使用SwiftScan碲化镉锌探测器提高短时间骨SPECT图像质量。

Q3 Medicine
Kazuto Funakoshi, Tomohiko Yamane, Eito Kozawa, Ichiro Matsunari
{"title":"使用SwiftScan碲化镉锌探测器提高短时间骨SPECT图像质量。","authors":"Kazuto Funakoshi, Tomohiko Yamane, Eito Kozawa, Ichiro Matsunari","doi":"10.22038/aojnmb.2024.76919.1543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the quality and associated quantitative values of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with and without SwiftScan using a semiconductor camera equipped with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer who underwent list-mode SPECT/computed tomography using a whole-body semiconductor camera participated in this study. A total of 130 metastatic lesions from 10 patients were analyzed. Standard SPECT images were obtained approximately 3 h later, and the images were constructed with and without SwiftScan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visual assessment of 3-dimensional maximum intensity projection images showed that when an image quality score of 4 (good) or better was considered clinically acceptable, it was maintained at 4 or better in the 75% and 50% scans with SwiftScan, whereas only the 75% scan was considered acceptable without SwiftScan. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.952 at 5% for the standard time without SwiftScan and 0.990 with SwiftScan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) changes were 0 to 9.5 (median 1.1) at 75%, 0.1 to 11.5 (1.65) at 50%, 0 to 15.7 (2.1) at 25%, 0.1 to 33.2 (4.2) at 10%, 0.2 to 8.9 (5.65) at 5% without SwiftScan. On the contrary, the SUV<sub>max</sub> changes in absolute value were 0 to 5.4 (median 0.8) at 75%, 0 to 6.5 (1.4) at 50%, 0 to 19.1 (1.7) at 25%, 0 to 24.2 (2.8) at 10%, 0 to 29.9 (2.6) at 5% with SwiftScan. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were 95.3 at 75%, 88.3 at 50%, 69.2 at 25%, 45.7 at 10%, and 31.6 at 5% without SwiftScan, and 96.9, 91.7, 78.0, 71.6, and 62.0, respectively, using SwiftScan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the use of SwiftScan, a 50% reduction in acquisition time was considered acceptable for image quality with reproducible quantitative indices such as SUV<sub>max</sub> and CNR.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":"87-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the image quality of short-time bone SPECT using cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors with SwiftScan.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuto Funakoshi, Tomohiko Yamane, Eito Kozawa, Ichiro Matsunari\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/aojnmb.2024.76919.1543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the quality and associated quantitative values of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with and without SwiftScan using a semiconductor camera equipped with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer who underwent list-mode SPECT/computed tomography using a whole-body semiconductor camera participated in this study. A total of 130 metastatic lesions from 10 patients were analyzed. Standard SPECT images were obtained approximately 3 h later, and the images were constructed with and without SwiftScan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The visual assessment of 3-dimensional maximum intensity projection images showed that when an image quality score of 4 (good) or better was considered clinically acceptable, it was maintained at 4 or better in the 75% and 50% scans with SwiftScan, whereas only the 75% scan was considered acceptable without SwiftScan. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.952 at 5% for the standard time without SwiftScan and 0.990 with SwiftScan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) changes were 0 to 9.5 (median 1.1) at 75%, 0.1 to 11.5 (1.65) at 50%, 0 to 15.7 (2.1) at 25%, 0.1 to 33.2 (4.2) at 10%, 0.2 to 8.9 (5.65) at 5% without SwiftScan. On the contrary, the SUV<sub>max</sub> changes in absolute value were 0 to 5.4 (median 0.8) at 75%, 0 to 6.5 (1.4) at 50%, 0 to 19.1 (1.7) at 25%, 0 to 24.2 (2.8) at 10%, 0 to 29.9 (2.6) at 5% with SwiftScan. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were 95.3 at 75%, 88.3 at 50%, 69.2 at 25%, 45.7 at 10%, and 31.6 at 5% without SwiftScan, and 96.9, 91.7, 78.0, 71.6, and 62.0, respectively, using SwiftScan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the use of SwiftScan, a 50% reduction in acquisition time was considered acceptable for image quality with reproducible quantitative indices such as SUV<sub>max</sub> and CNR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"87-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2024.76919.1543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/aojnmb.2024.76919.1543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估骨单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的质量和相关的定量值,使用半导体相机配备镉锌碲化探测器。方法:10例前列腺癌骨转移患者使用全身半导体相机进行列表模式SPECT/计算机断层扫描。我们分析了10例患者的130个转移灶。大约3小时后获得标准SPECT图像,并使用SwiftScan和不使用SwiftScan构建图像。结果:三维最大强度投影图像的视觉评估显示,当图像质量评分为4分(良好)或更高时,使用SwiftScan进行75%和50%扫描时,图像质量评分维持在4分或更高,而不使用SwiftScan时,只有75%扫描被认为是可接受的。在5%的标准时间内,未加SwiftScan的组内相关系数为0.952,加SwiftScan的组内相关系数为0.990。75%时最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)变化为0 ~ 9.5(中位数1.1),50%时为0.1 ~ 11.5(1.65),25%时为0 ~ 15.7(2.1),10%时为0.1 ~ 33.2(4.2),5%时为0.2 ~ 8.9(5.65)。与此相反,SwiftScan在75%时的SUVmax绝对值变化为0 ~ 5.4(中位数0.8),50%时为0 ~ 6.5(1.4),25%时为0 ~ 19.1(1.7),10%时为0 ~ 24.2(2.8),5%时为0 ~ 29.9(2.6)。未使用SwiftScan的对比噪声比(CNR)分别为:75%时95.3、50%时88.3、25%时69.2、10%时45.7、5%时31.6,使用SwiftScan的对比噪声比(CNR)分别为96.9、91.7、78.0、71.6、62.0。结论:使用SwiftScan, 50%的采集时间减少被认为是可接受的图像质量具有可重复的定量指标,如SUVmax和CNR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the image quality of short-time bone SPECT using cadmium-zinc-telluride detectors with SwiftScan.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the quality and associated quantitative values of bone single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with and without SwiftScan using a semiconductor camera equipped with a cadmium-zinc-telluride detector.

