腺相关病毒载体血清2型介导基因治疗中枢神经系统CLN2疾病的20年生存率分析

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Human gene therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1089/hum.2024.182
Dolan Sondhi, Stephen M Kaminsky, Jonathan B Rosenberg, Mahboubeh R Rostami, Neil R Hackett, Ronald G Crystal
{"title":"腺相关病毒载体血清2型介导基因治疗中枢神经系统CLN2疾病的20年生存率分析","authors":"Dolan Sondhi, Stephen M Kaminsky, Jonathan B Rosenberg, Mahboubeh R Rostami, Neil R Hackett, Ronald G Crystal","doi":"10.1089/hum.2024.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CLN2 disease (late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis) is an autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disease that results from loss of function mutations in the <i>CLN2</i> gene, which encodes tripeptidyl peptidase 1. It affects the central nervous system (CNS) with progressive neurodegeneration and early death, typically at ages from 8 to 12 years. Twenty years ago, our phase I clinical trial treated subjects with CLN2 disease by a catheter-based CNS administration of an adeno-associated virus vector serotype 2 (AAV2) expressing the <i>CLN2</i> gene. Here we present an analysis of the survival of the 10 treated children and find 2 distinct survival groups with a wide disparity in survival. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 7) had the typical mean survival of 8.8 ± 0.5 years of age, 3.8 ± 0.6 years post-therapy. Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 3) had a markedly longer mean survival of 23.4 ± 2.4 years of age and 14.9 ± 2.8 years post-therapy (<i>p</i> < 0.00002, survival of group 1 vs. group 2). Long survivors (group 2) at the time of treatment were older (group 1: 5.0 ± 0.6 years; group 2: 8.5 ± 0.9 years; <i>p</i> < 0.02); had similar disease severity (Hamburg clinical score group 1: 4.7 ± 0.5, group 2: 3 ± 0.0, <i>p</i> > 0.05); and had larger CNS ventricular volume (81.1 ± 22.2 cm<sup>3</sup> vs. 27.3 ± 7.2 cm<sup>3</sup> for group 1; <i>p</i> < 0.02). While the genotype of 3, group 2 subjects, had one allele (509-1G>C) identical to that of three in group 1, the second allele was different. This was unlikely to explain the survival difference, as alleles for both groups were equally predicted deleterious by the Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion score: 34.9 ± 0.7 and 32.8 ± 0.3 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (a score of >20 is considered deleterious). This represents one of the longest survival studies (up to 20 years) of AAV-treated individuals with hereditary disorders and demonstrates variability of therapeutic efficacy where the genotype on its own has no apparent survival advantage. Protocol registration numbers for the original study: NCT00151216 and NCT00151268; www.clinicaltrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":13007,"journal":{"name":"Human gene therapy","volume":" ","pages":"28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twenty-Year Survival Analysis of Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Serotype 2-Mediated Gene Therapy to the Central Nervous System for CLN2 Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Dolan Sondhi, Stephen M Kaminsky, Jonathan B Rosenberg, Mahboubeh R Rostami, Neil R Hackett, Ronald G Crystal\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/hum.2024.182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CLN2 disease (late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis) is an autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disease that results from loss of function mutations in the <i>CLN2</i> gene, which encodes tripeptidyl peptidase 1. It affects the central nervous system (CNS) with progressive neurodegeneration and early death, typically at ages from 8 to 12 years. Twenty years ago, our phase I clinical trial treated subjects with CLN2 disease by a catheter-based CNS administration of an adeno-associated virus vector serotype 2 (AAV2) expressing the <i>CLN2</i> gene. Here we present an analysis of the survival of the 10 treated children and find 2 distinct survival groups with a wide disparity in survival. Group 1 (<i>n</i> = 7) had the typical mean survival of 8.8 ± 0.5 years of age, 3.8 ± 0.6 years post-therapy. Group 2 (<i>n</i> = 3) had a markedly longer mean survival of 23.4 ± 2.4 years of age and 14.9 ± 2.8 years post-therapy (<i>p</i> < 0.00002, survival of group 1 vs. group 2). Long survivors (group 2) at the time of treatment were older (group 1: 5.0 ± 0.6 years; group 2: 8.5 ± 0.9 years; <i>p</i> < 0.02); had similar disease severity (Hamburg clinical score group 1: 4.7 ± 0.5, group 2: 3 ± 0.0, <i>p</i> > 0.05); and had larger CNS ventricular volume (81.1 ± 22.2 cm<sup>3</sup> vs. 27.3 ± 7.2 cm<sup>3</sup> for group 1; <i>p</i> < 0.02). While the genotype of 3, group 2 subjects, had one allele (509-1G>C) identical to that of three in group 1, the second allele was different. This was unlikely to explain the survival difference, as alleles for both groups were equally predicted deleterious by the Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion score: 34.9 ± 0.7 and 32.8 ± 0.3 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (a score of >20 is considered deleterious). This represents one of the longest survival studies (up to 20 years) of AAV-treated individuals with hereditary disorders and demonstrates variability of therapeutic efficacy where the genotype on its own has no apparent survival advantage. Protocol registration numbers for the original study: NCT00151216 and NCT00151268; www.clinicaltrials.gov.