静脉-静脉ECMO下伊伐布雷定或β受体阻滞剂治疗难治性低氧血症的心输出量控制

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Paul Masi, Lionel Tchatat Wangueu, François Bagate, Alexandra Plesa, Thierry Folliguet, Armand Mekontso Dessap
{"title":"静脉-静脉ECMO下伊伐布雷定或β受体阻滞剂治疗难治性低氧血症的心输出量控制","authors":"Paul Masi, Lionel Tchatat Wangueu, François Bagate, Alexandra Plesa, Thierry Folliguet, Armand Mekontso Dessap","doi":"10.1007/s10557-024-07650-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hypoxemia is a risk factor for mortality and long-term neuropsychological impairment during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a potential treatment for such cases but may not suffice. We aimed to evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions for cardiac output (CO) control using ivabradine or beta-blockers for refractory hypoxemia during VV-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe ARDS who underwent VV-ECMO at a tertiary university hospital between March 2020 and May 2022. Patients with refractory hypoxemia under VV-ECMO were included. Pharmacological interventions included ivabradine and/or short half-life beta-blockers. The primary endpoint was the change in ECMO flow/CO ratio and secondary endpoints were changes in macrocirculation (mean arterial pressure), oxygenation [arterial saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>) and oxygen transport (DO<sub>2</sub>)] and tissue hypoxia (lactate levels).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 70 patients on VV-ECMO, ten had refractory hypoxemia under VV-ECMO and received pharmacological interventions to control CO. The ECMO flow/CO ratio significantly increased with pharmacological intervention overall (from 60% [50-66] to 69% [61-81], p = 0.02), as well as with beta-blockers or ivabradine individually. However, DO<sub>2</sub> decreased, especially with beta-blockers and to some extent with ivabradine. There were no reported immediate adverse events, and lactate levels remained below the anaerobic threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ivabradine and beta-blockers were clinically well-tolerated and improved the ECMO flow/CO ratio in patients with refractory hypoxemia during VV-ECMO. However, the improvement of arterial oxygenation was associated with decreased DO<sub>2</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Control of Cardiac Output with Ivabradine or Beta-Blockers for Refractory Hypoxemia under Veno-Venous ECMO for Severe ARDS.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Masi, Lionel Tchatat Wangueu, François Bagate, Alexandra Plesa, Thierry Folliguet, Armand Mekontso Dessap\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10557-024-07650-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hypoxemia is a risk factor for mortality and long-term neuropsychological impairment during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a potential treatment for such cases but may not suffice. We aimed to evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions for cardiac output (CO) control using ivabradine or beta-blockers for refractory hypoxemia during VV-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe ARDS who underwent VV-ECMO at a tertiary university hospital between March 2020 and May 2022. Patients with refractory hypoxemia under VV-ECMO were included. Pharmacological interventions included ivabradine and/or short half-life beta-blockers. The primary endpoint was the change in ECMO flow/CO ratio and secondary endpoints were changes in macrocirculation (mean arterial pressure), oxygenation [arterial saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>) and oxygen transport (DO<sub>2</sub>)] and tissue hypoxia (lactate levels).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 70 patients on VV-ECMO, ten had refractory hypoxemia under VV-ECMO and received pharmacological interventions to control CO. The ECMO flow/CO ratio significantly increased with pharmacological intervention overall (from 60% [50-66] to 69% [61-81], p = 0.02), as well as with beta-blockers or ivabradine individually. However, DO<sub>2</sub> decreased, especially with beta-blockers and to some extent with ivabradine. There were no reported immediate adverse events, and lactate levels remained below the anaerobic threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ivabradine and beta-blockers were clinically well-tolerated and improved the ECMO flow/CO ratio in patients with refractory hypoxemia during VV-ECMO. However, the improvement of arterial oxygenation was associated with decreased DO<sub>2</sub>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07650-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07650-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:低氧血症是严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者死亡和长期神经心理损害的危险因素。静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)是一种潜在的治疗方法,但可能还不够。我们的目的是评估在VV-ECMO期间,使用伊伐布雷定或β受体阻滞剂对难治性低氧血症进行心输出量(CO)控制的药理干预的效果。方法:回顾性分析2020年3月至2022年5月在某三级大学医院连续行VV-ECMO的严重ARDS患者。纳入了VV-ECMO下难治性低氧血症患者。药物干预包括伊伐布雷定和/或短半衰期β受体阻滞剂。主要终点是ECMO流量/CO比值的变化,次要终点是大循环(平均动脉压)、氧合[动脉饱和度(SaO2)和氧转运(DO2)]和组织缺氧(乳酸水平)的变化。结果:在70例VV-ECMO患者中,10例患者在VV-ECMO下出现难治性低氧血症,并接受药物干预以控制CO。药物干预总体上(从60%[50-66]增加到69% [61-81],p = 0.02)以及单独使用β受体阻滞剂或伊伐布雷定,ECMO流量/CO比显著增加。然而,DO2下降,特别是β受体阻滞剂和伊伐布雷定在一定程度上。没有立即报告的不良事件,乳酸水平保持在无氧阈值以下。结论:伊伐布雷定和β受体阻滞剂临床耐受性良好,可改善VV-ECMO期间难治性低氧血症患者的ECMO流量/CO比。然而,动脉氧合的改善与DO2的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Control of Cardiac Output with Ivabradine or Beta-Blockers for Refractory Hypoxemia under Veno-Venous ECMO for Severe ARDS.

Purpose: Hypoxemia is a risk factor for mortality and long-term neuropsychological impairment during severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a potential treatment for such cases but may not suffice. We aimed to evaluate the effects of pharmacological interventions for cardiac output (CO) control using ivabradine or beta-blockers for refractory hypoxemia during VV-ECMO.

Methods: The study involved retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe ARDS who underwent VV-ECMO at a tertiary university hospital between March 2020 and May 2022. Patients with refractory hypoxemia under VV-ECMO were included. Pharmacological interventions included ivabradine and/or short half-life beta-blockers. The primary endpoint was the change in ECMO flow/CO ratio and secondary endpoints were changes in macrocirculation (mean arterial pressure), oxygenation [arterial saturation (SaO2) and oxygen transport (DO2)] and tissue hypoxia (lactate levels).

Results: Out of 70 patients on VV-ECMO, ten had refractory hypoxemia under VV-ECMO and received pharmacological interventions to control CO. The ECMO flow/CO ratio significantly increased with pharmacological intervention overall (from 60% [50-66] to 69% [61-81], p = 0.02), as well as with beta-blockers or ivabradine individually. However, DO2 decreased, especially with beta-blockers and to some extent with ivabradine. There were no reported immediate adverse events, and lactate levels remained below the anaerobic threshold.

Conclusion: Ivabradine and beta-blockers were clinically well-tolerated and improved the ECMO flow/CO ratio in patients with refractory hypoxemia during VV-ECMO. However, the improvement of arterial oxygenation was associated with decreased DO2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field. Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients. Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信