低剂量口服牛奶后的3年预后。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Mai Tokunaga, Ken-Ichi Nagakura, Kyohei Takahashi, Sakura Sato, Motohiro Ebisawa, Noriyuki Yanagida
{"title":"低剂量口服牛奶后的3年预后。","authors":"Mai Tokunaga, Ken-Ichi Nagakura, Kyohei Takahashi, Sakura Sato, Motohiro Ebisawa, Noriyuki Yanagida","doi":"10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose (LD) oral food challenge (OFC) with heated cow's milk (CM; 3 mL) effectively prevents CM elimination in children with CM allergy (CMA). We investigated the long-term prognoses after an LD-OFC for CMA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with immediate CMA symptoms after consuming <25 mL of CM within 2 years of a baseline LD-OFC were retrospectively analyzed. Children who successfully passed the baseline LD-OFC (LD-passing) continued consuming 3 mL of CM at home, whereas those who failed (LD-failing) continued to avoid CM. Dose escalation occurred through stepwise OFCs or gradually at home. CM tolerance was defined as the ability to repeatedly consume ≥100 mL CM without experiencing symptoms; the inability to do so indicated persistent CMA. The prognoses of the LD-passing and LD-failing groups within 3 years of LD-OFC were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 113 children, the median age at baseline LD-OFC was 2.8 years; 41 % had an anaphylaxis history, with equal distribution between the LD-passing and LD-failing groups. Three years later, 63 % and 5 % of children demonstrated CM tolerance in the LD-passing and LD-failing groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the LD-passing group, predictors of persistent CMA were older age (adjusted hazard ratio [95 % confidence interval], 1.37 [1.00-1.88]), higher CM-specific IgE level (2.95 [1.30-6.68]) and other food allergies (2.34 [1.12-4.90]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure in LD-OFC is associated with persistent CMA, whereas successful LD-OFC outcomes are associated with a favorable prognosis thereafter, irrespective of a history of anaphylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48861,"journal":{"name":"Allergology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-year prognoses after low-dose oral food challenge for cow's milk.\",\"authors\":\"Mai Tokunaga, Ken-Ichi Nagakura, Kyohei Takahashi, Sakura Sato, Motohiro Ebisawa, Noriyuki Yanagida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-dose (LD) oral food challenge (OFC) with heated cow's milk (CM; 3 mL) effectively prevents CM elimination in children with CM allergy (CMA). We investigated the long-term prognoses after an LD-OFC for CMA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children with immediate CMA symptoms after consuming <25 mL of CM within 2 years of a baseline LD-OFC were retrospectively analyzed. Children who successfully passed the baseline LD-OFC (LD-passing) continued consuming 3 mL of CM at home, whereas those who failed (LD-failing) continued to avoid CM. Dose escalation occurred through stepwise OFCs or gradually at home. CM tolerance was defined as the ability to repeatedly consume ≥100 mL CM without experiencing symptoms; the inability to do so indicated persistent CMA. The prognoses of the LD-passing and LD-failing groups within 3 years of LD-OFC were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 113 children, the median age at baseline LD-OFC was 2.8 years; 41 % had an anaphylaxis history, with equal distribution between the LD-passing and LD-failing groups. Three years later, 63 % and 5 % of children demonstrated CM tolerance in the LD-passing and LD-failing groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the LD-passing group, predictors of persistent CMA were older age (adjusted hazard ratio [95 % confidence interval], 1.37 [1.00-1.88]), higher CM-specific IgE level (2.95 [1.30-6.68]) and other food allergies (2.34 [1.12-4.90]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure in LD-OFC is associated with persistent CMA, whereas successful LD-OFC outcomes are associated with a favorable prognosis thereafter, irrespective of a history of anaphylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alit.2024.09.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低剂量(LD)口服食物挑战(OFC)与加热牛奶(CM;3ml)有效防止CM过敏儿童CM消除。我们调查了CMA的LD-OFC术后的长期预后。结果:113名儿童中,基线LD-OFC的中位年龄为2.8岁;41%有过敏史,在ld通过组和ld失败组之间分布均匀。三年后,在ld通过组和ld失败组中,分别有63%和5%的儿童表现出CM耐受性(p)。结论:LD-OFC失败与持续性CMA相关,而LD-OFC成功的结果与此后良好的预后相关,与过敏史无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three-year prognoses after low-dose oral food challenge for cow's milk.

Background: Low-dose (LD) oral food challenge (OFC) with heated cow's milk (CM; 3 mL) effectively prevents CM elimination in children with CM allergy (CMA). We investigated the long-term prognoses after an LD-OFC for CMA.

Methods: Children with immediate CMA symptoms after consuming <25 mL of CM within 2 years of a baseline LD-OFC were retrospectively analyzed. Children who successfully passed the baseline LD-OFC (LD-passing) continued consuming 3 mL of CM at home, whereas those who failed (LD-failing) continued to avoid CM. Dose escalation occurred through stepwise OFCs or gradually at home. CM tolerance was defined as the ability to repeatedly consume ≥100 mL CM without experiencing symptoms; the inability to do so indicated persistent CMA. The prognoses of the LD-passing and LD-failing groups within 3 years of LD-OFC were compared.

Results: Among 113 children, the median age at baseline LD-OFC was 2.8 years; 41 % had an anaphylaxis history, with equal distribution between the LD-passing and LD-failing groups. Three years later, 63 % and 5 % of children demonstrated CM tolerance in the LD-passing and LD-failing groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the LD-passing group, predictors of persistent CMA were older age (adjusted hazard ratio [95 % confidence interval], 1.37 [1.00-1.88]), higher CM-specific IgE level (2.95 [1.30-6.68]) and other food allergies (2.34 [1.12-4.90]).

Conclusions: Failure in LD-OFC is associated with persistent CMA, whereas successful LD-OFC outcomes are associated with a favorable prognosis thereafter, irrespective of a history of anaphylaxis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Allergology International
Allergology International ALLERGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergology International is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology and publishes original papers dealing with the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of allergic and related diseases. Papers may include the study of methods of controlling allergic reactions, human and animal models of hypersensitivity and other aspects of basic and applied clinical allergy in its broadest sense. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and encourages authors from all countries to submit papers in the following three categories: Original Articles, Review Articles, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信