lack of literature on return to work rates among young adults, this study aims to determine the percentage of individuals reintegrating into work after a TBPI. Furthermore, it compares outcomes across different health care systems, including those in Germany, Serbia, and the United Kingdom. This dual approach has been selected to investigate the influence of various factors on the outcomes associated with returning to work after TBPI. Preliminary findings indicate that approximately 60% of patients with TBPI return to work, although most require a change in their occupational roles. Despite variations in health care systems and governmental support, the reintegration of patients with TBPI into work and society remains a critical and universal challenge. This comparative analysis highlights disparities in TBPI research and outcomes, providing valuable insights for future improvements in patient care and support mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"123632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123632\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123632","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每年,成千上万的人,特别是年轻人,遭受创伤性臂丛神经损伤(TBPIs),导致严重的限制,永久性残疾,生活质量下降,并且很少重返工作岗位。目前的治疗方法和辅助装置取得了有限的成功,给患者带来了相当大的社会和经济挑战。鉴于这种伤害的破坏性,以及缺乏关于年轻人重返工作岗位率的文献,本研究旨在确定TBPI后个人重新融入工作的百分比。此外,它将比较不同医疗保健系统的结果,包括德国、塞尔维亚和英国的医疗保健系统。选择这种双重方法来调查各种因素对TBPI后重返工作相关结果的影响。初步研究结果表明,大约60%的TBPI患者重返工作岗位,尽管大多数患者需要改变职业角色。尽管医疗系统和政府支持各不相同,TBPI患者重新融入工作和社会仍然是一个关键和普遍的挑战。这一比较分析突出了TBPI研究和结果的差异,为未来患者护理和支持机制的改进提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reintegration into Work after Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Selective Literature Review of Experiences from Various Global Regions.

Each year, thousands of individuals, particularly young adults, experience traumatic brachial plexus injuries (TBPIs), leading to significant limitations, permanent disabilities, reduced quality of life, and infrequent return to work. Current treatments and assistive devices have shown limited success, resulting in considerable social and economic challenges for patients. Given the devastating nature of this injury and the lack of literature on return to work rates among young adults, this study aims to determine the percentage of individuals reintegrating into work after a TBPI. Furthermore, it compares outcomes across different health care systems, including those in Germany, Serbia, and the United Kingdom. This dual approach has been selected to investigate the influence of various factors on the outcomes associated with returning to work after TBPI. Preliminary findings indicate that approximately 60% of patients with TBPI return to work, although most require a change in their occupational roles. Despite variations in health care systems and governmental support, the reintegration of patients with TBPI into work and society remains a critical and universal challenge. This comparative analysis highlights disparities in TBPI research and outcomes, providing valuable insights for future improvements in patient care and support mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信