Maxime Fieux, Bruna R Castro, Sophie S Jang, Carol H Yan, Zara M Patel
{"title":"PRP注射治疗病毒后嗅觉丧失的长期疗效:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Maxime Fieux, Bruna R Castro, Sophie S Jang, Carol H Yan, Zara M Patel","doi":"10.1002/alr.23505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have previously been shown to benefit coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced smell loss. It is unknown if that benefit is stable over time. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes at 1-year post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study. Sixteen patients (10 PRP and six placebo) from the original PRP randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, and a further 16 patients from smell clinic who were a year out from initial treatment (six PRP patients and 10 non-PRP) were enrolled. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Tests (UPSITs) and visual analog scale (VAS) subjective scores were compared to initial scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between groups with respect to age, gender, race, duration of smell loss prior to intervention, smoking or diabetes status, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of phantosmia or parosmia, or baseline UPSIT score. The PRP group had a significantly higher change in UPSIT score at 1 year (p = 0.001), a higher number of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference for the UPSIT (87.5% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.004), and a significantly greater change in VAS at 1 year (p = 0.001), compared to those who did not receive injections. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, no factors appeared to have a significant effect on these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections into the olfactory cleft now have long-term data suggesting benefit in both subjective and psychophysical measures of smell, and improvements in both realms at 1 year are significantly higher than in those who do not receive the injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13716,"journal":{"name":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Outcomes of PRP Injections for Post-viral Olfactory Loss: A Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maxime Fieux, Bruna R Castro, Sophie S Jang, Carol H Yan, Zara M Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/alr.23505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have previously been shown to benefit coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced smell loss. It is unknown if that benefit is stable over time. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes at 1-year post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cohort study. Sixteen patients (10 PRP and six placebo) from the original PRP randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, and a further 16 patients from smell clinic who were a year out from initial treatment (six PRP patients and 10 non-PRP) were enrolled. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Tests (UPSITs) and visual analog scale (VAS) subjective scores were compared to initial scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between groups with respect to age, gender, race, duration of smell loss prior to intervention, smoking or diabetes status, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of phantosmia or parosmia, or baseline UPSIT score. The PRP group had a significantly higher change in UPSIT score at 1 year (p = 0.001), a higher number of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference for the UPSIT (87.5% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.004), and a significantly greater change in VAS at 1 year (p = 0.001), compared to those who did not receive injections. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, no factors appeared to have a significant effect on these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections into the olfactory cleft now have long-term data suggesting benefit in both subjective and psychophysical measures of smell, and improvements in both realms at 1 year are significantly higher than in those who do not receive the injections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:富血小板血浆(PRP)注射先前已被证明有益于2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)引起的嗅觉丧失。目前尚不清楚这种益处是否会随着时间的推移而稳定。本研究的目的是评估干预后1年的结果。方法:前瞻性队列研究。16名患者(10名PRP患者和6名安慰剂患者)来自最初的PRP随机对照临床试验,另外16名患者来自嗅觉诊所,他们从最初的治疗结束一年(6名PRP患者和10名非PRP患者)。将宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(upsit)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)的主观得分与初始得分进行比较。结果:在年龄、性别、种族、干预前嗅觉丧失持续时间、吸烟或糖尿病状况、Charlson合并症指数、幻影或嗅觉缺失的存在或基线UPSIT评分方面,组间无差异。与未接受注射的患者相比,PRP组在1年时UPSIT评分的变化明显更高(p = 0.001),满足UPSIT最小临床重要差异的患者数量更高(87.5% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.004), 1年时VAS的变化明显更大(p = 0.001)。在多变量logistic回归分析中,没有因素对这些发现有显著影响。结论:PRP注射到嗅觉裂中,现在有长期数据表明,在嗅觉的主观和心理物理测量方面都有好处,并且在1年后这两个领域的改善都明显高于未接受注射的人。
Long-term Outcomes of PRP Injections for Post-viral Olfactory Loss: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have previously been shown to benefit coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced smell loss. It is unknown if that benefit is stable over time. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes at 1-year post-intervention.
Methods: Prospective cohort study. Sixteen patients (10 PRP and six placebo) from the original PRP randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial, and a further 16 patients from smell clinic who were a year out from initial treatment (six PRP patients and 10 non-PRP) were enrolled. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Tests (UPSITs) and visual analog scale (VAS) subjective scores were compared to initial scores.
Results: There was no difference between groups with respect to age, gender, race, duration of smell loss prior to intervention, smoking or diabetes status, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of phantosmia or parosmia, or baseline UPSIT score. The PRP group had a significantly higher change in UPSIT score at 1 year (p = 0.001), a higher number of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference for the UPSIT (87.5% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.004), and a significantly greater change in VAS at 1 year (p = 0.001), compared to those who did not receive injections. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, no factors appeared to have a significant effect on these findings.
Conclusion: PRP injections into the olfactory cleft now have long-term data suggesting benefit in both subjective and psychophysical measures of smell, and improvements in both realms at 1 year are significantly higher than in those who do not receive the injections.
期刊介绍:
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinologyis a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and the Official Journal of the American Rhinologic Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy.
International Forum of Allergy Rhinology provides a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and others to publish original research and explore controversies in the medical and surgical treatment of patients with otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base conditions. The application of current research to the management of otolaryngic allergy, rhinologic, and skull base diseases and the need for further investigation will be highlighted.