结直肠癌微创手术的增加与机器人手术的采用有关。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Naveen Manisundaram, Christopher P Childers, Chung-Yuan Hu, Abhineet Uppal, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Brian Bednarski, Michael G White, Oliver Peacock, Y Nancy You, George J Chang
{"title":"结直肠癌微创手术的增加与机器人手术的采用有关。","authors":"Naveen Manisundaram, Christopher P Childers, Chung-Yuan Hu, Abhineet Uppal, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Brian Bednarski, Michael G White, Oliver Peacock, Y Nancy You, George J Chang","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved short-term outcomes and similar long-term oncologic outcomes for colorectal cancer patients compared with open surgery. Although the robotic approach has ergonomic and technical benefits, how it has impacted utilization of traditional laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive surgery overall is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe trends in open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches for colorectal cancer resections and examine factors associated with minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 through 2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Commission on Cancer-accredited U.S. facilities.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon or rectal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Surgical approach rates (open, robotic, laparoscopic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 475,001 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, of whom 192,237 (40.5%) underwent open surgery, 64,945 (13.7%) underwent robotic surgery, and 217,819 (45.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. For colon cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery use steadily increased, with a peak prevalence of 54.0% in 2016, and total minimally invasive surgery (robotic + laparoscopic) was performed more often than open surgery from 2013 through 2020. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery had a peak prevalence of 37.2% in 2014 and declined from 2014 through 2020; robotic surgery prevalence increased throughout the study period (5.5% in 2010, 24.7% in 2015, 48.8% in 2020). Minimally invasive surgery use increased in facilities performing robotic surgery every year during the study period. For both colon and rectal cancer, use of open surgery decreased across all facilities throughout the study period.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Utilized National Cancer Database which may not be generalizable to non-Commission on Cancer institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery steadily increased across all facilities from 2010 through 2020. Open resections declined, laparoscopic resections plateaued, and robotic resections increased for colon and rectal cancer. Minimally invasive surgery increases may be driven by increases in robot-assisted surgery. See Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rise in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Robotic Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Naveen Manisundaram, Christopher P Childers, Chung-Yuan Hu, Abhineet Uppal, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Brian Bednarski, Michael G White, Oliver Peacock, Y Nancy You, George J Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved short-term outcomes and similar long-term oncologic outcomes for colorectal cancer patients compared with open surgery. Although the robotic approach has ergonomic and technical benefits, how it has impacted utilization of traditional laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive surgery overall is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe trends in open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches for colorectal cancer resections and examine factors associated with minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 through 2020.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Commission on Cancer-accredited U.S. facilities.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon or rectal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>Surgical approach rates (open, robotic, laparoscopic).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 475,001 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, of whom 192,237 (40.5%) underwent open surgery, 64,945 (13.7%) underwent robotic surgery, and 217,819 (45.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. For colon cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery use steadily increased, with a peak prevalence of 54.0% in 2016, and total minimally invasive surgery (robotic + laparoscopic) was performed more often than open surgery from 2013 through 2020. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery had a peak prevalence of 37.2% in 2014 and declined from 2014 through 2020; robotic surgery prevalence increased throughout the study period (5.5% in 2010, 24.7% in 2015, 48.8% in 2020). Minimally invasive surgery use increased in facilities performing robotic surgery every year during the study period. For both colon and rectal cancer, use of open surgery decreased across all facilities throughout the study period.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Utilized National Cancer Database which may not be generalizable to non-Commission on Cancer institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery steadily increased across all facilities from 2010 through 2020. Open resections declined, laparoscopic resections plateaued, and robotic resections increased for colon and rectal cancer. Minimally invasive surgery increases may be driven by increases in robot-assisted surgery. See Video Abstract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003617\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与开放手术相比,微创手术可改善结直肠癌患者的短期预后和相似的长期肿瘤预后。尽管机器人方法具有人体工程学和技术上的优势,但它如何影响传统腹腔镜手术和微创手术的总体应用尚不清楚。目的:描述开放、机器人和腹腔镜入路在结直肠癌切除术中的发展趋势,并探讨微创手术的相关因素。设计:回顾性队列研究,使用2010年至2020年国家癌症数据库的数据。环境:美国癌症委员会认可的设施。患者:诊断为非转移性结肠或直肠腺癌的患者。主要观察指标:手术入路率(开放、机器人、腹腔镜)。结果:我们确定了475,001例确诊为非转移性结直肠腺癌的患者,其中192,237例(40.5%)接受了开放手术,64,945例(13.7%)接受了机器人手术,217,819例(45.9%)接受了腹腔镜手术。对于结肠癌,腹腔镜微创手术的使用稳步增加,2016年达到54.0%的峰值,2013 - 2020年,全微创手术(机器人+腹腔镜)的使用频率高于开放手术。对于直肠癌,腹腔镜微创手术的患病率在2014年达到37.2%的峰值,从2014年到2020年呈下降趋势;在整个研究期间,机器人手术的患病率有所上升(2010年为5.5%,2015年为24.7%,2020年为48.8%)。在研究期间,微创手术的使用在每年进行机器人手术的机构中都有所增加。对于结肠癌和直肠癌,在整个研究期间,所有机构的开放式手术的使用都有所减少。局限性:使用的国家癌症数据库可能无法推广到非癌症委员会机构。结论:从2010年到2020年,所有医院的微创手术稳步增加。对于结肠癌和直肠癌,开放式手术减少,腹腔镜手术趋于平稳,机器人手术增加。微创手术的增加可能是由于机器人辅助手术的增加。参见视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rise in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Robotic Surgery.

Background: Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved short-term outcomes and similar long-term oncologic outcomes for colorectal cancer patients compared with open surgery. Although the robotic approach has ergonomic and technical benefits, how it has impacted utilization of traditional laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive surgery overall is unclear.

Objective: Describe trends in open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches for colorectal cancer resections and examine factors associated with minimally invasive surgery.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 through 2020.

Setting: Commission on Cancer-accredited U.S. facilities.

Patients: Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon or rectal adenocarcinoma.

Main outcomes measures: Surgical approach rates (open, robotic, laparoscopic).

Results: We identified 475,001 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, of whom 192,237 (40.5%) underwent open surgery, 64,945 (13.7%) underwent robotic surgery, and 217,819 (45.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. For colon cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery use steadily increased, with a peak prevalence of 54.0% in 2016, and total minimally invasive surgery (robotic + laparoscopic) was performed more often than open surgery from 2013 through 2020. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery had a peak prevalence of 37.2% in 2014 and declined from 2014 through 2020; robotic surgery prevalence increased throughout the study period (5.5% in 2010, 24.7% in 2015, 48.8% in 2020). Minimally invasive surgery use increased in facilities performing robotic surgery every year during the study period. For both colon and rectal cancer, use of open surgery decreased across all facilities throughout the study period.

Limitations: Utilized National Cancer Database which may not be generalizable to non-Commission on Cancer institutions.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery steadily increased across all facilities from 2010 through 2020. Open resections declined, laparoscopic resections plateaued, and robotic resections increased for colon and rectal cancer. Minimally invasive surgery increases may be driven by increases in robot-assisted surgery. See Video Abstract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信