{"title":"骨关节炎患者骨密度与关节置换术风险的因果关系:一项孟德尔随机研究","authors":"Rui Zhu, Xing Xing, Jingyuan Bian, Xiaoyue Zhang, Liru Ge, Guoqi Cai","doi":"10.1007/s10067-024-07289-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Population-based studies have been inconsistent in terms of the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and the progression of osteoarthritis. This study aimed to evaluate the causal relationship between BMD and the risk of joint replacement in patients with osteoarthritis. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine the association of BMD of the total body, femoral neck, and lumbar spine with the risk of hip and knee replacements. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the main analysis method. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were checked. Multivariable MR analysis was performed by adjusting for hip/knee pain, body mass index (BMI), estrogen levels, BMI-based sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels, and physical activity. BMD of the total body and the lumbar spine were significantly associated with higher risks of both knee (IVW odds ratios (ORs) = 1.08-1.10, p = 4.62E-03) and hip replacements (IVW ORs = 1.19-1.37, P = 3.23E-09). Femoral neck BMD was significantly associated with the risk of hip but not knee replacement (IVW OR = 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.43, p = 9.15E-05). Multivariable MR analyses produced similar results compared to the univariable analyses. No evidence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were found, except that there was heterogeneity in the association between total body BMD and the risk of knee replacement. BMD is significantly associated with an increased risk of both knee and hip replacement, and the association is stronger for hip replacement. These findings suggest a causal relationship between BMD and the progression of osteoarthritis. Key Points • BMD is associated with an increased risk of hip and knee joint replacement. • BMD was more strongly associated with hip replacement risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":10482,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal association between bone mineral density and the risk of joint replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Zhu, Xing Xing, Jingyuan Bian, Xiaoyue Zhang, Liru Ge, Guoqi Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10067-024-07289-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Population-based studies have been inconsistent in terms of the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and the progression of osteoarthritis. This study aimed to evaluate the causal relationship between BMD and the risk of joint replacement in patients with osteoarthritis. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine the association of BMD of the total body, femoral neck, and lumbar spine with the risk of hip and knee replacements. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the main analysis method. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were checked. Multivariable MR analysis was performed by adjusting for hip/knee pain, body mass index (BMI), estrogen levels, BMI-based sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels, and physical activity. BMD of the total body and the lumbar spine were significantly associated with higher risks of both knee (IVW odds ratios (ORs) = 1.08-1.10, p = 4.62E-03) and hip replacements (IVW ORs = 1.19-1.37, P = 3.23E-09). Femoral neck BMD was significantly associated with the risk of hip but not knee replacement (IVW OR = 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.43, p = 9.15E-05). Multivariable MR analyses produced similar results compared to the univariable analyses. No evidence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were found, except that there was heterogeneity in the association between total body BMD and the risk of knee replacement. BMD is significantly associated with an increased risk of both knee and hip replacement, and the association is stronger for hip replacement. These findings suggest a causal relationship between BMD and the progression of osteoarthritis. Key Points • BMD is associated with an increased risk of hip and knee joint replacement. • BMD was more strongly associated with hip replacement risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07289-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07289-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于人群的研究在骨密度(BMD)与骨关节炎进展之间的关系方面一直不一致。本研究旨在评估骨密度与骨关节炎患者关节置换术风险之间的因果关系。我们进行了一项双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以确定全身、股骨颈和腰椎的骨密度与髋关节和膝关节置换术风险的关系。采用方差逆加权(IVW)作为主要分析方法。检验异质性和水平多效性。通过调整髋关节/膝关节疼痛、体重指数(BMI)、雌激素水平、基于BMI的性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)水平和身体活动,进行多变量MR分析。全身骨密度和腰椎骨密度与双膝关节(IVW比值比(or) = 1.08-1.10, p = 4.62 -03)和髋关节置换术(IVW比值比(or) = 1.19-1.37, p = 3.23E-09)的风险升高显著相关。股骨颈骨密度与髋关节置换术的风险显著相关,但与膝关节置换术无关(IVW OR = 1.27, 95%可信区间1.13 ~ 1.43,p = 9.15E-05)。与单变量分析相比,多变量MR分析产生了相似的结果。除了总体骨密度与膝关节置换术风险之间存在异质性外,未发现异质性和水平多效性的证据。骨密度与膝关节和髋关节置换术风险增加显著相关,且与髋关节置换术的相关性更强。这些发现表明骨密度与骨关节炎的进展之间存在因果关系。•骨密度与髋关节和膝关节置换术风险增加有关。•骨密度与髋关节置换术风险的相关性更强。
Causal association between bone mineral density and the risk of joint replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a Mendelian randomization study.
Population-based studies have been inconsistent in terms of the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and the progression of osteoarthritis. This study aimed to evaluate the causal relationship between BMD and the risk of joint replacement in patients with osteoarthritis. We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine the association of BMD of the total body, femoral neck, and lumbar spine with the risk of hip and knee replacements. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the main analysis method. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were checked. Multivariable MR analysis was performed by adjusting for hip/knee pain, body mass index (BMI), estrogen levels, BMI-based sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels, and physical activity. BMD of the total body and the lumbar spine were significantly associated with higher risks of both knee (IVW odds ratios (ORs) = 1.08-1.10, p = 4.62E-03) and hip replacements (IVW ORs = 1.19-1.37, P = 3.23E-09). Femoral neck BMD was significantly associated with the risk of hip but not knee replacement (IVW OR = 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.43, p = 9.15E-05). Multivariable MR analyses produced similar results compared to the univariable analyses. No evidence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were found, except that there was heterogeneity in the association between total body BMD and the risk of knee replacement. BMD is significantly associated with an increased risk of both knee and hip replacement, and the association is stronger for hip replacement. These findings suggest a causal relationship between BMD and the progression of osteoarthritis. Key Points • BMD is associated with an increased risk of hip and knee joint replacement. • BMD was more strongly associated with hip replacement risk.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rheumatology is an international English-language journal devoted to publishing original clinical investigation and research in the general field of rheumatology with accent on clinical aspects at postgraduate level.
The journal succeeds Acta Rheumatologica Belgica, originally founded in 1945 as the official journal of the Belgian Rheumatology Society. Clinical Rheumatology aims to cover all modern trends in clinical and experimental research as well as the management and evaluation of diagnostic and treatment procedures connected with the inflammatory, immunologic, metabolic, genetic and degenerative soft and hard connective tissue diseases.