抗pd1免疫治疗和循环肿瘤细胞对手术胰腺腺癌无进展生存期的影响:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Yong-Gang He, Yi-Nan Zhu, Zhou-You Xiao, Zheng Wang, Chao-Qun Wang, Jing-Li, Xiao-Bing Huang, Lu Zheng
{"title":"抗pd1免疫治疗和循环肿瘤细胞对手术胰腺腺癌无进展生存期的影响:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Yong-Gang He, Yi-Nan Zhu, Zhou-You Xiao, Zheng Wang, Chao-Qun Wang, Jing-Li, Xiao-Bing Huang, Lu Zheng","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2024.2448989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical benefits of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy and surgical resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remain unclear. The expression and clinical significance of HIF1A in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared survival outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients treated with two regimens: surgery+chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine)+anti-PD1 (Tislelizumab) (S+AG+anti-PD1) (<i>n</i> = 37), and surgery+chemotherapy (S+AG) (<i>n</i> = 5). The study also evaluated CTCs and HIF1A-positive CTCs as potential prognostic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The S+AG+anti-PD1 group (<i>n</i> = 37) showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) compared to S+AG (<i>n</i> = 15) in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.426, 95% CI: 0.185-0.983, <i>p</i> = 0.045). Overall survival (OS) differences were not statistically significant between groups. Lower CTC counts (≤1) were associated with longer PFS in surgical patients. This association was confirmed in multivariate analysis, after adjustment for AJCC stages (HR: 0.318, 95% CI: 0.104-0.974, <i>p</i> = 0.045). HIF1A-positive CTCs showed similar trends and prognostic significance to total CTC counts. Advanced AJCC stages remained the strongest independent predictor of worse PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy may improve PFS in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. While CTCs and HIF1A-positive CTCs may have prognostic value, AJCC staging remains the most reliable indicator.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anti-PD1 immunotherapy and circulating tumor cells on progression-free survival in surgical pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Gang He, Yi-Nan Zhu, Zhou-You Xiao, Zheng Wang, Chao-Qun Wang, Jing-Li, Xiao-Bing Huang, Lu Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1744666X.2024.2448989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical benefits of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy and surgical resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remain unclear. The expression and clinical significance of HIF1A in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study compared survival outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients treated with two regimens: surgery+chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine)+anti-PD1 (Tislelizumab) (S+AG+anti-PD1) (<i>n</i> = 37), and surgery+chemotherapy (S+AG) (<i>n</i> = 5). The study also evaluated CTCs and HIF1A-positive CTCs as potential prognostic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The S+AG+anti-PD1 group (<i>n</i> = 37) showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) compared to S+AG (<i>n</i> = 15) in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.426, 95% CI: 0.185-0.983, <i>p</i> = 0.045). Overall survival (OS) differences were not statistically significant between groups. Lower CTC counts (≤1) were associated with longer PFS in surgical patients. This association was confirmed in multivariate analysis, after adjustment for AJCC stages (HR: 0.318, 95% CI: 0.104-0.974, <i>p</i> = 0.045). HIF1A-positive CTCs showed similar trends and prognostic significance to total CTC counts. Advanced AJCC stages remained the strongest independent predictor of worse PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy may improve PFS in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. While CTCs and HIF1A-positive CTCs may have prognostic value, AJCC staging remains the most reliable indicator.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2024.2448989\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2024.2448989","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫治疗联合化疗和手术切除治疗胰腺腺癌的临床疗效尚不清楚。HIF1A在胰腺腺癌循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)中的表达和临床意义仍然有限。方法:这项回顾性队列研究比较了两种方案治疗胰腺腺癌患者的生存结果:手术+化疗(nab-紫杉醇加吉西他滨)+抗pd1 (Tislelizumab) (S+AG+抗pd1)和手术+化疗(S+AG)。该研究还评估了ctc和hif1a阳性ctc作为潜在的预后生物标志物。两组共52例患者。结果:多因素分析显示,S+AG+抗pd1组(n = 37)的无进展生存期(PFS)明显优于S+AG (n = 15) (HR: 0.426, 95% CI: 0.185 ~ 0.983, p = 0.045)。两组间总生存期(OS)差异无统计学意义。较低的CTC计数(≤1)与手术患者较长的PFS相关。在调整AJCC分期后,多变量分析证实了这种关联(HR: 0.318, 95% CI: 0.104-0.974, p = 0.045)。hif1a阳性CTC与总CTC计数有相似的趋势和预后意义。AJCC晚期仍然是PFS和OS恶化的最强独立预测因子。结论:本研究提示手术、化疗和免疫治疗联合治疗可改善可切除胰腺腺癌的PFS。虽然ctc和hif1a阳性ctc可能具有预后价值,但AJCC分期仍然是最可靠的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of anti-PD1 immunotherapy and circulating tumor cells on progression-free survival in surgical pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: The clinical benefits of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy and surgical resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remain unclear. The expression and clinical significance of HIF1A in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains limited.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared survival outcomes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients treated with two regimens: surgery+chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine)+anti-PD1 (Tislelizumab) (S+AG+anti-PD1) (n = 37), and surgery+chemotherapy (S+AG) (n = 5). The study also evaluated CTCs and HIF1A-positive CTCs as potential prognostic biomarkers.

Results: The S+AG+anti-PD1 group (n = 37) showed significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) compared to S+AG (n = 15) in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.426, 95% CI: 0.185-0.983, p = 0.045). Overall survival (OS) differences were not statistically significant between groups. Lower CTC counts (≤1) were associated with longer PFS in surgical patients. This association was confirmed in multivariate analysis, after adjustment for AJCC stages (HR: 0.318, 95% CI: 0.104-0.974, p = 0.045). HIF1A-positive CTCs showed similar trends and prognostic significance to total CTC counts. Advanced AJCC stages remained the strongest independent predictor of worse PFS and OS.

Conclusion: Combining surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy may improve PFS in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. While CTCs and HIF1A-positive CTCs may have prognostic value, AJCC staging remains the most reliable indicator.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology. Articles focus on the following key areas: • Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines • Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents • New diagnostic approaches • Screening and patient stratification • Pharmacoeconomic studies • New therapeutic indications for existing therapies • Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction • Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval • Novel treatment strategies • Epidemiological studies • Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信