澳大利亚的囊性纤维化带菌者筛查:比较不同血统的测序和靶向样本。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Eric Lee, Kaylee Orton
{"title":"澳大利亚的囊性纤维化带菌者筛查:比较不同血统的测序和靶向样本。","authors":"Eric Lee, Kaylee Orton","doi":"10.1136/jmg-2024-110365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening panels may lack sensitivity in non-European ancestry groups. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity of various panels in Australian CF carriers identified through sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following panels were evaluated in 869 CF carriers: Asuragen, Elucigene, Devyser, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Victorian Clinical Genetics Services. Ancestry-specific CF carrier frequencies from population databases and Bayesian analysis were used to estimate post-test residual carrier risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When variants with varying clinical consequences (VCC) were not considered, mean test sensitivity was highest in the Northern Europe group (95.6%) and lowest in the Southern Asia group (64.0%). The post-test residual carrier risk in the Northern Europe group was approximately 1 in 546, with only the Southern Asia group having a higher residual carrier risk of 1 in 179.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Southern Asia group exhibited the lowest test sensitivity and the highest post-test residual carrier risk, surpassing that of the Northern Europe group. The inclusion or exclusion of VCC significantly impacted the calculated test sensitivities. Further research is suggested to better characterise <i>CFTR</i> variants in non-European ancestry groups and to determine which VCC, if any, should be included in carrier screening reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":16237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in Australia: comparing sequencing and targeted panels across diverse ancestries.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Lee, Kaylee Orton\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jmg-2024-110365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening panels may lack sensitivity in non-European ancestry groups. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity of various panels in Australian CF carriers identified through sequencing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following panels were evaluated in 869 CF carriers: Asuragen, Elucigene, Devyser, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Victorian Clinical Genetics Services. Ancestry-specific CF carrier frequencies from population databases and Bayesian analysis were used to estimate post-test residual carrier risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When variants with varying clinical consequences (VCC) were not considered, mean test sensitivity was highest in the Northern Europe group (95.6%) and lowest in the Southern Asia group (64.0%). The post-test residual carrier risk in the Northern Europe group was approximately 1 in 546, with only the Southern Asia group having a higher residual carrier risk of 1 in 179.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Southern Asia group exhibited the lowest test sensitivity and the highest post-test residual carrier risk, surpassing that of the Northern Europe group. The inclusion or exclusion of VCC significantly impacted the calculated test sensitivities. Further research is suggested to better characterise <i>CFTR</i> variants in non-European ancestry groups and to determine which VCC, if any, should be included in carrier screening reports.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-110365\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-110365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:靶向囊性纤维化(CF)携带者筛查面板在非欧洲血统人群中可能缺乏敏感性。本研究旨在评估通过测序确定的澳大利亚CF携带者的各种面板的敏感性。方法:对869例CF携带者进行评估:Asuragen、Elucigene、Devyser、美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院和维多利亚临床遗传学服务。来自人群数据库的特定CF携带者频率和贝叶斯分析用于估计检测后剩余携带者风险。结果:当不考虑具有不同临床后果的变异(VCC)时,北欧组的平均检测灵敏度最高(95.6%),南亚组最低(64.0%)。北欧组的测试后残留携带者风险约为1 / 546,只有南亚组的残留携带者风险更高,为1 / 179。结论:南亚组的检测灵敏度最低,检测后残留携带者风险最高,超过北欧组。纳入或排除VCC显著影响计算的测试灵敏度。建议进一步研究以更好地表征非欧洲血统人群的CFTR变异,并确定哪些VCC(如果有的话)应包括在携带者筛查报告中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cystic fibrosis carrier screening in Australia: comparing sequencing and targeted panels across diverse ancestries.

Background: Targeted cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening panels may lack sensitivity in non-European ancestry groups. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity of various panels in Australian CF carriers identified through sequencing.

Methods: The following panels were evaluated in 869 CF carriers: Asuragen, Elucigene, Devyser, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and Victorian Clinical Genetics Services. Ancestry-specific CF carrier frequencies from population databases and Bayesian analysis were used to estimate post-test residual carrier risks.

Results: When variants with varying clinical consequences (VCC) were not considered, mean test sensitivity was highest in the Northern Europe group (95.6%) and lowest in the Southern Asia group (64.0%). The post-test residual carrier risk in the Northern Europe group was approximately 1 in 546, with only the Southern Asia group having a higher residual carrier risk of 1 in 179.

Conclusion: The Southern Asia group exhibited the lowest test sensitivity and the highest post-test residual carrier risk, surpassing that of the Northern Europe group. The inclusion or exclusion of VCC significantly impacted the calculated test sensitivities. Further research is suggested to better characterise CFTR variants in non-European ancestry groups and to determine which VCC, if any, should be included in carrier screening reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Genetics
Journal of Medical Genetics 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Genetics is a leading international peer-reviewed journal covering original research in human genetics, including reviews of and opinion on the latest developments. Articles cover the molecular basis of human disease including germline cancer genetics, clinical manifestations of genetic disorders, applications of molecular genetics to medical practice and the systematic evaluation of such applications worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信