比较钛和不锈钢固位体对下门牙稳定性、牙周健康和固位体存活的影响:初步研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Melis Seki Yurdakul, Pamir Meriç
{"title":"比较钛和不锈钢固位体对下门牙稳定性、牙周健康和固位体存活的影响:初步研究。","authors":"Melis Seki Yurdakul, Pamir Meriç","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the impact of titanium and stainless steel (SS) retainer wires on lower incisor stability and periodontal health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients between the ages of 14.1 and 29.5 years were recruited for the study. The impact of 0.027x0.011-inch rectangular titanium dead-soft wire retainers was compared with that of 0.0215-inch six-stranded SS wire retainers. The retainers were bonded to the mandibular arch, and 3D models were evaluated after completion of the orthodontic treatment (T1), at the third month (T2), and at the sixth month (T3). Little's irregularity index (LII), the intercanine width, the pocket depth, the plaque index, bleeding on probing, and retainer survival were analyzed. The generalized linear model method was used to compare scores on LII, the intercanine width, the pocket depth, and plaque index values. Cochran's Q test was used to compare intragroup bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase was found in the irregularity index parameter according to time (p=0.004) but no statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of the LII according to material and time (p=0.826). No significant difference was found in intercanine width parameters between the groups according to material and time (p=0.977). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pocket depth and plaque index scores, according to material and time. No retainer failure was observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both retainer wires offer successful results in terms of stability parameters and periodontal parameters after six months.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"37 4","pages":"232-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Impact of Titanium and Stainless Steel Retainers on Lower Incisor Stability, Periodontal Health, and Retainer Survival: A Preliminary Study.\",\"authors\":\"Melis Seki Yurdakul, Pamir Meriç\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the impact of titanium and stainless steel (SS) retainer wires on lower incisor stability and periodontal health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty patients between the ages of 14.1 and 29.5 years were recruited for the study. The impact of 0.027x0.011-inch rectangular titanium dead-soft wire retainers was compared with that of 0.0215-inch six-stranded SS wire retainers. The retainers were bonded to the mandibular arch, and 3D models were evaluated after completion of the orthodontic treatment (T1), at the third month (T2), and at the sixth month (T3). Little's irregularity index (LII), the intercanine width, the pocket depth, the plaque index, bleeding on probing, and retainer survival were analyzed. The generalized linear model method was used to compare scores on LII, the intercanine width, the pocket depth, and plaque index values. Cochran's Q test was used to compare intragroup bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant increase was found in the irregularity index parameter according to time (p=0.004) but no statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of the LII according to material and time (p=0.826). No significant difference was found in intercanine width parameters between the groups according to material and time (p=0.977). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pocket depth and plaque index scores, according to material and time. No retainer failure was observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both retainer wires offer successful results in terms of stability parameters and periodontal parameters after six months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"37 4\",\"pages\":\"232-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2024.2023.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较钛金属和不锈钢金属固位丝对下切牙稳定性和牙周健康的影响。方法:50例患者,年龄14.1 ~ 29.5岁。比较0.027x0.011英寸矩形钛质死软固定器与0.0215英寸六股SS固定器的影响。固位体与下颌弓结合,在正畸治疗完成后(T1)、第3个月(T2)和第6个月(T3)评估3D模型。分析利特氏不规则指数(LII)、齿间宽度、牙袋深度、牙菌斑指数、探诊出血及固位器存活率。采用广义线性模型方法比较LII评分、齿间宽度、牙袋深度和牙菌斑指标值。采用科克伦Q检验比较组内出血情况。结果:按时间分组的不规则性指标参数显著升高(p=0.004),按材料分组和按时间分组的LII参数差异无统计学意义(p=0.826)。不同材料、不同时间组间犬齿间宽度参数差异无统计学意义(p=0.977)。根据材料和时间的不同,两组在牙袋深度和斑块指数评分方面没有统计学上的显著差异。两组均未见固位体失效。结论:6个月后,两种固位器在稳定性指标和牙周指标方面均取得了良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Impact of Titanium and Stainless Steel Retainers on Lower Incisor Stability, Periodontal Health, and Retainer Survival: A Preliminary Study.

Objective: This study aims to compare the impact of titanium and stainless steel (SS) retainer wires on lower incisor stability and periodontal health.

Methods: Fifty patients between the ages of 14.1 and 29.5 years were recruited for the study. The impact of 0.027x0.011-inch rectangular titanium dead-soft wire retainers was compared with that of 0.0215-inch six-stranded SS wire retainers. The retainers were bonded to the mandibular arch, and 3D models were evaluated after completion of the orthodontic treatment (T1), at the third month (T2), and at the sixth month (T3). Little's irregularity index (LII), the intercanine width, the pocket depth, the plaque index, bleeding on probing, and retainer survival were analyzed. The generalized linear model method was used to compare scores on LII, the intercanine width, the pocket depth, and plaque index values. Cochran's Q test was used to compare intragroup bleeding.

Results: A significant increase was found in the irregularity index parameter according to time (p=0.004) but no statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of the LII according to material and time (p=0.826). No significant difference was found in intercanine width parameters between the groups according to material and time (p=0.977). No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of pocket depth and plaque index scores, according to material and time. No retainer failure was observed in either group.

Conclusion: Both retainer wires offer successful results in terms of stability parameters and periodontal parameters after six months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信