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human gene therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"28-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human gene therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2024.182\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human gene therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2024.182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CLN2病是一种常染色体隐性遗传的神经退行性溶酶体贮积病,由编码三肽基肽酶1的CLN2基因功能突变丧失引起。它影响中枢神经系统(CNS),伴有进行性神经变性和早期死亡,通常发生在8至12岁之间。20年前,我们的I期临床试验通过导管为基础的中枢神经系统给药表达CLN2基因的腺相关病毒载体血清型2 (AAV2)治疗CLN2患者。在这里,我们对10名接受治疗的儿童的生存进行了分析,发现两个不同的生存组在生存方面存在很大的差异。组1 (n = 7)的典型平均生存期为8.8±0.5岁,治疗后3.8±0.6年。2组(n = 3)患者的平均生存期明显延长,分别为23.4±2.4岁和14.9±2.8年(p < 0.00002, 1组与2组的生存期比较)。治疗时存活时间较长的患者(2组)年龄较大(1组:5.0±0.6岁;第二组:8.5±0.9岁;P < 0.02);疾病严重程度相近(汉堡临床评分组1:4.7±0.5,组2:3±0.0,p < 0.05);CNS心室容积较大(81.1±22.2 cm3 vs. 27.3±7.2 cm3);P < 0.02)。2组3名受试者的基因型与1组3名受试者的基因型有1个等位基因(509-1G>C)相同,但2个等位基因不同。这可能无法解释生存差异,因为两组的等位基因通过联合注释依赖损耗评分同样预测为有害:1组和2组分别为34.9±0.7和32.8±0.3(分数为bbb20被认为是有害的)。这是对aav治疗的遗传性疾病患者进行的最长生存期研究之一(长达20年),并证明了基因型本身没有明显生存优势的治疗效果的可变性。原始研究的方案注册号:NCT00151216和NCT00151268;www.clinicaltrials.gov。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Twenty-Year Survival Analysis of Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Serotype 2-Mediated Gene Therapy to the Central Nervous System for CLN2 Disease.

CLN2 disease (late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis) is an autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disease that results from loss of function mutations in the CLN2 gene, which encodes tripeptidyl peptidase 1. It affects the central nervous system (CNS) with progressive neurodegeneration and early death, typically at ages from 8 to 12 years. Twenty years ago, our phase I clinical trial treated subjects with CLN2 disease by a catheter-based CNS administration of an adeno-associated virus vector serotype 2 (AAV2) expressing the CLN2 gene. Here we present an analysis of the survival of the 10 treated children and find 2 distinct survival groups with a wide disparity in survival. Group 1 (n = 7) had the typical mean survival of 8.8 ± 0.5 years of age, 3.8 ± 0.6 years post-therapy. Group 2 (n = 3) had a markedly longer mean survival of 23.4 ± 2.4 years of age and 14.9 ± 2.8 years post-therapy (p < 0.00002, survival of group 1 vs. group 2). Long survivors (group 2) at the time of treatment were older (group 1: 5.0 ± 0.6 years; group 2: 8.5 ± 0.9 years; p < 0.02); had similar disease severity (Hamburg clinical score group 1: 4.7 ± 0.5, group 2: 3 ± 0.0, p > 0.05); and had larger CNS ventricular volume (81.1 ± 22.2 cm3 vs. 27.3 ± 7.2 cm3 for group 1; p < 0.02). While the genotype of 3, group 2 subjects, had one allele (509-1G>C) identical to that of three in group 1, the second allele was different. This was unlikely to explain the survival difference, as alleles for both groups were equally predicted deleterious by the Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion score: 34.9 ± 0.7 and 32.8 ± 0.3 for groups 1 and 2, respectively (a score of >20 is considered deleterious). This represents one of the longest survival studies (up to 20 years) of AAV-treated individuals with hereditary disorders and demonstrates variability of therapeutic efficacy where the genotype on its own has no apparent survival advantage. Protocol registration numbers for the original study: NCT00151216 and NCT00151268; www.clinicaltrials.gov.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human gene therapy
Human gene therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Gene Therapy is the premier, multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of gene therapy. The Journal publishes in-depth coverage of DNA, RNA, and cell therapies by delivering the latest breakthroughs in research and technologies. Human Gene Therapy provides a central forum for scientific and clinical information, including ethical, legal, regulatory, social, and commercial issues, which enables the advancement and progress of therapeutic procedures leading to improved patient outcomes, and ultimately, to curing diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信