Lenke 1A型和1B型特发性脊柱侧凸青少年浅表背部肌肉的粘弹性特性

IF 1.4 3区医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

Clinical Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106421

Burcu Şenol Gökalp , Ezgi Tarhan Altınok , Gözde Yağcı , Özgün Uysal , Fatih Erbahçeci

{"title":"Lenke 1A型和1B型特发性脊柱侧凸青少年浅表背部肌肉的粘弹性特性","authors":"Burcu Şenol Gökalp , Ezgi Tarhan Altınok , Gözde Yağcı , Özgün Uysal , Fatih Erbahçeci","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In this study, we aimed to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of the superficial back muscles of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with Lenke Type 1A and 1B curves compared to their healthy peers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>20 participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and 20 healthy peers were evaluated. Cobb angle was recorded for scoliosis participants. The upper, middle, and lower trapezius muscles, and latissimus dorsi muscles were evaluated bilaterally with Myoton-3 as stiffness, elasticity and tone parameters for all participants.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Cobb angle was 20.30 ± 8.52° for participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Muscular stiffness in participants with scoliosis was greater than that of the healthy group for all muscles and both sides. Muscle elasticity was only different for the latissimus dorsi and middle trapezius muscles for the left side and they showed significantly decrease in participants with scoliosis. There was no statistical difference in muscle tone between the groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our findings suggest that adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis exhibit increased muscular stiffness bilaterally in superficial back muscles, decreased muscle elasticity on the concave side of the curve compared to healthy peers suggests potential implications for the biomechanics and rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 106421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viscoelastic properties of superficial back muscles in adolescents with Lenke Type 1A and 1B idiopathic scoliosis\",\"authors\":\"Burcu Şenol Gökalp , Ezgi Tarhan Altınok , Gözde Yağcı , Özgün Uysal , Fatih Erbahçeci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In this study, we aimed to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of the superficial back muscles of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with Lenke Type 1A and 1B curves compared to their healthy peers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>20 participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and 20 healthy peers were evaluated. Cobb angle was recorded for scoliosis participants. The upper, middle, and lower trapezius muscles, and latissimus dorsi muscles were evaluated bilaterally with Myoton-3 as stiffness, elasticity and tone parameters for all participants.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Cobb angle was 20.30 ± 8.52° for participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Muscular stiffness in participants with scoliosis was greater than that of the healthy group for all muscles and both sides. Muscle elasticity was only different for the latissimus dorsi and middle trapezius muscles for the left side and they showed significantly decrease in participants with scoliosis. There was no statistical difference in muscle tone between the groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our findings suggest that adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis exhibit increased muscular stiffness bilaterally in superficial back muscles, decreased muscle elasticity on the concave side of the curve compared to healthy peers suggests potential implications for the biomechanics and rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324002535\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324002535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：在这项研究中，我们旨在评估具有Lenke 1A型和1B型曲线的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者与健康同龄人相比背部浅表肌肉的粘弹性特性。方法：对20名青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者和20名健康同龄人进行评估。记录脊柱侧凸参与者的Cobb角。所有参与者的上、中、下斜方肌和背阔肌均通过myton -3进行双侧刚度、弹性和张力参数评估。结果：青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的Cobb角为20.30±8.52°。脊柱侧凸参与者的肌肉僵硬程度在所有肌肉和两侧都高于健康组。只有左侧背阔肌和中斜方肌的肌肉弹性不同，脊柱侧凸患者的肌肉弹性明显降低。两组间肌张力差异无统计学意义（p < 0.05）。解释：我们的研究结果表明，与健康同龄人相比，患有特发性脊柱侧凸的青少年在双侧浅表背部肌肉中表现出增加的肌肉僵硬，在曲线凹侧的肌肉弹性降低，这对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的生物力学和康复有潜在的影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Viscoelastic properties of superficial back muscles in adolescents with Lenke Type 1A and 1B idiopathic scoliosis

Background

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the viscoelastic properties of the superficial back muscles of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with Lenke Type 1A and 1B curves compared to their healthy peers.

Methods

20 participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and 20 healthy peers were evaluated. Cobb angle was recorded for scoliosis participants. The upper, middle, and lower trapezius muscles, and latissimus dorsi muscles were evaluated bilaterally with Myoton-3 as stiffness, elasticity and tone parameters for all participants.

Findings

Cobb angle was 20.30 ± 8.52° for participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Muscular stiffness in participants with scoliosis was greater than that of the healthy group for all muscles and both sides. Muscle elasticity was only different for the latissimus dorsi and middle trapezius muscles for the left side and they showed significantly decrease in participants with scoliosis. There was no statistical difference in muscle tone between the groups (p > 0.05).

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis exhibit increased muscular stiffness bilaterally in superficial back muscles, decreased muscle elasticity on the concave side of the curve compared to healthy peers suggests potential implications for the biomechanics and rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

5.60%

发文量

189

审稿时长

12.3 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.