Methods: Ten patients with bone metastases from prostate cancer who underwent list-mode SPECT/computed tomography using a whole-body semiconductor camera participated in this study. A total of 130 metastatic lesions from 10 patients were analyzed. Standard SPECT images were obtained approximately 3 h later, and the images were constructed with and without SwiftScan.

Results: The visual assessment of 3-dimensional maximum intensity projection images showed that when an image quality score of 4 (good) or better was considered clinically acceptable, it was maintained at 4 or better in the 75% and 50% scans with SwiftScan, whereas only the 75% scan was considered acceptable without SwiftScan. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.952 at 5% for the standard time without SwiftScan and 0.990 with SwiftScan. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) changes were 0 to 9.5 (median 1.1) at 75%, 0.1 to 11.5 (1.65) at 50%, 0 to 15.7 (2.1) at 25%, 0.1 to 33.2 (4.2) at 10%, 0.2 to 8.9 (5.65) at 5% without SwiftScan. On the contrary, the SUVmax changes in absolute value were 0 to 5.4 (median 0.8) at 75%, 0 to 6.5 (1.4) at 50%, 0 to 19.1 (1.7) at 25%, 0 to 24.2 (2.8) at 10%, 0 to 29.9 (2.6) at 5% with SwiftScan. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were 95.3 at 75%, 88.3 at 50%, 69.2 at 25%, 45.7 at 10%, and 31.6 at 5% without SwiftScan, and 96.9, 91.7, 78.0, 71.6, and 62.0, respectively, using SwiftScan.

Conclusion: With the use of SwiftScan, a 50% reduction in acquisition time was considered acceptable for image quality with reproducible quantitative indices such as SUVmax and CNR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信