双交叉多韧带与单交叉多韧带膝关节损伤患者报告的结果

Ingrid Trøan, Tone Bere, Inger Holm, Robert F. LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe
{"title":"双交叉多韧带与单交叉多韧带膝关节损伤患者报告的结果","authors":"Ingrid Trøan, Tone Bere, Inger Holm, Robert F. LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe","doi":"10.1177/03635465241293743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are heterogeneous, and bicruciate knee ligament injuries are considered a serious form of this injury. The current literature tends not to distinguish between single and bicruciate MLKI when reporting outcomes.Purpose:To investigate patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI comparing single cruciate MLKI with bicruciate MLKI. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of different factors on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS), and a visual analog scale for pain.Results:Of the 191 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 124 (65%) agreed to participate and had a complete data set with a follow-up time at a mean 74 ± 27 months. Patients with single cruciate MLKI (type I) had significantly higher scores for IKDC ( P = .007), Lysholm ( P = .012), KOOS Pain ( P = .04), KOOS Activities of Daily Living ( P = .01), KOOS Sport and Recreation ( P = .005), KOOS Quality of Life ( P = .04), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> (which considers the subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life) ( P = .01), Tegner ( P = .04), and visual analog scale for pain during activity ( P = .004) when compared with patients with bicruciate MLKI (type II-type IV). Furthermore, age was significantly associated with a lower IKDC ( P = .001), and an increased severity of injury was significantly associated with IKDC ( P = .015), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> ( P = .022), and Lysholm ( P = .029) scores.Conclusion:MLKIs involving a single cruciate ligament had significantly higher patient-reported postoperative outcome measures compared with bicruciate MLKIs. Age and type of injury were important predictors for outcomes. Patients presenting with dislocated knees had lower patient-reported outcomes; however, there was no significant difference in outcomes between bicruciate MLKIs and patients presenting with dislocated knees.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcomes of Bicruciate Multiligament Versus Single Cruciate Multiligament Knee Injuries\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Trøan, Tone Bere, Inger Holm, Robert F. LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241293743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are heterogeneous, and bicruciate knee ligament injuries are considered a serious form of this injury. The current literature tends not to distinguish between single and bicruciate MLKI when reporting outcomes.Purpose:To investigate patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI comparing single cruciate MLKI with bicruciate MLKI. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of different factors on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS), and a visual analog scale for pain.Results:Of the 191 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 124 (65%) agreed to participate and had a complete data set with a follow-up time at a mean 74 ± 27 months. Patients with single cruciate MLKI (type I) had significantly higher scores for IKDC ( P = .007), Lysholm ( P = .012), KOOS Pain ( P = .04), KOOS Activities of Daily Living ( P = .01), KOOS Sport and Recreation ( P = .005), KOOS Quality of Life ( P = .04), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> (which considers the subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life) ( P = .01), Tegner ( P = .04), and visual analog scale for pain during activity ( P = .004) when compared with patients with bicruciate MLKI (type II-type IV). Furthermore, age was significantly associated with a lower IKDC ( P = .001), and an increased severity of injury was significantly associated with IKDC ( P = .015), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> ( P = .022), and Lysholm ( P = .029) scores.Conclusion:MLKIs involving a single cruciate ligament had significantly higher patient-reported postoperative outcome measures compared with bicruciate MLKIs. Age and type of injury were important predictors for outcomes. Patients presenting with dislocated knees had lower patient-reported outcomes; however, there was no significant difference in outcomes between bicruciate MLKIs and patients presenting with dislocated knees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241293743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241293743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膝关节多韧带损伤(MLKIs)是异质性的,双十字韧带损伤被认为是这种损伤的一种严重形式。在报告结果时,目前的文献倾向于不区分单和双交叉MLKI。目的:比较单十字交叉与双十字交叉MLKI手术治疗后患者报告的预后。次要目的是调查不同因素对术后患者报告结果的影响。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:本研究采用横断面队列研究。2013年1月至2020年12月在单一一级创伤中心接受MLKI手术治疗的患者纳入本研究。患者报告的结果包括Tegner评分、Lysholm评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)主观膝关节形态、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果调查(oos)以及疼痛的视觉模拟量表。结果:191例符合纳入标准的患者中,124例(65%)同意参与,并有完整的数据集,平均随访时间为74±27个月。单交叉MLKI (I型)患者在IKDC (P = 0.007)、Lysholm (P = 0.012)、oos疼痛(P = 0.04)、oos日常生活活动(P = 0.01)、oos运动和娱乐(P = 0.005)、oos生活质量(P = 0.04)、koo4(考虑疼痛、症状、运动和娱乐和生活质量的亚量表)(P = 0.01)、Tegner (P = 0.04)、此外,年龄与较低的IKDC (P = .001)显著相关,损伤严重程度的增加与IKDC (P = .015)、koo4 (P = .022)和Lysholm (P = .029)评分显著相关。结论:单交叉韧带mlki与双交叉韧带mlki相比,患者报告的术后预后指标明显更高。年龄和损伤类型是预后的重要预测因素。膝关节脱位的患者报告的预后较低;然而,双交叉mlki与膝关节脱位患者的预后无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Bicruciate Multiligament Versus Single Cruciate Multiligament Knee Injuries
Background:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are heterogeneous, and bicruciate knee ligament injuries are considered a serious form of this injury. The current literature tends not to distinguish between single and bicruciate MLKI when reporting outcomes.Purpose:To investigate patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI comparing single cruciate MLKI with bicruciate MLKI. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of different factors on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS), and a visual analog scale for pain.Results:Of the 191 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 124 (65%) agreed to participate and had a complete data set with a follow-up time at a mean 74 ± 27 months. Patients with single cruciate MLKI (type I) had significantly higher scores for IKDC ( P = .007), Lysholm ( P = .012), KOOS Pain ( P = .04), KOOS Activities of Daily Living ( P = .01), KOOS Sport and Recreation ( P = .005), KOOS Quality of Life ( P = .04), KOOS4 (which considers the subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life) ( P = .01), Tegner ( P = .04), and visual analog scale for pain during activity ( P = .004) when compared with patients with bicruciate MLKI (type II-type IV). Furthermore, age was significantly associated with a lower IKDC ( P = .001), and an increased severity of injury was significantly associated with IKDC ( P = .015), KOOS4 ( P = .022), and Lysholm ( P = .029) scores.Conclusion:MLKIs involving a single cruciate ligament had significantly higher patient-reported postoperative outcome measures compared with bicruciate MLKIs. Age and type of injury were important predictors for outcomes. Patients presenting with dislocated knees had lower patient-reported outcomes; however, there was no significant difference in outcomes between bicruciate MLKIs and patients presenting with dislocated knees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信