自动锥形束计算机断层扫描(Cone Beam Computed Tomography)分割与罕见病相关或不相关的多颗受撞击牙齿:评估四种基于深度学习的方法。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Eloi Sinard, Laurent Gajny, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Rufino Felizardo, Gauthier Dot
{"title":"自动锥形束计算机断层扫描(Cone Beam Computed Tomography)分割与罕见病相关或不相关的多颗受撞击牙齿:评估四种基于深度学习的方法。","authors":"Eloi Sinard, Laurent Gajny, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Rufino Felizardo, Gauthier Dot","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the accuracy of three commercially available and one open-source deep learning (DL) solutions for automatic tooth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with multiple dental impactions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients (20 CBCT scans) were selected from a retrospective cohort of individuals with multiple dental impactions. For each CBCT scan, one reference segmentation and four DL segmentations of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were obtained. Reference segmentations were generated by experts using a semi-automatic process. DL segmentations were automatically generated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of each DL segmentation were performed by comparing it with expert-generated segmentation. The quantitative metrics used were Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the normalized surface distance (NSD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients had an average of 12 retained teeth, with 12 of them diagnosed with a rare disease. DSC values ranged from 88.5% ± 3.2% to 95.6% ± 1.2%, and NSD values ranged from 95.3% ± 2.7% to 97.4% ± 6.5%. The number of completely unsegmented teeth ranged from 1 (0.1%) to 41 (6.0%). Two solutions (Diagnocat and DentalSegmentator) outperformed the others across all tested parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the tested methods showed a mean NSD of approximately 95%, proving their overall efficiency for tooth segmentation. The accuracy of the methods varied among the four tested solutions owing to the presence of impacted teeth in our CBCT scans. DL solutions are evolving rapidly, and their future performance cannot be predicted based on our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Cone Beam Computed Tomography Segmentation of Multiple Impacted Teeth With or Without Association to Rare Diseases: Evaluation of Four Deep Learning-Based Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Eloi Sinard, Laurent Gajny, Muriel de La Dure-Molla, Rufino Felizardo, Gauthier Dot\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ocr.12890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the accuracy of three commercially available and one open-source deep learning (DL) solutions for automatic tooth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with multiple dental impactions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients (20 CBCT scans) were selected from a retrospective cohort of individuals with multiple dental impactions. For each CBCT scan, one reference segmentation and four DL segmentations of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were obtained. Reference segmentations were generated by experts using a semi-automatic process. DL segmentations were automatically generated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of each DL segmentation were performed by comparing it with expert-generated segmentation. The quantitative metrics used were Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the normalized surface distance (NSD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients had an average of 12 retained teeth, with 12 of them diagnosed with a rare disease. DSC values ranged from 88.5% ± 3.2% to 95.6% ± 1.2%, and NSD values ranged from 95.3% ± 2.7% to 97.4% ± 6.5%. The number of completely unsegmented teeth ranged from 1 (0.1%) to 41 (6.0%). Two solutions (Diagnocat and DentalSegmentator) outperformed the others across all tested parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the tested methods showed a mean NSD of approximately 95%, proving their overall efficiency for tooth segmentation. The accuracy of the methods varied among the four tested solutions owing to the presence of impacted teeth in our CBCT scans. DL solutions are evolving rapidly, and their future performance cannot be predicted based on our results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12890\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估三种市售和一种开源深度学习(DL)解决方案在多牙嵌套患者锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像中自动分割牙齿的准确性。材料和方法:20例患者(20次CBCT扫描)从多牙嵌塞患者的回顾性队列中选择。每次CBCT扫描,获得上颌和下颌牙的1个参考分割和4个DL分割。参考分割由专家使用半自动过程生成。根据制造商的说明自动生成DL分割。通过将每个DL分割与专家生成的分割进行比较,对每个DL分割进行定量和定性评估。定量指标采用Dice相似系数(DSC)和归一化表面距离(NSD)。结果:患者平均保留牙12颗,其中12颗诊断为罕见病。DSC值为88.5%±3.2% ~ 95.6%±1.2%,NSD值为95.3%±2.7% ~ 97.4%±6.5%。完全未裂牙数为1(0.1%)~ 41(6.0%)。两个解决方案(Diagnocat和DentalSegmentator)在所有测试参数上都优于其他解决方案。结论:所有测试方法的平均NSD约为95%,证明了它们对牙齿分割的总体效率。由于在我们的CBCT扫描中存在阻生牙齿,因此方法的准确性在四种测试溶液中有所不同。深度学习解决方案正在迅速发展,它们的未来性能无法根据我们的结果进行预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Cone Beam Computed Tomography Segmentation of Multiple Impacted Teeth With or Without Association to Rare Diseases: Evaluation of Four Deep Learning-Based Methods.

Objective: To assess the accuracy of three commercially available and one open-source deep learning (DL) solutions for automatic tooth segmentation in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of patients with multiple dental impactions.

Materials and methods: Twenty patients (20 CBCT scans) were selected from a retrospective cohort of individuals with multiple dental impactions. For each CBCT scan, one reference segmentation and four DL segmentations of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were obtained. Reference segmentations were generated by experts using a semi-automatic process. DL segmentations were automatically generated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of each DL segmentation were performed by comparing it with expert-generated segmentation. The quantitative metrics used were Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the normalized surface distance (NSD).

Results: The patients had an average of 12 retained teeth, with 12 of them diagnosed with a rare disease. DSC values ranged from 88.5% ± 3.2% to 95.6% ± 1.2%, and NSD values ranged from 95.3% ± 2.7% to 97.4% ± 6.5%. The number of completely unsegmented teeth ranged from 1 (0.1%) to 41 (6.0%). Two solutions (Diagnocat and DentalSegmentator) outperformed the others across all tested parameters.

Conclusion: All the tested methods showed a mean NSD of approximately 95%, proving their overall efficiency for tooth segmentation. The accuracy of the methods varied among the four tested solutions owing to the presence of impacted teeth in our CBCT scans. DL solutions are evolving rapidly, and their future performance cannot be predicted based on our results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信