分娩时硬膜外麻醉失败的处理指南。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002108
Nicolas Brogly, Isabel Valbuena Gómez, Arash Afshari, Kim Ekelund, Peter Kranke, Carolyn F Weiniger, Nuala Lucas, Pierre-Yves Dewandre, Emilia Guasch Arevalo, Alexander Ioscovich, Andrea Kollmann, Kim Lindelof, Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Stephanie Reis, Oscar van den Bosch, Marc Van de Velde, Carolina S Romero
{"title":"分娩时硬膜外麻醉失败的处理指南。","authors":"Nicolas Brogly, Isabel Valbuena Gómez, Arash Afshari, Kim Ekelund, Peter Kranke, Carolyn F Weiniger, Nuala Lucas, Pierre-Yves Dewandre, Emilia Guasch Arevalo, Alexander Ioscovich, Andrea Kollmann, Kim Lindelof, Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Stephanie Reis, Oscar van den Bosch, Marc Van de Velde, Carolina S Romero","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Labour epidural analgesia reportedly fails in up to 10 to 25% of cases. A joint taskforce of European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) experts was created to develop this focused guideline on the management of failing epidural analgesia in a previously well functioning epidural catheter.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Six clinical questions were defined using a PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) strategy to conduct a systematic literature search. The questions pertained to clinical management of failing epidural (PICOs 1, 2 and 3), human resource and team training (PICOs 4 and 5) and clinical management of a failing epidural for intrapartum caesarean delivery (PICO 6). The taskforce produced recommendations and clinical practice statements (CPS) and validated them through a Delphi process. The final version of the guideline was submitted to all ESAIC members for critical review and approved by the Guidelines Committee and the ESAIC Board of Directors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the initial search, 3737 titles were identified, 93 were retained for complete article analysis and 56 were finally allocated to the PICOs. The full-text analysis of the selected articles precluded extraction of significant data for all PICOs except for PICO 6, for which six articles were identified. Based on the experience, knowledge and opinion of the experts, the task force proposed and validated two recommendations and 11 CPSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This guideline complemented other recently published expert opinion papers. We hope that this new guidance will serve clinicians to increase parturient safety and quality of care during labour and delivery, while at the same time provide inspiration for further research to fill the current knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":"42 2","pages":"96-112"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESAIC focused guidelines for the management of the failing epidural during labour epidural analgesia.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Brogly, Isabel Valbuena Gómez, Arash Afshari, Kim Ekelund, Peter Kranke, Carolyn F Weiniger, Nuala Lucas, Pierre-Yves Dewandre, Emilia Guasch Arevalo, Alexander Ioscovich, Andrea Kollmann, Kim Lindelof, Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Stephanie Reis, Oscar van den Bosch, Marc Van de Velde, Carolina S Romero\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Labour epidural analgesia reportedly fails in up to 10 to 25% of cases. A joint taskforce of European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) experts was created to develop this focused guideline on the management of failing epidural analgesia in a previously well functioning epidural catheter.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Six clinical questions were defined using a PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) strategy to conduct a systematic literature search. The questions pertained to clinical management of failing epidural (PICOs 1, 2 and 3), human resource and team training (PICOs 4 and 5) and clinical management of a failing epidural for intrapartum caesarean delivery (PICO 6). The taskforce produced recommendations and clinical practice statements (CPS) and validated them through a Delphi process. The final version of the guideline was submitted to all ESAIC members for critical review and approved by the Guidelines Committee and the ESAIC Board of Directors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the initial search, 3737 titles were identified, 93 were retained for complete article analysis and 56 were finally allocated to the PICOs. The full-text analysis of the selected articles precluded extraction of significant data for all PICOs except for PICO 6, for which six articles were identified. Based on the experience, knowledge and opinion of the experts, the task force proposed and validated two recommendations and 11 CPSs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This guideline complemented other recently published expert opinion papers. We hope that this new guidance will serve clinicians to increase parturient safety and quality of care during labour and delivery, while at the same time provide inspiration for further research to fill the current knowledge gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"96-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,分娩时硬膜外镇痛失败率高达10 - 25%。欧洲麻醉与重症监护学会(ESAIC)专家组成了一个联合工作组,旨在制定这一重点指南,指导对先前功能良好的硬膜外导管进行硬膜外镇痛失败的处理。设计:采用PICO(人群/干预/比较/结果)策略定义6个临床问题,进行系统的文献检索。这些问题涉及硬膜外失败的临床管理(PICOs 1、2和3)、人力资源和团队培训(PICOs 4和5)以及硬膜外分娩失败的临床管理(PICO 6)。工作组提出了建议和临床实践声明(CPS),并通过德尔菲过程对其进行验证。准则的最终版本已提交给ESAIC所有成员进行严格审查,并由准则委员会和ESAIC董事会批准。结果:在最初的检索中,共识别出3737个标题,其中93个保留用于完整的文章分析,56个最终分配给pico。所选文章的全文分析排除了除PICO 6外所有PICO的重要数据提取,PICO 6确定了6篇文章。根据专家们的经验、知识和意见,工作队提出并确认了两项建议和11项方案。结论:该指南补充了其他最近发表的专家意见文件。我们希望这份新的指南能够帮助临床医生提高分娩和分娩过程中产妇的安全和护理质量,同时为进一步的研究提供灵感,以填补目前的知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ESAIC focused guidelines for the management of the failing epidural during labour epidural analgesia.

Background: Labour epidural analgesia reportedly fails in up to 10 to 25% of cases. A joint taskforce of European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) experts was created to develop this focused guideline on the management of failing epidural analgesia in a previously well functioning epidural catheter.

Design: Six clinical questions were defined using a PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) strategy to conduct a systematic literature search. The questions pertained to clinical management of failing epidural (PICOs 1, 2 and 3), human resource and team training (PICOs 4 and 5) and clinical management of a failing epidural for intrapartum caesarean delivery (PICO 6). The taskforce produced recommendations and clinical practice statements (CPS) and validated them through a Delphi process. The final version of the guideline was submitted to all ESAIC members for critical review and approved by the Guidelines Committee and the ESAIC Board of Directors.

Results: In the initial search, 3737 titles were identified, 93 were retained for complete article analysis and 56 were finally allocated to the PICOs. The full-text analysis of the selected articles precluded extraction of significant data for all PICOs except for PICO 6, for which six articles were identified. Based on the experience, knowledge and opinion of the experts, the task force proposed and validated two recommendations and 11 CPSs.

Conclusion: This guideline complemented other recently published expert opinion papers. We hope that this new guidance will serve clinicians to increase parturient safety and quality of care during labour and delivery, while at the same time provide inspiration for further research to fill the current knowledge gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信