T Omari, A Ross, M Schar, J Campbell, D A Lewis, I Robinson, M Farahani, C Cock, B Mossel
{"title":"大剂量流变对咽部高分辨率测压阻抗得出的生理吞咽参数的影响。","authors":"T Omari, A Ross, M Schar, J Campbell, D A Lewis, I Robinson, M Farahani, C Cock, B Mossel","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shear rheology of ingested fluids influences their pharyngo-esophageal transit during deglutition. Thus, swallowed fluids elicit differing physiological responses due to their shear-thinning profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hydrocolloid fluids, xanthan gum (XG) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose gum (CMC), were compared in 10 healthy adults (mean age 39 years). Manometry swallowing assessments were performed using an 8-French catheter. Swallows were analyzed using the Swallow Gateway web application (www.swallowgateway.com). Grouped data were analyzed by a mixed statistical model. The coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) assessed the relationship between measures and bolus viscosity (SI units, mPa.s) at shear rates of 1-1000 s<sup>-1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Rheology confirmed that the thickened fluids had similar viscosities at 50 s<sup>-1</sup> shear rate (XG IDDSI Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively, 74.3, 161.2, and 399.6 mPa.s vs. CMC Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively 78.0, 176.5, and 429.2 mPa.s). However, at 300 s<sup>-1</sup> shear, CMC-thickened fluids exhibited approximately double the viscosity (XG Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively 19.5, 34.4, and 84.8 mPa.s vs. CMC Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively, 41.3, 80.8, and 160.2 mPa.s). In vivo swallows of CMC, when compared to XG, showed evidence of greater flow resistance, such as increased intrabolus pressure (p < 0.01) and UES Integrated Relaxation Pressure (UESIRP, p < 0.01) and shorter UES Relaxation Time (p < 0.05) and Bolus Presence Time (p < 0.001). The apparent fluid viscosity (mPa.s) correlated most significantly with increasing UESIRP (r<sup>2</sup> 0.69 at 50 s<sup>-1</sup> and r<sup>2</sup> 0.97 at 300 s<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluids with divergent shear viscosities demonstrated differences in pharyngeal function. These physiological responses were linked to the shear viscosity and not the IDDSI level.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e14988"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Bolus Rheology on Physiological Swallowing Parameters Derived by Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry Impedance.\",\"authors\":\"T Omari, A Ross, M Schar, J Campbell, D A Lewis, I Robinson, M Farahani, C Cock, B Mossel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nmo.14988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shear rheology of ingested fluids influences their pharyngo-esophageal transit during deglutition. Thus, swallowed fluids elicit differing physiological responses due to their shear-thinning profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hydrocolloid fluids, xanthan gum (XG) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose gum (CMC), were compared in 10 healthy adults (mean age 39 years). Manometry swallowing assessments were performed using an 8-French catheter. Swallows were analyzed using the Swallow Gateway web application (www.swallowgateway.com). Grouped data were analyzed by a mixed statistical model. The coefficient of determination (r<sup>2</sup>) assessed the relationship between measures and bolus viscosity (SI units, mPa.s) at shear rates of 1-1000 s<sup>-1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Rheology confirmed that the thickened fluids had similar viscosities at 50 s<sup>-1</sup> shear rate (XG IDDSI Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively, 74.3, 161.2, and 399.6 mPa.s vs. CMC Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively 78.0, 176.5, and 429.2 mPa.s). However, at 300 s<sup>-1</sup> shear, CMC-thickened fluids exhibited approximately double the viscosity (XG Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively 19.5, 34.4, and 84.8 mPa.s vs. CMC Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively, 41.3, 80.8, and 160.2 mPa.s). In vivo swallows of CMC, when compared to XG, showed evidence of greater flow resistance, such as increased intrabolus pressure (p < 0.01) and UES Integrated Relaxation Pressure (UESIRP, p < 0.01) and shorter UES Relaxation Time (p < 0.05) and Bolus Presence Time (p < 0.001). The apparent fluid viscosity (mPa.s) correlated most significantly with increasing UESIRP (r<sup>2</sup> 0.69 at 50 s<sup>-1</sup> and r<sup>2</sup> 0.97 at 300 s<sup>-1</sup>, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fluids with divergent shear viscosities demonstrated differences in pharyngeal function. These physiological responses were linked to the shear viscosity and not the IDDSI level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurogastroenterology and Motility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14988\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14988","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Bolus Rheology on Physiological Swallowing Parameters Derived by Pharyngeal High-Resolution Manometry Impedance.
Background: The shear rheology of ingested fluids influences their pharyngo-esophageal transit during deglutition. Thus, swallowed fluids elicit differing physiological responses due to their shear-thinning profile.
Methods: Two hydrocolloid fluids, xanthan gum (XG) and sodium carboxymethylcellulose gum (CMC), were compared in 10 healthy adults (mean age 39 years). Manometry swallowing assessments were performed using an 8-French catheter. Swallows were analyzed using the Swallow Gateway web application (www.swallowgateway.com). Grouped data were analyzed by a mixed statistical model. The coefficient of determination (r2) assessed the relationship between measures and bolus viscosity (SI units, mPa.s) at shear rates of 1-1000 s-1.
Key results: Rheology confirmed that the thickened fluids had similar viscosities at 50 s-1 shear rate (XG IDDSI Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively, 74.3, 161.2, and 399.6 mPa.s vs. CMC Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively 78.0, 176.5, and 429.2 mPa.s). However, at 300 s-1 shear, CMC-thickened fluids exhibited approximately double the viscosity (XG Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively 19.5, 34.4, and 84.8 mPa.s vs. CMC Level-1, 2, and 3 respectively, 41.3, 80.8, and 160.2 mPa.s). In vivo swallows of CMC, when compared to XG, showed evidence of greater flow resistance, such as increased intrabolus pressure (p < 0.01) and UES Integrated Relaxation Pressure (UESIRP, p < 0.01) and shorter UES Relaxation Time (p < 0.05) and Bolus Presence Time (p < 0.001). The apparent fluid viscosity (mPa.s) correlated most significantly with increasing UESIRP (r2 0.69 at 50 s-1 and r2 0.97 at 300 s-1, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Fluids with divergent shear viscosities demonstrated differences in pharyngeal function. These physiological responses were linked to the shear viscosity and not the IDDSI level.
期刊介绍:
Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.