Ingrid Trøan, Tone Bere, Inger Holm, Robert F. LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe
{"title":"双交叉多韧带与单交叉多韧带膝关节损伤患者报告的结果","authors":"Ingrid Trøan, Tone Bere, Inger Holm, Robert F. LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe","doi":"10.1177/03635465241293743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are heterogeneous, and bicruciate knee ligament injuries are considered a serious form of this injury. The current literature tends not to distinguish between single and bicruciate MLKI when reporting outcomes.Purpose:To investigate patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI comparing single cruciate MLKI with bicruciate MLKI. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of different factors on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS), and a visual analog scale for pain.Results:Of the 191 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 124 (65%) agreed to participate and had a complete data set with a follow-up time at a mean 74 ± 27 months. Patients with single cruciate MLKI (type I) had significantly higher scores for IKDC ( P = .007), Lysholm ( P = .012), KOOS Pain ( P = .04), KOOS Activities of Daily Living ( P = .01), KOOS Sport and Recreation ( P = .005), KOOS Quality of Life ( P = .04), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> (which considers the subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life) ( P = .01), Tegner ( P = .04), and visual analog scale for pain during activity ( P = .004) when compared with patients with bicruciate MLKI (type II-type IV). Furthermore, age was significantly associated with a lower IKDC ( P = .001), and an increased severity of injury was significantly associated with IKDC ( P = .015), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> ( P = .022), and Lysholm ( P = .029) scores.Conclusion:MLKIs involving a single cruciate ligament had significantly higher patient-reported postoperative outcome measures compared with bicruciate MLKIs. Age and type of injury were important predictors for outcomes. Patients presenting with dislocated knees had lower patient-reported outcomes; however, there was no significant difference in outcomes between bicruciate MLKIs and patients presenting with dislocated knees.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcomes of Bicruciate Multiligament Versus Single Cruciate Multiligament Knee Injuries\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Trøan, Tone Bere, Inger Holm, Robert F. LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241293743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are heterogeneous, and bicruciate knee ligament injuries are considered a serious form of this injury. The current literature tends not to distinguish between single and bicruciate MLKI when reporting outcomes.Purpose:To investigate patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI comparing single cruciate MLKI with bicruciate MLKI. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of different factors on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS), and a visual analog scale for pain.Results:Of the 191 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 124 (65%) agreed to participate and had a complete data set with a follow-up time at a mean 74 ± 27 months. Patients with single cruciate MLKI (type I) had significantly higher scores for IKDC ( P = .007), Lysholm ( P = .012), KOOS Pain ( P = .04), KOOS Activities of Daily Living ( P = .01), KOOS Sport and Recreation ( P = .005), KOOS Quality of Life ( P = .04), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> (which considers the subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life) ( P = .01), Tegner ( P = .04), and visual analog scale for pain during activity ( P = .004) when compared with patients with bicruciate MLKI (type II-type IV). Furthermore, age was significantly associated with a lower IKDC ( P = .001), and an increased severity of injury was significantly associated with IKDC ( P = .015), KOOS<jats:sub>4</jats:sub> ( P = .022), and Lysholm ( P = .029) scores.Conclusion:MLKIs involving a single cruciate ligament had significantly higher patient-reported postoperative outcome measures compared with bicruciate MLKIs. Age and type of injury were important predictors for outcomes. Patients presenting with dislocated knees had lower patient-reported outcomes; however, there was no significant difference in outcomes between bicruciate MLKIs and patients presenting with dislocated knees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241293743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241293743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-Reported Outcomes of Bicruciate Multiligament Versus Single Cruciate Multiligament Knee Injuries
Background:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are heterogeneous, and bicruciate knee ligament injuries are considered a serious form of this injury. The current literature tends not to distinguish between single and bicruciate MLKI when reporting outcomes.Purpose:To investigate patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI comparing single cruciate MLKI with bicruciate MLKI. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of different factors on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS), and a visual analog scale for pain.Results:Of the 191 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 124 (65%) agreed to participate and had a complete data set with a follow-up time at a mean 74 ± 27 months. Patients with single cruciate MLKI (type I) had significantly higher scores for IKDC ( P = .007), Lysholm ( P = .012), KOOS Pain ( P = .04), KOOS Activities of Daily Living ( P = .01), KOOS Sport and Recreation ( P = .005), KOOS Quality of Life ( P = .04), KOOS4 (which considers the subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life) ( P = .01), Tegner ( P = .04), and visual analog scale for pain during activity ( P = .004) when compared with patients with bicruciate MLKI (type II-type IV). Furthermore, age was significantly associated with a lower IKDC ( P = .001), and an increased severity of injury was significantly associated with IKDC ( P = .015), KOOS4 ( P = .022), and Lysholm ( P = .029) scores.Conclusion:MLKIs involving a single cruciate ligament had significantly higher patient-reported postoperative outcome measures compared with bicruciate MLKIs. Age and type of injury were important predictors for outcomes. Patients presenting with dislocated knees had lower patient-reported outcomes; however, there was no significant difference in outcomes between bicruciate MLKIs and patients presenting with dislocated knees.